Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: ELEISON COMMENTS NUMBER 528 " WHY RESISTANCE"? Aug 26,AD 2017  (Read 663 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Miseremini

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3750
  • Reputation: +2794/-238
  • Gender: Female
ELEISON COMMENTS NUMBER 528 " WHY RESISTANCE"? Aug 26,AD 2017
« on: August 26, 2017, 12:16:07 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0

  • Number DXXVIII (528)
    August 26, 2017
    Why “Resistance”?
    When Tradcats’ leaders prove to be untrue,
    Then Tradcats need to be “Resistants” too.

    Following on “Why Tradition?,” let Fr Patrick Girouard, presently ministering to a “Resistance” parish in Western Canada, explain the need not only for Catholics to be Traditional, but also for Traditional Catholics to “Resist.” The following “Mission Statement” he wrote in June of 2013, precisely to explain why he and a few dozen SSPX parishioners were getting out from under the SSPX. Alas, the “Statement” has had to be cruelly shortened. For the full text, contact Fr Girouard at thebastion.faith.
    If I, Father Girouard, and about a third of the Langley parish, have decided to start a new parish, it was because our beloved Society is being destroyed by its management, and we could no longer stand the constant propaganda favouring that destruction. Having studied carefully the docuмents that shed light on it, we were able to understand what happened. If we then remained silent and inactive, not only would we be putting ourselves in harm’s way, but we would also be contributing to the destruction of the Traditional movement. May our taking action encourage more priests and faithful to do likewise!
    For all practical purposes, the Society of St. Pius X has joined the Conciliar Church. Even if the deal with Rome has not yet been signed, nevertheless it was accepted in principle at the Society’s July 2012 General Chapter, which was the Revolution inside the Society: the Chapter took the decision that from now on the Society can sign a pact with the relentless destroyers of the Catholic Church.
    But how can any Catholic worthy of the name go along with such a decision? How can we say that we are Catholic, if we accept to make a deal with those who are facilitating, by their actions or their silence, the damnation of countless souls for which Our Lord gave His life? How can we even sit down to talk with people who promote that abomination to God, the Novus Ordo Missae? I can remember Archbishop Lefebvre quoting the Prophet Malachy against the New Mass: “To you O priests, that despise my name, and have said: ‘Wherein have we despised thy name?’ You offer polluted bread upon my altar, and you say: ‘Wherein have we polluted thee?’ saith the Lord of hosts” (I, 7).
    The mission of the SSPX has never been to enter into the structure of the Conciliar Church so as to “transform” it from within. Such an illusion was condemned by Archbishop Lefebvre after the 1988 Consecrations. The Society’s mission is to train priests who will preach the Truth and fight vigorously against error, without “talks” or “dialogue,” or “negotiations.” Like a beacon, that little remnant will then attract souls of good will. But the present Society leaders have betrayed that mission, nor do they tolerate dissent or critics, so the only way for us to hold to the Truth is to separate ourselves from the Neo-society. We must pray hard for a solution to the crisis, and for ourselves to persevere.
    You may ask me: when will be the time to join Rome? How will we ever know if we have a good Pope? The answer is simple: when the Pope publicly condemns the New Mass and forbids its celebration under pain of excommunication; when he publicly condemns and rejects the whole of the Second Vatican Council; in brief, when we see him taking effective action to clean up the mess. Similarly, when can we go back and trust the SSPX again? Answer: When Bishop Fellay and all the priests of the Society promoting the new line will be dismissed, and barred from any future office; when the texts of the Chapter will be officially repudiated; when the faithful priests will be vindicated, and so on.
    Impossible, you say? I reply quite simply: So what? What’s the problem? We just do our duty, give glory to God, and leave Him to deal with the destroyers. Let us pray and sacrifice for their conversion, and remain united in prayer, for sure. But let us compromise and put ourselves in harm’s way? – Never!
    Kyrie eleison.
    "Let God arise, and let His enemies be scattered: and them that hate Him flee from before His Holy Face"  Psalm 67:2[/b]



    Offline Incredulous

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8901
    • Reputation: +8675/-849
    • Gender: Male
    Re: ELEISON COMMENTS NUMBER 528 " WHY RESISTANCE"? Aug 26,AD 2017
    « Reply #1 on: August 29, 2017, 10:10:36 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0

  • Why not more Resistance Leadership?

    The thought came to mind that wouldn't a good pastor of the Resistance flock, recruit and look out for the independent Chapel's welfare ?

    See that they had a secure place and a succession of priests and regular Sacraments ?

    Is this happening?     Or are is the remnant left to randomness and self-sufficiency?

    If it is not the latter, you could have fooled me? 

    "Some preachers will keep silence about the truth, and others will trample it underfoot and deny it. Sanctity of life will be held in derision even by those who outwardly profess it, for in those days Our Lord Jesus Christ will send them not a true Pastor but a destroyer."  St. Francis of Assisi


    Offline JPaul

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3832
    • Reputation: +3722/-293
    • Gender: Male
    Re: ELEISON COMMENTS NUMBER 528 " WHY RESISTANCE"? Aug 26,AD 2017
    « Reply #2 on: August 29, 2017, 11:06:13 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote
    The answer is simple: when the Pope publicly condemns the New Mass and forbids its celebration under pain of excommunication; when he publicly condemns and rejects the whole of the Second Vatican Council;
    An admirable and proper requirement. However only insofar as the the "resistance" Bishops, priests, and followers do adopt this principle and stand unequivocally behind it, can they claim to be a legitimate resistance movement.

    Dancing around, qualifying, and granting exceptions to the issue are unacceptable to men who are serious about upholding the Faith and helping the Church and Her children.


    Offline josefamenendez

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4421
    • Reputation: +2946/-199
    • Gender: Female
    Re: ELEISON COMMENTS NUMBER 528 " WHY RESISTANCE"? Aug 26,AD 2017
    « Reply #3 on: August 29, 2017, 08:42:12 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Why not more Resistance Leadership?

    The thought came to mind that wouldn't a good pastor of the Resistance flock, recruit and look out for the independent Chapel's welfare ?

    See that they had a secure place and a succession of priests and regular Sacraments ?

    Is this happening?     Or are is the remnant left to randomness and self-sufficiency?

    If it is not the latter, you could have fooled me?
    I agree, at least for my needs, selfish as it sounds. I know a more formal structure also makes the "Resistance" a much more notable target, but this diffuse, disconnection of resistance prelates and members is extraordinarily isolating. Not all of us are such great saints that we can survive without some sort of camaraderie and cohesiveness. I tell myself that this is the sacrifice that must be made for this time, and I guess that's true. But I would be a liar to say that the lack of structure and contact doesn't disturb me- it does. Very much.