Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Eleison Comments -- h0Ɩ0cαųstianity (No. 603)  (Read 2748 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Pax Vobis

  • Supporter
Re: Eleison Comments -- h0Ɩ0cαųstianity (No. 603)
« Reply #10 on: February 02, 2019, 09:50:12 PM »
Quote
They only lost a few Resisters, and even many with their eyes open have to come back, hat in hand, because they need the Mass and/or private schools and there aren't enough Resistance affiliated chapels. But most of the SSPX faithful still believes and hopes in the SSPX.
Excellent point.  As much as I detest the wimpy/hypocritical +Fellay and the rest of the neo-sspx’s govt, the priests as a whole are still doing much good for the world and thousands of families.  I wonder if Our Lady didn’t intervene (using +W’s interview) as a “No, not yet” to Benedict’s/Fellay’s deal, which would’ve been the loss of many souls.  

How many thousands of children will get a catholic education because the neo-sspx is still independent?  How might this next generation of young Catholics be pivotal in the future, who will surely see and live through the chastisement?  Might their reaction to God's all-Holy and all-just wrath on the world be one of humility and recognition of the world’s sins... a reaction similar Deuteronomy 29, where Moses tells the Israelites what will happen if they break God's laws?



22And the following generation shall say, and the children that shall be born hereafter, and the strangers that shall come from afar, seeing the plagues of that land and the evils wherewith the Lord hath afflicted it,  23Burning it with brimstone, and the heat of salt, so that it cannot be sown any more, nor any green thing grow therein, after the example of the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrha, Adama and Seboim, which the Lord destroyed in his wrath and indignation:  24And all the nations shall say: Why hath the Lord done thus to this land? what meaneth this exceeding great heat of his wrath?  25And they shall answer: Because they forsook the covenant of the Lord, which he made with their fathers, when he brought them out of the land of Egypt:  26And they have served strange gods, and adored them, whom they knew not, and for whom they had not been assigned: 27Therefore the wrath of the Lord was kindled against this land, to bring upon it all the curses that are written in this volume :  28And he hath cast them out of their land, in anger and in wrath, and in very great indignation, and hath thrown them into a strange land, as it is seen this day.
29Secret things to the Lord our God: things that are manifest, to us and to our children for ever, that we may do all the words of this law.


Re: Eleison Comments -- h0Ɩ0cαųstianity (No. 603)
« Reply #11 on: February 03, 2019, 12:17:53 AM »
I was under the false impression that Michael A Hoffman coined the term "h0Ɩ0cαųstianity" ?

Here's a quick guide to the religion: h0Ɩ0cαųstianity (Metapedia)


h0Ɩ0cαųstianity

[th]The h0Ɩ0cαųst [/th]
h0Ɩ0cαųstianity
[th]Timelines and alleged origins [/th]
[th]Alleged methods [/th]
[th]Alleged important evidence [/th]
[th]h0Ɩ0cαųst revisionist websites [/th]
[th]Anti-h0Ɩ0cαųst revisionism [/th]
h0Ɩ0cαųstianity refers to various argued similarities between beliefs in the politically correct version of the h0Ɩ0cαųst and religious beliefs. Note that the term is used by critics and none of the argued similarities are by the critics argued to in fact be religiously correct.
Contents
Argued similarities
Such argued similarities include:
  • the Devil - Hitler
  • Devil worshipers - neo-nαzιs, fascists, racists, skinheads, eugenicists, and so on
  • cursed people - Germans and Whites generally
  • blasphemy/heresy - h0Ɩ0cαųst denial
  • blasphemy/heresy laws - h0Ɩ0cαųst denial laws
  • pilgrimages to holy places - mass travels to h0Ɩ0cαųst cσncєnтrαтισn cαмρs and other places connected with the h0Ɩ0cαųst
  • places of worship elsewhere - numerous museums, Yad Vashem, and so on. See also List of h0Ɩ0cαųst memorials and museums.
  • holy days - h0Ɩ0cαųst Memorial Days
  • holy scriptures - the Posen speeches, the Wannsee Protocol, the Hossbach Memorandum‎, Anne Frank's diary, and so on
  • relics - h0Ɩ0cαųst memorabilia displayed in the argued places of worship and traded on, for example, Ebay
  • icons - h0Ɩ0cαųst photographs, holograms of h0Ɩ0cαųst survivors, and so on
  • morality plays - h0Ɩ0cαųst movies and television series
  • martyrs - h0Ɩ0cαųst victims
  • saints - h0Ɩ0cαųst survivors
  • apostles - notable h0Ɩ0cαųst witnesses
  • holy warriors - nαzι hunters, anti-racists, social justice warriors, and so on
  • Golgotha - Auschwitz
  • the cross - the gas chamber
  • resurrection - creation of Israel
  • offerings, penances, and indulgences - payments and privileges to various groups and Israel
  • prophets - alarmists alarming of a new h0Ɩ0cαųst if not obeyed, such as when lobbying for starting wars on various perceived enemies of Israel
  • religious profanity - Godwin's Law
Criticisms of argued h0Ɩ0cαųstianity are independent of h0Ɩ0cαųst revisionist criticisms.
Various commercial and pecuniary aspects of argued h0Ɩ0cαųstianity have been argued to be one part of the h0Ɩ0cαųst industry.
h0Ɩ0cαųst uniqueness views may be related to h0Ɩ0cαųstianity views.
The h0Ɩ0cαųst may be openly religiously interpreted, such as by some Christian Zionists and some religious Jews.
See h0Ɩ0cαųst demographics regarding an argued religious/prophetic significance of six million Jews being killed and an argued exploitation of this number by Zionists.
Quotes
Quote
The h0Ɩ0cαųst is something different. It is a singular event. It is not simply one example of genocide but a nearly successful attempt on the life of God's chosen children and, thus, on God himself.
Abraham Foxman, leader of the ADL of B'nai B'rith.[1]
Quote
In the beginning was the h0Ɩ0cαųst. We must therefore begin again. We must create a new тαℓмυd and compile new midrashim, just as we did after the Ḥurban, the destruction of the Second Temple. We did so then in order to mark the new beginning: until then we lived one way; from then on nothing could be the same.
Elie Wiesel.[2]
Quote
Pope Benedict should affirmatively declare h0Ɩ0cαųst denial to be heresy.
—Menachem Z. Rosensaft, International Network of Children of Jєωιѕн Survivors.[3]
Quote
As I observe young people in relativistic societies seeking an absolute for morals and values, they now can view the h0Ɩ0cαųst as the transcendental move away from the relativistic, and up into the absolute where the h0Ɩ0cαųst confronts absolute Evil and thus find fundamental values.
—Michael Berenbaum, former director of the U.S. h0Ɩ0cαųst Memorial Museum in Washington.[4]
Quote
Occasional experiments that I have conducted in my seminars convince me that ‘Auschwitz’ is ethnologically speaking one of the few taboo topics that our ‘taboo free society’ still preserves. While they did not react at all to other stimulants, ‘enlightened’ central European students who refused to accept any taboos at all, would react to a confrontation with ‘revisionist’ [denial] texts’ about the gas chambers at Auschwitz in just as ‘elementary’ a way (including the comparable physiological symptoms) as members of primitive Polynesian tribes would react to an infringement of one of their taboos. The students were literally beside themselves and were neither prepared nor capable of soberly discussing the presented theses. For the sociologist this is a very important point because a society’s taboos reveal what it holds sacred.
—Sociology professor Dr. Robert Hepp.[4]
Quote
The Six Million constitute a lay religion with its own dogma, commandments, decrees, prophets, high priests and Saints: St Anne (Frank), St Simon (Wiesenthal), St Elie (Wiesel). It has its holy places, its rituals and its pilgrimages. It has its temples and its relics (bars of soap, piles of shoes, etc.), its martyrs, heroes, miracles and miraculous survivors (millions of them), its golden legend and its righteous people. Auschwitz is its Golgotha, Hitler is its Satan. It dictates its law to the nations. Its heart beats in Jerusalem, at the Yad Veshem monument. It is a new religion that has enjoyed a meteoric growth since World War II. It has conquered the West and is setting out to conquer the world. Whereas the progress of scientific thinking in our consumer society has weakened the grip of all the classic religions by making people more and more sceptical as to the truth of religion’s stories and the promises religion holds out, the new religion prospers to the point that anybody caught denying its basic dogma is branded as a “Revisionist”, is cast out of the community, and is treated like only heretics used to be treated. It is in effect a religion, and it is today a major instrument, and, one might say, the popular religion of the godless nєω ωσrℓ∂ σr∂єr.
—Bishop Richard N. Williamson.[5]


Re: Eleison Comments -- h0Ɩ0cαųstianity (No. 603)
« Reply #12 on: February 03, 2019, 01:43:54 PM »
I was under the false impression that Michael A Hoffman coined the term "h0Ɩ0cαųstianity" ?


As far as I know Hoffman was the one who actually coined the term even though h0Ɩ0cαųstianity existed long before he started using the term.   See for example: https://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Michael_A._Hoffman_II .
The linked article allows for the possibility that Hoffman did coin the term.

BTW, thanks for your post.  It is a great source of information to help drive home the ugly and evil reality of h0Ɩ0cαųstianity

Re: Eleison Comments -- h0Ɩ0cαųstianity (No. 603)
« Reply #13 on: February 03, 2019, 07:58:35 PM »
Whew!  You could'a fooled me.  If +W was not bashing the Jews in this EC,  then I for one can't for sure know what he was doing.  He wasn't exactly praising the Jews, and he certainly was not sparing their new h0Ɩ0cαųstian religion.  But who am I to argue with a CI member who knows exactly why some of us are here, and that, in fact, we are "not actually Catholic?"  One can't say much in the face of such inward, intuitive enlightenment.  Nevertheless, I'm happy that Cera thought +W's EC to be "spot on."
Why you little cut-and-paster. You know very well that the part of your post to which I was responding (which you cut out) was when you said:
Quote from: rum on Yesterday at 05:33:56 AM
I don't see any need to talk about anything on these forums but Catholicism and Jews.

So you see, Bishop Williamson can be spot on and you can be WAY off base by saying Catholics need not concern themselves about anything other than your favorite topic. Catholics are concerned about the Holy Trinity, the Holy Family, the angels and saints, the Holy Mass, all of the sacraments, sacramentals, the Holy Bible, other Catholic reading, Catholic music, Catholic films, Catholic art, etc.

Offline rum

Re: Eleison Comments -- h0Ɩ0cαųstianity (No. 603)
« Reply #14 on: February 04, 2019, 12:54:36 AM »
Cera has poor reading comprehension here. I clearly said Catholicism is one of the two things people should post about, and when posting about secular issues the criticisms should ideally be connected to Jєωιѕн influence. Talking about feminism or the wars in the middle east or homos on TV and not mentioning Jews in the same breath could count as lying by omission.