Catholic Info

Traditional Catholic Faith => SSPX Resistance News => Topic started by: Matthew on February 04, 2018, 09:50:21 PM

Title: Eleison Comments - Official Church? (No. 551)
Post by: Matthew on February 04, 2018, 09:50:21 PM
Number DLI (551)
February 3, 2018
“Official Church”?
Rome may manoeuvre, dodge, deceive, outwit,
But with lines curved straight things by God are writ.

One needs to be very careful with words, because words are the handle of our mind upon things, and things are the stuff of everyday life. Therefore upon words depends how we will lead our lives. At the flagship parish church of the Society of St Pius X in Paris, France, there is a Society priest taking due care of words. Fr Gabriel Billecocq wrote in last month’s issue (#333) of the parish’s monthly magazine Le Chardonnet an article entitled “Did you say ‘official Church’?.” In it he never once mentions Society Headquarters in Menzingen, Switzerland, but he does complain of the “wish” coming from somewhere, presumably on high, that the words “Conciliar Church” should always be replaced by the words “official Church.” And he is right, because the words “Conciliar Church” are perfectly clear, whereas the words “official Church” are not clear, but ambiguous.
For on the one hand “Conciliar Church” signifies clearly that large part of today’s Church which is more or less poisoned with the errors of the Second Vatican Council. Those errors consist essentially in the re-centring upon man of the Church which should be centred on God. On the other hand “official Church” is an expression with two possible meanings. Either it can mean the Church officially instituted by Christ and officially brought to us down the ages by the succession of Popes, and to that “official Church” no Catholic can object, on the contrary. Or “official Church” can be taken to mean that mass of the Church’s officials devoted to Vatican II who for the last half-century have been using their official power in Rome to inflict upon Catholics the Conciliar errors, and to this “official Church” no Catholic can not object. Therefore “Conciliar Church” expresses something automatically bad, while “official Church” expresses something good or bad, depending upon which of its two meanings it is being given. Therefore to replace “Conciliar Church” by “official church” is to replace clarity by confusion, and it also stops Catholics from referring to the evil of Vatican II.
Fr Billecocq never suggests that Society Headquarters did “wish” such a thing, but a fact and a speculation do suggest it. As for the fact, earlier this month the Society’s French District Superior, Fr Christian Bouchacourt, being interviewed in public about the Society’s up-coming elections in July, said: “As soon as a Superior General is elected, the Vatican is immediately notified of the decision.” Such notifying of the Vatican by the Society as to Society elections has never been done before. And it strongly suggests that the Society’s present leaders look forward to Rome not only being informed but also giving its official approval of the Society’s choice of its leaders – why notify if not to get approval? What else will the Newsociety beg for from the Newchurch? What will it not beg for? How far the Society has come from the days when the faith of Archbishop Lefebvre used to force Rome to do the begging!
As for the speculation, we hear that two main candidates are being groomed by Menzingen for voters at the Society’s July elections to choose as Superior General, because the post will no longer be taken by a bishop. At a guess, Rome is already in virtual control of these major decisions being taken within Society Headquarters. In that case Rome has little to fear of either of these two candidates substantially changing Bishop Fellay’s pro-Roman policies, while it may have much to gain from the appearance of a change at the top, and it may be able to make use of Bishop Fellay in Rome to be head of a “renovated” Ecclesia Dei Congregation, to include all Traditional communities, including his own former Society.
Who can doubt the skill of the Romans to turn all situations to their advantage? Unless. . . unless there were to break out again within the Society that Faith and Truth which were the driving force of Archbishop Lefebvre and of his victory over all the liberals and modernists in Rome. These demons strive to undo once and for all God’s Catholic Tradition which is the most serious potential obstacle to their new One World Religion. And God may require no less than the blood of Catholic martyrs to stop them. The martyrs coming from among the Society’s priests and lay-folk will be its glory.
Kyrie eleison.
Title: Re: Eleison Comments - Official Church? (No. 551)
Post by: Incredulous on February 05, 2018, 11:30:44 AM
Oh wow... these "Maccabean" style ECs are my favorite!   :jumping2:

Full of political intrigue, Church militancy, blood & guts!


"Who can doubt the skill of the Romans to turn all situations to their advantage?"

"These demons strive to undo once and for all God’s Catholic Tradition which is the most serious potential obstacle to their new One World Religion."

"And God may require no less than the blood of Catholic martyrs to stop them. The martyrs coming from among the Society’s priests and lay-folk will be its glory."

Title: Re: Eleison Comments - Official Church? (No. 551)
Post by: PG on February 05, 2018, 11:36:21 AM
This was a really good EC.  
Title: Re: Eleison Comments - Official Church? (No. 551)
Post by: Incredulous on February 05, 2018, 11:53:45 AM

It's good to get the names of the opposing forces straight, to minimize the battlefield smoke & confusion: 

Conciliar Church,  Official Church,  newChurch

Versus

Traditional Roman Catholic Church,  Latin rite remnant Church or Church eclipsed.


The latter name given by Our Lady of LaSalette  

(http://devotiontoourlady.com/uploads/3/5/2/7/35275079/published/our-lady-of-la-salette-01.jpg?1505844039)
Title: Re: Eleison Comments - Official Church? (No. 551)
Post by: SeanJohnson on February 05, 2018, 12:05:19 PM
Some commentary:

http://sodalitium-pianum.com/eleison-comments-551-official-church-brief-commentary-follows/
Title: Re: Eleison Comments - Official Church? (No. 551)
Post by: JPaul on February 05, 2018, 12:46:43 PM
The conciliar church is not the Catholic Church. Only those who fail to make this distinction and think that it is something else can be confused by terms. Clear thinking and discernment tell us it is not.

Quote
"Now we have received not the spirit of this world, but the Spirit that is of God; that we may know the things that are given us from God."
The conciliar entity is not from God but is from His adversary.

The SSPX is a slow motion train wreck, and save a divine intervention has become a a failed experiment.
It s time to move beyond and away from it and find other ways to save our souls and remain faithful.
Title: Re: Eleison Comments - Official Church? (No. 551)
Post by: Incredulous on February 05, 2018, 12:49:30 PM

According to SSPX Father Dominique Bourmaud, 

there's also the "dangerous, schismatic, ghetto mentality" Resistance Church.

(http://sspx.org/sites/sspx/files/styles/news_big/public/news/main.jpg)

But there so low class...
they can't even offer a French priest some smelly cheese or a good bottle of wine!
Title: Re: Eleison Comments - Official Church? (No. 551)
Post by: PG on February 05, 2018, 12:57:09 PM
According to SSPX Father Dominique Bourmaud,

there's also the "dangerous, schismatic, ghetto mentality" Resistance Church.

(http://sspx.org/sites/sspx/files/styles/news_big/public/news/main.jpg)

But there so low class...
they can't even offer a French priest some smelly cheese or a good bottle of wine!
Stinky cheese and a "good" bottle of wine.  Those are two things I hate.
Title: Re: Eleison Comments - Official Church? (No. 551)
Post by: Neil Obstat on February 05, 2018, 01:17:29 PM
.
At the flagship parish church of the Society of St Pius X in Paris, France,...
.
That would be St. Nicolas du Chardonnet!
(https://s14-eu5.ixquick.com/wikioimage/cd0b8cae425b4e684f95b2fa06f13d27.jpg)
.
Fr Gabriel Billecocq wrote in last month’s issue (#333) of the parish’s monthly magazine Le Chardonnet an article entitled “Did you say ‘official Church’?” In it he never once mentions Society Headquarters in Menzingen, Switzerland, but he does complain of the “wish” coming from somewhere, presumably on high, that the words “Conciliar Church” should always be replaced by the words “official Church.” And he is right, because the words “Conciliar Church” are perfectly clear, whereas the words “official Church” are not clear, but ambiguous.
.
It's nice to get a "heads-up" like this. Watch out for "official Church" being kicked around in the near future. RE: EC DLI.
.
Looks like Newrome is demanding that the term "official Church" become implemented from "on high" in the XSPX.
E.g., part of the secret negotiations that have been going on behind closed doors, and fairly denied by some.
I.e., the "deal" or the "practical agreement" has already been achieved, a fait accompli, as they say in Paris.
.
As for the speculation, we hear that two main candidates are being groomed by Menzingen for voters at the Society’s July elections to choose as Superior General, because the post will no longer be taken by a bishop. At a guess, Rome is already in virtual control of these major decisions being taken within Society Headquarters. In that case Rome has little to fear of either of these two candidates substantially changing Bishop Fellay’s pro-Roman policies, while it may have much to gain from the appearance of a change at the top, and it may be able to make use of Bishop Fellay in Rome to be head of a “renovated” Ecclesia Dei Congregation, to include all Traditional communities, including his own former Society.
.
And here +W expects +Fellay to step down in June, to be transferred over to a head a new body that will swallow up the Society -- Newrome must be pleased with the performance of +F and is offering him a "luscious plum" (his own words, from 1995), not to be confused with the fruit from the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil.
.
Returning to the ambiguous "official Church" theme...
.
For on the one hand “Conciliar Church” signifies clearly that large part of today’s Church which is more or less poisoned with the errors of the Second Vatican Council. Those errors consist essentially in the re-centring upon man of the Church which should be centred on God. 
.
This term, "Conciliar Church" was one coined by one of the Newchurch Modernists, and immediately recognized by Fr. Malachi Martin as the PROPER TERM to use when referring to the Modernists who have overtaken the Roman seat of the Church. It has been for the past 30 years a very specific and clear term which leaves nothing to the imagination. But Newchurch Modernists abhor clarity and definition. They much prefer wiggle room and therefore AMBIGUITY. One might say, duplicity is their norm.
.
On the other hand “official Church” is an expression with two possible meanings

Either it can mean  1) the Church officially instituted by Christ and officially brought to us down the ages by the succession of Popes, and to that “official Church” no Catholic can object, on the contrary. 

Or  2) “official Church” can be taken to mean that mass [crowd] of the Church’s officials devoted to Vatican II who for the last half-century have been using their official power in Rome to inflict upon Catholics the Conciliar errors, and to this “official Church” no Catholic can not object. 
.
...the Church’s officials devoted to Vatican II who for the last half-century have been using their official power in Rome to inflict upon Catholics the Conciliar errors... Some words can stand alone -- this should be a very useful direct quote.
.
Therefore “Conciliar Church” expresses something automatically bad, while “official Church” expresses something good or bad, depending upon which of its two meanings it is being given. Therefore to replace “Conciliar Church” by “official church” is to replace clarity by confusion, and it also stops Catholics from referring to the evil of Vatican II.
.
So it has a DOUBLE PURPOSE - it replaces clarity with confusion, and it stops Catholics from referring to the evil of Vat.II -- notice what +W has not pronounced here, that this DOUBLE PURPOSE has been nothing other than the +Fellayite agenda ever since 1994 when he was first elected, but something that he has implemented in stages of development over the past 24 long years; the stages of which have been chronicled here on CI but to which stages the blind followers of the XSPX are oblivious. How many blind followers of the XSPX do you know who have never heard of GREC? Or the AFD (a.k.a. Doctrinal Declaration of April 15th, 2012)? Oh, right, they've heard of +W's expulsion but he deserved it, don't ya' know - he was a disobedient αnтι-ѕємιтє. 
.
Notice, if you will, that this DOUBLE PURPOSE shares a lot ideologically with the hermeneutic of continuity of Benedict XVI.
.
There are a lot of things an E.C. contains that a reader unfamiliar with recent history would not understand.
.
Title: Re: Eleison Comments - Official Church? (No. 551)
Post by: Neil Obstat on February 05, 2018, 01:25:03 PM
According to SSPX Father Dominique Bourmaud,

there's also the "dangerous, schismatic, ghetto mentality" Resistance Church.

(http://sspx.org/sites/sspx/files/styles/news_big/public/news/main.jpg)

But they're so low class...
they can't even offer a French priest some smelly cheese or a good bottle of wine!
.
And the smelly cheese / fine wine combo would be more enjoyable with real cut lead crystal instead of that form-pressed glass, above, the one with the SEAM running down the sides! It's amazing what you can see in a photo. It's worth 1,000 words!
.
After the wine and cheese could come a nice cigar and rare cognac.
.
Title: Re: Eleison Comments - Official Church? (No. 551)
Post by: Franciscan Solitary on February 05, 2018, 01:27:04 PM
It's good to get the names of the opposing forces straight, to minimize the battlefield smoke & confusion:

Conciliar Church,  Official Church,  newChurch

Versus

Traditional Roman Catholic Church,  Latin rite remnant Church or Church eclipsed.


The latter name given by Our Lady of LaSalette  

(http://devotiontoourlady.com/uploads/3/5/2/7/35275079/published/our-lady-of-la-salette-01.jpg?1505844039)

ʝʊdɛօ-Bolshevik Church, Communist Party Church, Neo-Trotskyist Church, aka the Great Apostasy
vs.
Catholic Nationalist Church, Pan-European Roman Church, Catholic Church newly resurrected from the mystic death of the eclipsed Remnant Church

Perhaps Bishop Williamson is being a bit too passively gloomy in imagining that Catholics need their clergy to in effect man the barricades and go down machine guns blazing.  After all, a Catholic laity actually does exist and is entirely capable of dealing with any and all such political-military temporal matters.

There is great actual need among Catholics for their existing Catholic clergy (never to be confused with the ʝʊdɛօ-Bolshevik, Neo-Trotskyist clergy now ensconced in the Vatican) to be serious men who do their actual existing duty.  Namely, Catholics greatly need a Catholic episcopacy that would focus their efforts on a contemporary and effective Catholic Nationalist education and pedagogy.  Then our existing contemporary Catholic laymen could deal with the more temporal occurrences of any possible or actual heroic warrior death and dying.  In any event, the opportunities for martyrdom are very largely behind us by now and the good Bishop Williamson has sadly missed the boat for receiving the graces of a heroic baptism of blood.

It seems to this lowly blogger that Bishop Williamson is ready and eager for the pontificate of Pope Paul VI, of universally unlamented memory.  There were some courageous Catholic clergy who did then give their lives for the glorious Kingship of Christ.  But Pope Paul VI is long gone and we are now in the year 2018, not 1978.  At present Marxism is actually dead as a doornail, the obstacles in our way are in spiritual terms mere crumbled piles of rubble and the time is now for Catholics to cheerfully get to work and take the world by storm.  Essentially through superior Catholic noble education and noble episcopacy, not through hopelessly nostalgic repetitions of past persecutions that are already happily gone and done with.

The Catholic Resistance should not nostalgically stagnate in replays of the 20th Century blues, but be humble enough to be grateful and rejoice in the much more joyful realities of our own 21st Century.  We ought not timidly quiver in fear of the phantom shadows of a bygone age, but instead have the humble courage to be serious men and women and build up a new civilisation on the ruins of the old destroyed one.
  
The great Catholic writer Ernst Junger said the 21st Century would be the Age of Titans, and the 22nd Century the Age of the Gods.  Time now for Catholic adults to live like Titans, and stop living in the past like timid Catholics of the late 20th Century living in fear of ghosts of things long dead that no longer even exist.

Maranatha!
Title: Re: Eleison Comments - Official Church? (No. 551)
Post by: Neil Obstat on February 05, 2018, 01:29:10 PM
.
Speaking of which, something isn't right here.
.
(http://sspx.org/sites/sspx/files/styles/news_big/public/news/main.jpg)
.
The level of the wine surface is off. Couldn't be a steady grip. His hand must have been moving when the photo was taken.
.
Title: Re: Eleison Comments - Official Church? (No. 551)
Post by: 2Vermont on February 05, 2018, 03:09:46 PM

Sorry, Bishop Williamson.  Your comment below is not much clearer than "official Church" for it suggests that the "Conciliar Church" is part of the One,True Catholic Church:


For on the one hand “Conciliar Church” signifies clearly that large part of today’s Church which is more or less poisoned with the errors of the Second Vatican Council.
Title: Re: Eleison Comments - Official Church? (No. 551)
Post by: Incredulous on February 05, 2018, 07:13:06 PM


Great post Franciscan Solitary!

Who will give us the Sodom & Gomorrah scale chastisements and lead the paralyzed Catholic remnant ?

None other, than God the Holy Ghost and the Blessed Virgin Mary.
Title: Re: Eleison Comments - Official Church? (No. 551)
Post by: Franciscan Solitary on February 05, 2018, 09:22:39 PM

Great post Franciscan Solitary!

Who will give us the Sodom & Gomorrah scale chastisements and lead the paralyzed Catholic remnant ?

None other, than God the Holy Ghost and the Blessed Virgin Mary.
Absolutely!
  
In more religious terms what will save the Catholic Remnant is certainly the Franciscan theology and practices recommended for us by St. Grignon de Montfort, Padre Pio and St. Maximilian Kolbe:  The Holy Ghost as the Uncreated Immaculate Conception and the Blessed Virgin Mother of God as the created Immaculate Conception.  All of which, by the way, in more temporal terms equates with Catholic Nationalist racial science and the singular value of racial purity for the entire human race, in that respect for every race and nation equally.  It is timely for Catholics to appreciate that the mainstream Catholic heritage has always been noble and aristocratic in nature.  Everything common has been allowed (very unlike with the historic Pagans) and even generously pampered, but has nevertheless also always been secondary to the predominant noble and warrior core of our Roman or Pan-European heritage.

The Marian Apparitions have a militant Catholic Nationalist side to them.  That is why the Left has always opposed them so fanatically.  The Virgin of Guadalupe has much to do with the Spanish Reconquista and Pan-American Hispanidad.  Our Lady of Lourdes has much to do with the unique value of French civilisation, and Norman English and British-American Anglo-French civilisation too.  Our Lady of Fatima has everything to do with the many incomparable heroic tragedies of Catholicism last century.  In Catholic prophecy our own 21st Century is the time of the Knighthood of the Holy Ghost and, needless to say, the Marian Militia that is the contemporary Catholic Remnant of the End Time.

Only Our Lord Himself can save us and He only comes to us in and through the Blessed Virgin.  Which on the temporal level also means that He also comes to us in and through Catholic Nationalism and the Roman Catholic racial wisdom and noble courage thereof.  As relatively fallen human beings Our Lord comes to us through noble Roman Pan-European racial good breeding and through the good manners and racial purity of Our Lady the Divine Mother of God.  No less.

De Maria numquam satis!

Title: Re: Eleison Comments - Official Church? (No. 551)
Post by: SeanJohnson on February 05, 2018, 10:01:44 PM
Absolutely!
  
In more religious terms what will save the Catholic Remnant is certainly the Franciscan theology and practices recommended for us by St. Grignon de Montfort, Padre Pio and St. Maximilian Kolbe:  The Holy Ghost as the Uncreated Immaculate Conception and the Blessed Virgin Mother of God as the created Immaculate Conception.  All of which, by the way, in more temporal terms equates with Catholic Nationalist racial science and the singular value of racial purity for the entire human race, in that respect for every race and nation equally.  It is timely for Catholics to appreciate that the mainstream Catholic heritage has always been noble and aristocratic in nature.  Everything common has been allowed (very unlike with the historic Pagans) and even generously pampered, but has nevertheless also always been secondary to the predominant noble and warrior core of our Roman or Pan-European heritage.

The Marian Apparitions have a militant Catholic Nationalist side to them.  That is why the Left has always opposed them so fanatically.  The Virgin of Guadalupe has much to do with the Spanish Reconquista and Pan-American Hispanidad.  Our Lady of Lourdes has much to do with the unique value of French civilisation, and Norman English and British-American Anglo-French civilisation too.  Our Lady of Fatima has everything to do with the many incomparable heroic tragedies of Catholicism last century.  In Catholic prophecy our own 21st Century is the time of the Knighthood of the Holy Ghost and, needless to say, the Marian Militia that is the contemporary Catholic Remnant of the End Time.

Only Our Lord Himself can save us and He only comes to us in and through the Blessed Virgin.  Which on the temporal level also means that He also comes to us in and through Catholic Nationalism and the Roman Catholic racial wisdom and noble courage thereof.  As relatively fallen human beings Our Lord comes to us through noble Roman Pan-European racial good breeding and through the good manners and racial purity of Our Lady the Divine Mother of God.  No less.

De Maria numquam satis!
Hmm...."Marian Militia".....I like that....
Title: Re: Eleison Comments - Official Church? (No. 551)
Post by: Marlelar on February 05, 2018, 11:38:39 PM
Some commentary:

http://sodalitium-pianum.com/eleison-comments-551-official-church-brief-commentary-follows/
from Sean's blog post: "Finally, the rumor that the next superior general may not be a bishop is interesting.  It means that the next leader of the SSPX will not possess within himself the principal of continuity (i.e., the ability to consecrate bishops).  The matter is important, because if this Rome-approved superior general should ever have a belated lapse in favor of Tradition, and try to break free from the Roman chains, he will not be able to threaten conciliar Rome with consecrating his own successors, but will instead have to convince the other future Roman-picked bishops of the SSPX to go along with him, which would be very unlikely to succeed."


Thank you for pointing this out Sean, it had not occurred to me.
Title: Re: Eleison Comments - Official Church? (No. 551)
Post by: Kazimierz on February 06, 2018, 12:38:19 AM
As I have written before, you cannot spell Conciliar without LIAR! ;D
THE FATHER OF LIES is behind it all, which all but the spiritually obtuse can easily grasp.

Thumbs up to the mention of cigars and cognac. Plenty of great cheeses that do not explode thy nose from thy face but the really good stuff is never exported.So much good French food. Alas the French neo-sspx French clergy who slouch like rough beasts toward Rome, to be re-born as God knows what.
Title: Re: Eleison Comments - Official Church? (No. 551)
Post by: hollingsworth on February 06, 2018, 01:22:19 PM

Quote
The Marian Apparitions have a militant Catholic Nationalist side to them.  That is why the Left has always opposed them so fanatically...
FS is on to something.  There is the ring of truth about everything he writes here, though I do not pretend that I understand all the difficult phraseology.  Simply, that Mary is the way ahead for true Catholic reconquest.
 
Quote
 Our Lady of Fatima has everything to do with the many incomparable heroic tragedies of Catholicism last century.  In Catholic prophecy our own 21st Century is the time of the Knighthood of the Holy Ghost and, needless to say, the Marian Militia that is the contemporary Catholic Remnant of the End Time.
Yes, yes, and yes! To Jesus through Mary.  He has been pleased to appoint the Most Blessed Virgin, His Mother to be our Mother also, and our Mediatrix with Thee, i.e. to receive all of God's graces through Her.  This is basically what Fr. Fuentes conveyed to us after his interview with Sr. Lucy in 1957:
 
"Finally, devotion to the Immaculate Heart of Mary, Our Most Holy Mother, consists in considering Her as the seat of mercy, of goodness, and of pardon and the certain door by which we are to enter Heaven."

Most Catholics, I fear, traditional or otherwise, have but the foggiest idea what Father could possibly have meant. Words like this cost Fr. Fuentes his postulatorship. His Catholic superiors wouldn't hear them.  The poor Protestant will search frantically through the pages of his Bible for literal confirmation of these marvelous, though almost incomprehensible words.  He will not find them in a single passage or specific verse of Scripture that he can readily comprehend.  And that would do it for him.  "Those heretical Catholics are at it again," he would conclude.   

Quote
Only Our Lord Himself can save us and He only comes to us in and through the Blessed Virgin.
Well, Shazaam!
Title: Re: Eleison Comments - Official Church? (No. 551)
Post by: Marlelar on February 06, 2018, 02:43:25 PM
Quote
The great Catholic writer Ernst Junger ...
I think it should be clarified that Junger was a writer who became Catholic - at the ripe old age of 101, just one year before he died.
Title: Re: Eleison Comments - Official Church? (No. 551)
Post by: Incredulous on February 06, 2018, 06:47:08 PM
I think it should be clarified that Junger was a writer who became Catholic - at the ripe old age of 101, just one year before he died.

Thanks for pointing him out Marlelar.
I didn't know of Junger, but what an independent, inquisitive character he was?

In 1930 he wrote a book explaining how the Jєωs were a threat to Germany.  
He was also considered a sympathizer of Col. Clause Von Stauffenberg, the daring Catholic, who tried to blow-up Hitler.

I'd like to know more about details his Catholic conversion?  What a roundabout, "pilgrimage of grace" he had ?

Metapedia link (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Ernst_J%C3%BCnger)

Ernst Jünger

(http://en.metapedia.org/m/images/thumb/c/c5/Ernst_J%C3%BCnger.png/180px-Ernst_J%C3%BCnger.png) (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/File:Ernst_J%C3%BCnger.png)

                                                                                                              Ernst Junger

Ernst Jünger (29 March 1895 – 17 February 1998 was a German (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Germans) writer (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=Writer&action=edit&redlink=1). In addition to his novels (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=Novel&action=edit&redlink=1) and diaries (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=Diary&action=edit&redlink=1), he is well known for Storm of Steel (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=Storm_of_Steel&action=edit&redlink=1), an account of his experience during World War I (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/World_War_I).


Biography
Jünger was born in Heidelberg (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=Heidelberg&action=edit&redlink=1) to a middle class family, and grew up in Hannover (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Hannover) as the son of a chemical engineer who later became a pharmacist. He attended school from 1901 to 1913, and was a member of the Wandervogel (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=Wandervogel&action=edit&redlink=1) movement. In 1913, he ran away from home to join the French Foreign Legion (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/French_Foreign_Legion) in which he served very briefly in North Africa (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/North_Africa). During World War I (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/World_War_I) he served with distinction in the Imperial German Army (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/German_Army) on the Western Front (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Western_Front_(WWI)). In the first week of January 1917 he was awarded the Iron Cross First Class (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Iron_Cross) and in September 1918 was awarded Prussia (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Prussia)'s highest military decoration of that time, the Pour le Mérite (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Pour_le_M%C3%A9rite) (informally known as the "Blue Max"). This he received as a Lieutenant at the age of 23.

His war experiences are first described in Storm of Steel (German title: In Stahlgewittern) which was published in 1920 (self-published). This book by which Jünger became suddenly famous has been seen as glorifying war. Jünger served as a lieutenant (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=Lieutenant&action=edit&redlink=1) in the army of the Weimar Republic (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Weimar_Republic) until his demobilisation (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=Demobilisation&action=edit&redlink=1) in 1923. He studied marine biology (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=Marine_biology&action=edit&redlink=1), zoology (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=Zoology&action=edit&redlink=1), botany (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=Botany&action=edit&redlink=1), and philosophy (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Philosophy), and became a well-known entomologist (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=Entomologist&action=edit&redlink=1). He married Gretha von Jeinsen (1906–1960) in 1925; they had two children, Ernst (1926–1944) and Alexander (1934–1993).

In the 1920s Jünger published articles in several right-wing (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Right-wing) nationalist (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Nationalism) journals, and further novels. As in Storm of Steel, in the book Feuer und Blut (1925, "Fire and Blood"), Jünger glorified war as an internal event. According to Jünger, war elevates the soldier's life, isolated from normal humanity, into a mystical experience. The extremities of modern military techniques tested the capacity of the human senses. He criticized the fragile and unstable democracy (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Democracy) of the Weimar Republic (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Weimar_Republic), stating that he "hated democracy like the plague." 

Although never a member of the National Socialist (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/National_Socialist_German_Workers_Party) movement around Adolf Hitler (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Adolf_Hitler), Jünger never publicly criticized the regime before the war. Jünger however refused a chair offered to him in the Reichstag following the nαzι Party's ascension to power in 1933, and he refused the invitation to head the German Academy of Literature (Die deutsche Akademie der Dichtung). Even though he never endorsed the nαzι Party, and indeed kept them at a careful distance, Jünger's Storm of Steel sold well into the six-figure range by the end of the 1930s. In the essay On Pain (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=On_Pain&action=edit&redlink=1), written and published in 1934, Jünger rejects the liberal values of liberty, security, ease, and comfort, and seeks instead the measure of man in the capacity to withstand pain and sacrifice.

In 1927 he moved to Berlin (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Berlin). In 1929 his work The Adventurous Heart (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=The_Adventurous_Heart&action=edit&redlink=1) (German title: Das abenteuerliche Herz) was published. In Über Nationalismus und Judenfrage (1930, "On Nationalism and the Jєωιѕн Question"), Jünger describes Jєωs (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Jєω) as a threat for the unity of Germans (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Germans). In 1932 he published The Worker (German title: Der Arbeiter), which called for the creation of a totally mobilized society run by warrior-worker-scholars. 

Jünger left Berlin (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Berlin) in 1933, his house was searched by the Gestapo (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Gestapo) secret police, and from 1938 he was banned by the nαzιs from writing. On the Marble Cliffs (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=On_the_Marble_Cliffs&action=edit&redlink=1) (1939, German title: Auf den Marmorklippen) uses metaphor (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=Metaphor&action=edit&redlink=1) to describe Jünger's negative perceptions of the situation in Hitler's Germany. He served in World War II (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/World_War_II) as an army captain (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=Captain_(OF-2)&action=edit&redlink=1). Assigned to an administrative position in Paris, he socialized with prominent artists of the day such as Picasso (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=Picasso&action=edit&redlink=1) and Jean Cocteau (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=Jean_Cocteau&action=edit&redlink=1). His early time in France is described in his diary Gärten und Straßen (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=G%C3%A4rten_und_Stra%C3%9Fen&action=edit&redlink=1) (1942, Gardens and Streets).

Jünger appears on the fringes of the Stauffenberg bomb plot (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/July_20_Plot). He was clearly an inspiration to anti-nαzι conservatives in the German Army[citation needed (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Metapedia:Citation_needed)], and while in Paris he was close to the old, mostly Prussian (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Kingdom_of_Prussia) officers who carried out the assassination attempt against Hitler. He was only peripherally involved in the events however, and in the aftermath suffered only dismissal from the army in the summer of 1944, rather than execution.

His elder son Ernst Jr., then a Kriegsmarine (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Kriegsmarine) cadet (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=Cadet&action=edit&redlink=1), was imprisoned that year for engaging in "subversive discussions" in his Wilhelmshaven (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=Wilhelmshaven&action=edit&redlink=1) Naval Academy. Transferred to Penal Unit (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=Strafbattalion&action=edit&redlink=1) 999 (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=999th_Light_Afrika_Division_(Germany)&action=edit&redlink=1), he was killed near Carrara (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=Carrara&action=edit&redlink=1) in occupied Italy (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Italian_Social_Republic) on 29 November.
(http://en.metapedia.org/m/images/thumb/f/ff/Junger-2.jpg/180px-Junger-2.jpg) (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/File:Junger-2.jpg)
                                                                                                               Ernst Junger 2
[size={defaultattr}][font={defaultattr}]
After the war, Jünger was initially under some suspicion for his nationalist past, and he was banned from publishing in Germany for four years by the British occupying forces because he refused to submit to the denαzιfication procedures. His work The Peace (German title: Der Friede), written in 1943 and published abroad in 1947, marked the end of his involvement in politics. [/font][/size]

[size={defaultattr}][font={defaultattr}]Rehabilitated by the 1950s, he went on to be regarded as a towering figure of German literature. German publisher Klett put out a ten-volume Collected Works (Sämtliche Werke) in 1965. The same publishers issued a second edition in 1983, turning Jünger into one of four German authors who lived to see two editions of his Collected Works published; the other three are Goethe, Klopstock, and Wieland. He remained highly controversial, though, in the eyes of the German Marxist Left, both for his past, and his ongoing role as conservative philosopher and icon. Jünger was immensely popular in France, where at one time 48 of his translated books were in print. In 1984, he spoke at the Verdun memorial, alongside with his admirers, French president François Mitterrand (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Fran%C3%A7ois_Mitterrand) and German chancellor Helmut Kohl (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Helmut_Kohl).[/font][/size]
[size={defaultattr}][font={defaultattr}]
His diaries from 1939 to 1949 were published under the title Strahlungen (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=Strahlungen_(Ernst_J%C3%BCnger)&action=edit&redlink=1) (1948, Reflections). In the 1950s and 1960s Jünger travelled extensively. His first wife, Gretha, died in 1960, and in 1962 he married Liselotte Lohrer. He continued writing prodigiously for his entire life, publishing more than 50 books.[/font][/size]
[size={defaultattr}][font={defaultattr}]
Jünger was among the forerunners of magical realism (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=Magical_realism&action=edit&redlink=1). His vision in The Glass Bees (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=The_Glass_Bees&action=edit&redlink=1) (1957, German title: Gläserne Bienen), of a future in which an overmechanized world threatens individualism, could be seen as science fiction (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=Science_fiction&action=edit&redlink=1). A sensitive poet with training in botany and zoology, as well as a soldier, his works in general are infused with tremendous details of the natural world. His critics claim there is an excess of emotional control and precision in his writing. In 1981 he was awarded the Prix mondial Cino Del Duca (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=Prix_mondial_Cino_Del_Duca&action=edit&redlink=1).
Throughout his whole life he had experimented with drugs (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=Psychoactive_drug&action=edit&redlink=1) such as ether (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=Diethyl_ether&action=edit&redlink=1), cocaine (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=Cocaine&action=edit&redlink=1), and hashish (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=Hashish&action=edit&redlink=1); and later in life he used mescaline (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=Mescaline&action=edit&redlink=1) and LSD (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=LSD&action=edit&redlink=1). These experiments were recorded comprehensively in Annäherungen (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=Ann%C3%A4herungen&action=edit&redlink=1) (1970, Approaches). [/font][/size]

[size={defaultattr}][font={defaultattr}]The novel Besuch auf Godenholm (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=Besuch_auf_Godenholm&action=edit&redlink=1) (1952, Visit to Godenholm) is clearly influenced by his early experiments with mescaline (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=Mescaline&action=edit&redlink=1) and LSD (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=LSD&action=edit&redlink=1). He met several times with LSD inventor Albert Hofmann (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=Albert_Hofmann&action=edit&redlink=1) and they took LSD together. Hofmann's memoir LSD, My Problem Child (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=LSD,_My_Problem_Child&action=edit&redlink=1) describes some of these meetings.[/font][/size]
[size={defaultattr}][font={defaultattr}]
One of his most important literary contributions was the metahistoric figure of the Anarch (sovereign individual) (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=Anarch_(sovereign_individual)&action=edit&redlink=1), which evolved from his earlier conception of the Waldgaenger, or Forest Fleer. The anarch is Jünger's answer to the question of survival of individual freedom in a totalitarian world. It is developed primarily through the character of Martin Venator in his novel Eumeswil (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=Eumeswil&action=edit&redlink=1).
Jünger's 100th birthday on 29 March 1995, was met with praise from many quarters, including the socialist (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=Socialist_Party_(France)&action=edit&redlink=1) French president (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=French_president&action=edit&redlink=1) François Mitterrand (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Fran%C3%A7ois_Mitterrand).[/font][/size]
[size={defaultattr}][font={defaultattr}]
Jünger was a friend of Martin Heidegger (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Martin_Heidegger). Jünger was admired by Julius Evola (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Julius_Evola) who published a book called L'Operaio nel pensiero di Ernst Juenger (1960), in which he summarized The Worker.[/font][/size]
[size={defaultattr}][font={defaultattr}]
A year before his death Jünger converted to Catholicism (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Roman_Catholic_Church) and began to receive the Sacraments (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=Sacrament&action=edit&redlink=1).
Ernst Jünger died on 17 February 1998 in Riedlingen (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=Riedlingen&action=edit&redlink=1), Upper Swabia (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=Upper_Swabia&action=edit&redlink=1), the last living bearer of the military version of the order of the Pour le Mérite (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Pour_le_M%C3%A9rite).[/font][/size]
[size={defaultattr}][font={defaultattr}]
His brother Friedrich Georg Jünger (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Friedrich_Georg_J%C3%BCnger) (1898–1977) was a poet and essayist. His younger son Alexander, a physician, committed ѕυιcιdє in 1993.[/font][/size]
[size={defaultattr}][font={defaultattr}]
Despite the controversy surrounding his life, Jünger said he never regretted anything he wrote, nor would he ever take it back.
Yet he joined Chancellor Helmut Kohl (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Helmut_Kohl) and President François Mitterrand (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Fran%C3%A7ois_Mitterrand) of France at a 1984 Franco-German ceremony at Verdun (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=Verdun&action=edit&redlink=1), France, where he called the ideology of war in Germany before and after World War I "a calamitous mistake".[/font][/size]
[size={defaultattr}][font={defaultattr}]
Right-Wing Criticism of Ernst Junger
Julius Evola (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Julius_Evola) pointed out in his autobiography The Path of Cinnabar (Excerpt online: "Junger: From 'Conservative Revolutionary' to Sluggishly Liberal & Humanistic" (http://www.juliusevola.net/excerpts/Junger_-_from_Conservative_Revolutionary_to_Sluggishly_Liberal_%26_Humanistic.html)) the negative transformation in philosophical thought which Ernst Junger had undergone after World War II:[/font][/size]
Quote
"On the other hand, over the years Jünger has come to distance himself from the book I had introduced to the Italian public, and has abandoned his original views. While the most recent writing of Jünger has significantly contributed towards his fame as a writer and man of letters, on a spiritual level it reflects a lapse: both for its merely literary and aesthetic nature, and because it betrays the influence of ideas of a different, and often antithetical sort from the ones that inform The Worker and other early books of Jünger. It is as if the spiritual drive that Jünger had derived from his life in the trenches of the First World War, and applied on an intellectual level, had gradually run out. Besides, not only did Jünger play no significant role during the Second World War, but it also appears that, when in service in occupied France, he got in touch with those members of the Wehrmacht who in 1944 attempted to murder Hitler. Jünger, therefore, should be numbered among those individuals who first subscribed to 'Conservative Revolutionary' ideas but were later, in a way, traumatized by the National Socialist experience, to the point of being led to embrace the kind of sluggishly liberal and humanistic ideas which conformed to the dominant attempt 'to democratically reform' their country; individuals who have proven incapable of distinguishing the positive side of past ideas from the negative, and of remaining true to the former. Alas, this incapability to discern is, in a way, typical of contemporary Germany (the land of the 'economic miracle')."
[size={defaultattr}][font={defaultattr}]
More recently, Will Fredericks, in his article "The Conservative Revolution Then and Now: Ernst Junger" (link (http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2012/02/the-conservative-revolution-then-and-now-ernst-junger/)) has pointed out the following:[/font][/size]
Quote
Jünger’s writings returned to the world of the civilian and the individual, to the preservation of freedom against totalitarianism. At least in this respect, the later Jünger seems to certainly help fulfill Sunic’s search for nonconformist weapons of dissent against today’s multicultural tyranny. The question I have is to what extent, if any, is Jünger’s later thinking representative of or supportive of traditionalism, let alone White nationalism. While he differentiates his Anarch figure from anarchism, it still seems to share certain basic characteristics of anarchistic thought which utterly oppose it to traditionalism or White nationalism. Indeed, Simon Friedrich, an expert on Jünger, characterized Jünger’s position as follows. “ALL external identifications, not excluding racial ones, are ultimately to be separated from”, leading a reader to ask: “So if we have to get rid of our identifications, what are we left with?” Jünger had become a radical individualist.
[size={defaultattr}][font={defaultattr}]
Writings

Selected Works[/font][/size]
Title: Re: Eleison Comments - Official Church? (No. 551)
Post by: Franciscan Solitary on February 10, 2018, 01:26:26 PM
Thanks for pointing him out Marlelar.
I didn't know of Junger, but what an independent, inquisitive character he was?

In 1930 he wrote a book explaining how the Jєωs were a threat to Germany.  
He was also considered a sympathizer of Col. Clause Von Stauffenberg, the daring Catholic, who tried to blow-up Hitler.

I'd like to know more about details his Catholic conversion?  What a roundabout, "pilgrimage of grace" he had ?

Metapedia link (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Ernst_J%C3%BCnger)

Ernst Jünger

(http://en.metapedia.org/m/images/thumb/c/c5/Ernst_J%C3%BCnger.png/180px-Ernst_J%C3%BCnger.png) (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/File:Ernst_J%C3%BCnger.png)

                                                                                                             Ernst Junger

Ernst Jünger (29 March 1895 – 17 February 1998 was a German (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Germans) writer (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=Writer&action=edit&redlink=1). In addition to his novels (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=Novel&action=edit&redlink=1) and diaries (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=Diary&action=edit&redlink=1), he is well known for Storm of Steel (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=Storm_of_Steel&action=edit&redlink=1), an account of his experience during World War I (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/World_War_I).


Biography
Jünger was born in Heidelberg (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=Heidelberg&action=edit&redlink=1) to a middle class family, and grew up in Hannover (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Hannover) as the son of a chemical engineer who later became a pharmacist. He attended school from 1901 to 1913, and was a member of the Wandervogel (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=Wandervogel&action=edit&redlink=1) movement. In 1913, he ran away from home to join the French Foreign Legion (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/French_Foreign_Legion) in which he served very briefly in North Africa (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/North_Africa). During World War I (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/World_War_I) he served with distinction in the Imperial German Army (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/German_Army) on the Western Front (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Western_Front_(WWI)). In the first week of January 1917 he was awarded the Iron Cross First Class (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Iron_Cross) and in September 1918 was awarded Prussia (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Prussia)'s highest military decoration of that time, the Pour le Mérite (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Pour_le_M%C3%A9rite) (informally known as the "Blue Max"). This he received as a Lieutenant at the age of 23.

His war experiences are first described in Storm of Steel (German title: In Stahlgewittern) which was published in 1920 (self-published). This book by which Jünger became suddenly famous has been seen as glorifying war. Jünger served as a lieutenant (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=Lieutenant&action=edit&redlink=1) in the army of the Weimar Republic (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Weimar_Republic) until his demobilisation (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=Demobilisation&action=edit&redlink=1) in 1923. He studied marine biology (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=Marine_biology&action=edit&redlink=1), zoology (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=Zoology&action=edit&redlink=1), botany (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=Botany&action=edit&redlink=1), and philosophy (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Philosophy), and became a well-known entomologist (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=Entomologist&action=edit&redlink=1). He married Gretha von Jeinsen (1906–1960) in 1925; they had two children, Ernst (1926–1944) and Alexander (1934–1993).

In the 1920s Jünger published articles in several right-wing (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Right-wing) nationalist (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Nationalism) journals, and further novels. As in Storm of Steel, in the book Feuer und Blut (1925, "Fire and Blood"), Jünger glorified war as an internal event. According to Jünger, war elevates the soldier's life, isolated from normal humanity, into a mystical experience. The extremities of modern military techniques tested the capacity of the human senses. He criticized the fragile and unstable democracy (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Democracy) of the Weimar Republic (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Weimar_Republic), stating that he "hated democracy like the plague."

Although never a member of the National Socialist (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/National_Socialist_German_Workers_Party) movement around Adolf Hitler (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Adolf_Hitler), Jünger never publicly criticized the regime before the war. Jünger however refused a chair offered to him in the Reichstag following the nαzι Party's ascension to power in 1933, and he refused the invitation to head the German Academy of Literature (Die deutsche Akademie der Dichtung). Even though he never endorsed the nαzι Party, and indeed kept them at a careful distance, Jünger's Storm of Steel sold well into the six-figure range by the end of the 1930s. In the essay On Pain (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=On_Pain&action=edit&redlink=1), written and published in 1934, Jünger rejects the liberal values of liberty, security, ease, and comfort, and seeks instead the measure of man in the capacity to withstand pain and sacrifice.

In 1927 he moved to Berlin (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Berlin). In 1929 his work The Adventurous Heart (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=The_Adventurous_Heart&action=edit&redlink=1) (German title: Das abenteuerliche Herz) was published. In Über Nationalismus und Judenfrage (1930, "On Nationalism and the Jєωιѕн Question"), Jünger describes Jєωs (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Jєω) as a threat for the unity of Germans (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Germans). In 1932 he published The Worker (German title: Der Arbeiter), which called for the creation of a totally mobilized society run by warrior-worker-scholars.

Jünger left Berlin (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Berlin) in 1933, his house was searched by the Gestapo (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Gestapo) secret police, and from 1938 he was banned by the nαzιs from writing. On the Marble Cliffs (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=On_the_Marble_Cliffs&action=edit&redlink=1) (1939, German title: Auf den Marmorklippen) uses metaphor (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=Metaphor&action=edit&redlink=1) to describe Jünger's negative perceptions of the situation in Hitler's Germany. He served in World War II (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/World_War_II) as an army captain (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=Captain_(OF-2)&action=edit&redlink=1). Assigned to an administrative position in Paris, he socialized with prominent artists of the day such as Picasso (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=Picasso&action=edit&redlink=1) and Jean Cocteau (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=Jean_Cocteau&action=edit&redlink=1). His early time in France is described in his diary Gärten und Straßen (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=G%C3%A4rten_und_Stra%C3%9Fen&action=edit&redlink=1) (1942, Gardens and Streets).

Jünger appears on the fringes of the Stauffenberg bomb plot (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/July_20_Plot). He was clearly an inspiration to anti-nαzι conservatives in the German Army[citation needed (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Metapedia:Citation_needed)], and while in Paris he was close to the old, mostly Prussian (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Kingdom_of_Prussia) officers who carried out the assassination attempt against Hitler. He was only peripherally involved in the events however, and in the aftermath suffered only dismissal from the army in the summer of 1944, rather than execution.

His elder son Ernst Jr., then a Kriegsmarine (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Kriegsmarine) cadet (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=Cadet&action=edit&redlink=1), was imprisoned that year for engaging in "subversive discussions" in his Wilhelmshaven (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=Wilhelmshaven&action=edit&redlink=1) Naval Academy. Transferred to Penal Unit (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=Strafbattalion&action=edit&redlink=1) 999 (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=999th_Light_Afrika_Division_(Germany)&action=edit&redlink=1), he was killed near Carrara (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=Carrara&action=edit&redlink=1) in occupied Italy (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Italian_Social_Republic) on 29 November.
(http://en.metapedia.org/m/images/thumb/f/ff/Junger-2.jpg/180px-Junger-2.jpg) (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/File:Junger-2.jpg)
                                                                                                              Ernst Junger 2
[size={defaultattr}][font={defaultattr}]
After the war, Jünger was initially under some suspicion for his nationalist past, and he was banned from publishing in Germany for four years by the British occupying forces because he refused to submit to the denαzιfication procedures. His work The Peace (German title: Der Friede), written in 1943 and published abroad in 1947, marked the end of his involvement in politics. [/font][/size]

[size={defaultattr}][font={defaultattr}]Rehabilitated by the 1950s, he went on to be regarded as a towering figure of German literature. German publisher Klett put out a ten-volume Collected Works (Sämtliche Werke) in 1965. The same publishers issued a second edition in 1983, turning Jünger into one of four German authors who lived to see two editions of his Collected Works published; the other three are Goethe, Klopstock, and Wieland. He remained highly controversial, though, in the eyes of the German Marxist Left, both for his past, and his ongoing role as conservative philosopher and icon. Jünger was immensely popular in France, where at one time 48 of his translated books were in print. In 1984, he spoke at the Verdun memorial, alongside with his admirers, French president François Mitterrand (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Fran%C3%A7ois_Mitterrand) and German chancellor Helmut Kohl (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Helmut_Kohl).[/font][/size]
[size={defaultattr}][font={defaultattr}]
His diaries from 1939 to 1949 were published under the title Strahlungen (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=Strahlungen_(Ernst_J%C3%BCnger)&action=edit&redlink=1) (1948, Reflections). In the 1950s and 1960s Jünger travelled extensively. His first wife, Gretha, died in 1960, and in 1962 he married Liselotte Lohrer. He continued writing prodigiously for his entire life, publishing more than 50 books.[/font][/size]
[size={defaultattr}][font={defaultattr}]
Jünger was among the forerunners of magical realism (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=Magical_realism&action=edit&redlink=1). His vision in The Glass Bees (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=The_Glass_Bees&action=edit&redlink=1) (1957, German title: Gläserne Bienen), of a future in which an overmechanized world threatens individualism, could be seen as science fiction (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=Science_fiction&action=edit&redlink=1). A sensitive poet with training in botany and zoology, as well as a soldier, his works in general are infused with tremendous details of the natural world. His critics claim there is an excess of emotional control and precision in his writing. In 1981 he was awarded the Prix mondial Cino Del Duca (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=Prix_mondial_Cino_Del_Duca&action=edit&redlink=1).
Throughout his whole life he had experimented with drugs (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=Psychoactive_drug&action=edit&redlink=1) such as ether (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=Diethyl_ether&action=edit&redlink=1), cocaine (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=Cocaine&action=edit&redlink=1), and hashish (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=Hashish&action=edit&redlink=1); and later in life he used mescaline (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=Mescaline&action=edit&redlink=1) and LSD (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=LSD&action=edit&redlink=1). These experiments were recorded comprehensively in Annäherungen (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=Ann%C3%A4herungen&action=edit&redlink=1) (1970, Approaches). [/font][/size]

[size={defaultattr}][font={defaultattr}]The novel Besuch auf Godenholm (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=Besuch_auf_Godenholm&action=edit&redlink=1) (1952, Visit to Godenholm) is clearly influenced by his early experiments with mescaline (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=Mescaline&action=edit&redlink=1) and LSD (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=LSD&action=edit&redlink=1). He met several times with LSD inventor Albert Hofmann (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=Albert_Hofmann&action=edit&redlink=1) and they took LSD together. Hofmann's memoir LSD, My Problem Child (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=LSD,_My_Problem_Child&action=edit&redlink=1) describes some of these meetings.[/font][/size]
[size={defaultattr}][font={defaultattr}]
One of his most important literary contributions was the metahistoric figure of the Anarch (sovereign individual) (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=Anarch_(sovereign_individual)&action=edit&redlink=1), which evolved from his earlier conception of the Waldgaenger, or Forest Fleer. The anarch is Jünger's answer to the question of survival of individual freedom in a totalitarian world. It is developed primarily through the character of Martin Venator in his novel Eumeswil (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=Eumeswil&action=edit&redlink=1).
Jünger's 100th birthday on 29 March 1995, was met with praise from many quarters, including the socialist (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=Socialist_Party_(France)&action=edit&redlink=1) French president (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=French_president&action=edit&redlink=1) François Mitterrand (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Fran%C3%A7ois_Mitterrand).[/font][/size]
[size={defaultattr}][font={defaultattr}]
Jünger was a friend of Martin Heidegger (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Martin_Heidegger). Jünger was admired by Julius Evola (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Julius_Evola) who published a book called L'Operaio nel pensiero di Ernst Juenger (1960), in which he summarized The Worker.[/font][/size]
[size={defaultattr}][font={defaultattr}]
A year before his death Jünger converted to Catholicism (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Roman_Catholic_Church) and began to receive the Sacraments (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=Sacrament&action=edit&redlink=1).
Ernst Jünger died on 17 February 1998 in Riedlingen (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=Riedlingen&action=edit&redlink=1), Upper Swabia (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=Upper_Swabia&action=edit&redlink=1), the last living bearer of the military version of the order of the Pour le Mérite (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Pour_le_M%C3%A9rite).[/font][/size]
[size={defaultattr}][font={defaultattr}]
His brother Friedrich Georg Jünger (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Friedrich_Georg_J%C3%BCnger) (1898–1977) was a poet and essayist. His younger son Alexander, a physician, committed ѕυιcιdє in 1993.[/font][/size]
[size={defaultattr}][font={defaultattr}]
Despite the controversy surrounding his life, Jünger said he never regretted anything he wrote, nor would he ever take it back.
Yet he joined Chancellor Helmut Kohl (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Helmut_Kohl) and President François Mitterrand (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Fran%C3%A7ois_Mitterrand) of France at a 1984 Franco-German ceremony at Verdun (http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=Verdun&action=edit&redlink=1), France, where he called the ideology of war in Germany before and after World War I "a calamitous mistake".[/font][/size]
[size={defaultattr}][font={defaultattr}]
Right-Wing Criticism of Ernst Junger
Julius Evola (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Julius_Evola) pointed out in his autobiography The Path of Cinnabar (Excerpt online: "Junger: From 'Conservative Revolutionary' to Sluggishly Liberal & Humanistic" (http://www.juliusevola.net/excerpts/Junger_-_from_Conservative_Revolutionary_to_Sluggishly_Liberal_%26_Humanistic.html)) the negative transformation in philosophical thought which Ernst Junger had undergone after World War II:[/font][/size][size={defaultattr}][font={defaultattr}]
More recently, Will Fredericks, in his article "The Conservative Revolution Then and Now: Ernst Junger" (link (http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2012/02/the-conservative-revolution-then-and-now-ernst-junger/)) has pointed out the following:[/font][/size][size={defaultattr}][font={defaultattr}]
Writings

Selected Works[/font][/size]

Ernst Junger's famous four Figures were the Front soldier, the Worker, the Rebel and lastly the Anarch.  This was how the Wandervogel movement of early last century went forward through Junger's long life.  These Figures would correspond with:  1)  the SA and SS, 2)  the Wehrmacht soldier, 3)  the post-war actual German Opposition who denied the legitimacy of the Federal Republic yet did not flee to Spain, South America and points beyond (as most of the German Opposition did after the defeat of '45) and finally 4)  the Catholic Nationalist with an emphasis on the holy solitude of Catholics in the anti-Catholic Babylon of the triumphant Allied Powers.  One should recognise that Junger was anything but a follower of Bakunin and the various Anarchist Internationals.
  
No doubt the main reason Julius Evola would bash Junger was simply that few writers would typify the Anarch as completely as Julius Evola himself.did.  Evola was a very bad lapsed Catholic and also a very bad literary critic of the other great Pan-European/Roman writers of his own time.  Extreme self-centeredness does such things to a man.  Meanwhile, back in the real world here on planet earth, all of the great writes in the decades after World War Two were in the same overall situation as the great Ancient Roman writers had been after the end of the Great Roman cινιℓ ωαrs.  In the Roman Empire the great writers divided into the factions of Cicero and Virgil, what we would describe as Republicans and Nationalists.  Similarly, the differences between the Republican-style or Ciceronean writers such as Junger, Rene Char, T. S. Eliot, Jorge Luis Borges and Yves Bonnefoy on the one hand and the Nationalist or Virgilian writers such as Evola, Heidegger, Ezra Pound, W. B. Yeats, Paul Valery and the greatest South American writers, namely the Argentine Carlos Alberto Disandro and last but not least, the epitome of Magic Realism, the actual literary equivalent to Virgil in the Third Millennium, the incomparable Chilean writer Don Miguel Serrano.

The above paragraph is the historic objective truth about contemporary literature in a conveniently compressed nutshell.  Truth always being, needless to say, the ultimate political incorrectness.  What this can show us about the Conciliar Church is that, in actual historical terms, the Conciliarists are nothing but the most craven cowards who deserve nothing but Roman Catholic contempt.  They are mere Leftist rabble rousers who always, as history demonstrates, get what they richly deserve sooner or later.  No doubt sooner, given the existing general chaos that is a Counter-Revolutionary situation if ever there has been such a time:  the Weimar Republic on steroids, so to speak.
Title: Re: Eleison Comments - Official Church? (No. 551)
Post by: Franciscan Solitary on February 10, 2018, 01:38:36 PM
Hmm...."Marian Militia".....I like that....

Well, Mr. Johnson, even the hapless Fr. Pfeiffer can stumble over a good idea once in a great while.  We should have our wits about us enough to know that St. Maximilian Kolbe is the premier spiritual guide of Roman Catholics going forward into the future.  That shouldn't be advanced rocket science for us.

Elementary, my dear Johnson...