.At the flagship parish church of the Society of St Pius X in Paris, France,...
That would be St. Nicolas du Chardonnet!
.Fr Gabriel Billecocq wrote in last month’s issue (#333) of the parish’s monthly magazine Le Chardonnet an article entitled “Did you say ‘official Church’?” In it he never once mentions Society Headquarters in Menzingen, Switzerland, but he does complain of the “wish” coming from somewhere, presumably on high, that the words “Conciliar Church” should always be replaced by the words “official Church.” And he is right, because the words “Conciliar Church” are perfectly clear, whereas the words “official Church” are not clear, but ambiguous.
It's nice to get a "heads-up" like this. Watch out for "official Church" being kicked around in the near future. RE: EC DLI.
Looks like Newrome is demanding that the term "official Church" become implemented from "on high" in the XSPX.
E.g., part of the secret negotiations
that have been going on behind closed doors, and fairly denied by some.
I.e., the "deal" or the "practical agreement" has already been achieved, a fait accompli,
as they say in Paris.
.As for the speculation, we hear that two main candidates are being groomed by Menzingen for voters at the Society’s July elections to choose as Superior General, because the post will no longer be taken by a bishop. At a guess, Rome is already in virtual control of these major decisions being taken within Society Headquarters. In that case Rome has little to fear of either of these two candidates substantially changing Bishop Fellay’s pro-Roman policies, while it may have much to gain from the appearance of a change at the top, and it may be able to make use of Bishop Fellay in Rome to be head of a “renovated” Ecclesia Dei Congregation, to include all Traditional communities, including his own former Society.
And here +W expects +Fellay to step down in June, to be transferred over to a head a new body that will swallow up the Society -- Newrome must be pleased with the performance of +F and is offering him a "luscious plum" (his own words, from 1995), not to be confused with the fruit from the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil.
Returning to the ambiguous "official Church" theme...
.For on the one hand “Conciliar Church” signifies clearly that large part of today’s Church which is more or less poisoned with the errors of the Second Vatican Council. Those errors consist essentially in the re-centring upon man of the Church which should be centred on God.
This term, "Conciliar Church" was one coined by one of the Newchurch Modernists, and immediately recognized by Fr. Malachi Martin as the PROPER TERM to use when referring to the Modernists who have overtaken the Roman seat of the Church. It has been for the past 30 years a very specific and clear term which leaves nothing to the imagination. But Newchurch Modernists abhor clarity and definition. They much prefer wiggle room and therefore AMBIGUITY. One might say, duplicity is their norm..On the other hand “official Church” is an expression with two possible meanings. Either it can mean 1) the Church officially instituted by Christ and officially brought to us down the ages by the succession of Popes, and to that “official Church” no Catholic can object, on the contrary. Or 2) “official Church” can be taken to mean that mass [crowd] of the Church’s officials devoted to Vatican II who for the last half-century have been using their official power in Rome to inflict upon Catholics the Conciliar errors, and to this “official Church” no Catholic can not object. ....the Church’s officials devoted to Vatican II who for the last half-century have been using their official power in Rome to inflict upon Catholics the Conciliar errors...
Some words can stand alone -- this should be a very useful direct quote.
.Therefore “Conciliar Church” expresses something automatically bad, while “official Church” expresses something good or bad, depending upon which of its two meanings it is being given. Therefore to replace “Conciliar Church” by “official church” is to replace clarity by confusion, and it also stops Catholics from referring to the evil of Vatican II.
So it has a DOUBLE PURPOSE - it replaces clarity with confusion, and it stops Catholics from referring to the evil of Vat.II -- notice what +W has not pronounced here, that this DOUBLE PURPOSE has been nothing other than the +Fellayite agenda ever since 1994 when he was first elected, but something that he has implemented in stages of development over the past 24 long years; the stages of which have been chronicled here on CI but to which stages the blind followers of the XSPX are oblivious. How many blind followers of the XSPX do you know who have never heard of GREC
? Or the AFD (a.k.a. Doctrinal Declaration
of April 15th, 2012)? Oh, right, they've heard of +W's expulsion but he deserved
it, don't ya' know - he was a disobedient anti-Semite.
Notice, if you will, that this DOUBLE PURPOSE shares a lot ideologically with the hermeneutic of continuity of Benedict XVI.
There are a lot of things an E.C. contains that a reader unfamiliar with recent history would not understand.