Author Topic: Eleison Comments - Historical Truth I (No. 531) (Read 2253 times)

Matthew · « **on:** September 17, 2017, 09:52:29 PM »

Number DXXXI (531)

September 16, 2017

Historical Truth – I
Truth must be loved, but then pursued by reason,
And then defended, in and out of season.
Scripture says (II Thess. II, 9–10) that the coming of the Antichrist “is according to the work of Satan [ . . . ] and in all seduction of iniquity to them that perish; because they receive not the love of truth, that they might be saved. Therefore God shall send them the operation of error, to believe lying: that they may be judged who have not believed the truth, but have consented to iniquity.” Each word needs to be weighed.
Towards the end of the world, which one can safely say must include the 21^st century, the wicked Antichrist will deceive souls that are headed for Hell, and they are headed for Hell because they do not accept the love of truth as they would accept it if they were headed for Heaven. Because they have not loved the truth, God will punish them with the operation of error, with the result that they will believe in a pack of lies. In this way all those will bring judgement upon themselves who instead of loving, seeking, finding and believing the truth, have consented to take part in the wicked world of lies fabricated by the Antichrist and his agents (who can be called “antichrists” with a small “a”). They will populate Hell.
Notice how the widespread damnation of the last times begins not with the refusal of truth but with the refusal of the love of truth. In the world of lies fabricated by today’s politicians and media, an “operation of error” if ever there was one, it may feel as though there is no truth to refuse, but if I refuse to despair and if with an upright heart I set up a hunt for that truth which I know is not around me, God will make sure that I find it (Mt. VII, 7–8). On the other hand if I know an important truth and disregard it, God will not be with me. Here is an example that could come from anywhere today in the Western world.
Just recently a French lawyer died, Bernard Jouanneau, who for years served LICRA to prosecute in the French courts Professor Robert Faurisson for denying the historical truth of the World War II gas-chambers in which Six Million Jєωs are widely held to have died (LICRA is the League against Racism and Anti-Semitism which prosecuted Archbishop Lefebvre for daring in the late 1980’s to suggest that Muslims should return to their own countries). In an interview with the French Catholic journal “La Croix” of 23 September, 1987, Jouanneau said, “If the gas-chambers existed, then the barbarity of the nαzιs was unequalled. If they did not exist, then the Jєωs have lied and anti-semitism would be justified. That is what is at stake in the gas-chambers debate.”
Jouanneau’s assessment is entirely correct, except that even more than just politics is at stake, because “h0Ɩ0cαųstianity” is the closest thing to a religion that many souls have today. Auschwitz replaces Calvary, the gas-chambers serve as Cross, and the Six Million Jєωs take the place of the Redeemer, in other words, are God. And this “h0Ɩ0cαųstianity” is the closest thing to a State religion of many a modern Western State. Therefore one would expect modern States and individuals alike to be seriously interested in the truth of the gas-chambers which are at the heart of “h0Ɩ0cαųstianity.” But what does one find? A large number of these States have passed laws to forbid questioning of the official version of the gas-chambers. But since when do laws make or unmake truth? Such laws bring the law itself into discredit!
Here is a tremendous lack of love of truth and a corresponding lack of truth. And sure enough, it is an “operation of error” which closes in, thanks to the vile media. Yet anybody who loves truth need spend only a few hours on the Internet for even the most emotional faith in the gas-chambers to be shaken. No wonder the Licrans and their like are doing all they can to censor the Internet, but with all its perils it remain s an asset to be vigorously defended, at least until and if the Licrans manage to control it.
Kyrie eleison.

Miseremini · « **Reply #1 on:** September 17, 2017, 09:57:30 PM »

One of His Excellency's best comments :applause: :applause:

RomanCatholic1953 · « **Reply #2 on:** September 17, 2017, 10:02:23 PM »

The Best Bishop Williamson Quote:

September, 1987, Jouanneau said, “If the gas-chambers existed, then the barbarity of the nαzιs was unequalled. If they did not exist, then the Jєωs have lied and anti-semitism would be justified. That is what is at stake in the gas-chambers debate.”

St Ignatius · « **Reply #3 on:** September 17, 2017, 10:34:27 PM »

Quote from: RomanCatholic1953 on September 17, 2017, 10:02:23 PM

The Best Bishop Williamson Quote:

September, 1987, Jouanneau said, “If the gas-chambers existed, then the barbarity of the nαzιs was unequalled. If they did not exist, then the Jєωs have lied and anti-semitism would be justified. That is what is at stake in the gas-chambers debate.”

To all the Jєω-luv'n gentiles... read em and weep...

JPaul · « **Reply #4 on:** September 17, 2017, 10:58:17 PM »

Licrans=Jєωs

Very clever

klasG4e · « **Reply #5 on:** September 18, 2017, 12:58:47 PM »

Number DXXXI (531)

September 16, 2017

Historical Truth – I

Truth must be loved, but then pursued by reason,
And then defended, in and out of season.

Scripture says (II Thess. II, 9–10) that the coming of the Antichrist “is according to the work of Satan [ . . . ] and in all seduction of iniquity to them that perish; because they receive not the love of truth, that they might be saved. Therefore God shall send them the operation of error, to believe lying: that they may be judged who have not believed the truth, but have consented to iniquity.” Each word needs to be weighed.

Towards the end of the world, which one can safely say must include the 21^st century, the wicked Antichrist will deceive souls that are headed for Hell, and they are headed for Hell because they do not accept the love of truth as they would accept it if they were headed for Heaven. Because they have not loved the truth, God will punish them with the operation of error, with the result that they will believe in a pack of lies. In this way all those will bring judgement upon themselves who instead of loving, seeking, finding and believing the truth, have consented to take part in the wicked world of lies fabricated by the Antichrist and his agents (who can be called “antichrists” with a small “a”). They will populate Hell.

Notice how the widespread damnation of the last times begins not with the refusal of truth but with the refusal of the love of truth. In the world of lies fabricated by today’s politicians and media, an “operation of error” if ever there was one, it may feel as though there is no truth to refuse, but if I refuse to despair and if with an upright heart I set up a hunt for that truth which I know is not around me, God will make sure that I find it (Mt. VII, 7–8). On the other hand if I know an important truth and disregard it, God will not be with me. Here is an example that could come from anywhere today in the Western world.

Just recently a French lawyer died, Bernard Jouanneau, who for years served LICRA to prosecute in the French courts Professor Robert Faurisson for denying the historical truth of the World War II gas-chambers in which Six Million Jєωs are widely held to have died (LICRA is the League against Racism and Anti-Semitism which prosecuted Archbishop Lefebvre for daring in the late 1980’s to suggest that Muslims should return to their own countries). In an interview with the French Catholic journal “La Croix” of 23 September, 1987, Jouanneau said, “If the gas-chambers existed, then the barbarity of the nαzιs was unequalled. If they did not exist, then the Jєωs have lied and anti-semitism would be justified. That is what is at stake in the gas-chambers debate.”

Jouanneau’s assessment is entirely correct, except that even more than just politics is at stake, because “h0Ɩ0cαųstianity” is the closest thing to a religion that many souls have today. Auschwitz replaces Calvary, the gas-chambers serve as Cross, and the Six Million Jєωs take the place of the Redeemer, in other words, are God. And this “h0Ɩ0cαųstianity” is the closest thing to a State religion of many a modern Western State. Therefore one would expect modern States and individuals alike to be seriously interested in the truth of the gas-chambers which are at the heart of “h0Ɩ0cαųstianity.” But what does one find? A large number of these States have passed laws to forbid questioning of the official version of the gas-chambers. But since when do laws make or unmake truth? Such laws bring the law itself into discredit!

Here is a tremendous lack of love of truth and a corresponding lack of truth. And sure enough, it is an “operation of error” which closes in, thanks to the vile media. Yet anybody who loves truth need spend only a few hours on the Internet for even the most emotional faith in the gas-chambers to be shaken. No wonder the Licrans and their like are doing all they can to censor the Internet, but with all its perils it remain s an asset to be vigorously defended, at least until and if the Licrans manage to control it.

Kyrie eleison.
*********************************************************************************************************
MAGNIFICENT! ABSOLUTELY MAGNIFICENT!!! On the fingers of just 2 hands, perhaps on the fingers of only 1 hand, I count this as being one of the very best, as well as one of the most courageous, Eleison Comments His Lordship Bishop Richard Williamson has ever authored/asserted.

His Excellency has risen up and -- roaring like a lion and a true successor of the Apostles -- has publicly spit upon human respect. (cf. Acts: 5:29) It is that human respect that submits knowingly or unknowingly to the abominable lie of what status quo comfort/security seeking historians and so many other people refer to as the "Six Million Gas Chamber Jєωιѕн h0Ɩ0cαųst." It is also known as the "Six Million Gas Chamber Jєωιѕн h0Ɩ0h0αx" by honest revisionist historians and others who are properly educated and honest about historical truth.

Bishop Williamson so rightly and correctly states: "....'h0Ɩ0cαųstianity' is the closest thing to a religion that many souls have today. Auschwitz replaces Calvary, the gas-chambers serve as Cross, and the Six Million Jєωs take the place of the Redeemer, in other words, are God. And this 'h0Ɩ0cαųstianity' is the closest thing to a State religion of many a modern Western State." This is a very powerful and truthful assessment, but don't expect any mainstream media like the New York Times to quote His Excellency on that. They would never want the public to see that assertion. For them it is enough to brand and dismiss the bishop as an "αnтι-ѕємιтє h0Ɩ0cαųst denier." (Matt. 5:11)

h0Ɩ0cαųstianity is front and center of the New/Jєω anti-Christ World Order. It will be crushed at some point in time, but until it is we should never fear to take a proverbial axe to it just as the good bishop has done here. In doing so His Excellency follows in the footsteps of one no less than the great St. Boniface who St. Willibald tells us in his work The Life of St. Boniface took an axe to the great sacred oak tree of the pagan Germanic people -- and cut it down. Indeed, this cutting down of the tree marked the beginning of their Christianization. May that the cutting down of h0Ɩ0cαųstianity mark as well the beginning of something great for the glory of God!

hollingsworth · « **Reply #6 on:** September 18, 2017, 01:30:01 PM »

H.E. Bp. Willamson was probably not getting long very well with Bp. Fellay and the upper sspx hierarchy long before 2009. I think his La Reja experience pretty well proves that . But when H.E. gave the now infamous Swedish TV interview in November of 2008, his sspx career really hit the skids. His days were numbered. Bernie and the boys had by then pretty well caved in to organized h0Ɩ0cαųst Jєωry. They weren't going to take sitting down H.E.'s public rejection of the 'gas chamber' nonsense. After all, no Catholic pope, bishop or priest with any name recognition all, since the end of WWII almost 70 years earlier, had ever said the things which Williamson finally admitted and declared openly. His remarks then literally shook the whole western world, including the pope and major European leaders. Fellay & Co. not, not to mention most of the other traditional movement's lay and clerical leaders treated him as a leper.
Now, it appears, H.E. may be stepping back into the fray. I hope so. IMO, Jєωry is so deeply embedded in tradiional Catholicism that only a miracle, and maybe an outspoken bishop or two, can help turn the tide.

St Ignatius · « **Reply #7 on:** September 18, 2017, 02:30:28 PM »

Quote from: hollingsworth on September 18, 2017, 01:30:01 PM

His remarks then literally shook the whole western world, including the pope and major European leaders. Fellay & Co. not, not to mention most of the other traditional movement's lay and clerical leaders treated him as a leper.

And his name became known to a unknown number of households around the world. It awoke a new zeal to combat against these usurpers of power over the weak and gullible.

The most amazing thing to me is he still remains a free man. The devils haven't been able to destroy him when they've been able to destroy, fine and imprison many a man of lesser crimes.

I don't think Bp Fellay was stupid to these facts, I personally believe he freely chose to side with the enemy. Look how well and powerful +W stood alone, imagine had +F and his priests stood along side of +W... they would've been unstoppable, IMO. It would have been the perfect storm...
Lord have mercy on them!

klasG4e · « **Reply #8 on:** September 19, 2017, 07:52:36 PM »

At some point in time Bp. Fellay publicly stated that the views of Bp. Williamson concerning what is commonly referred to as the h0Ɩ0cαųst were not those of the position of the SSPX. That statement seemed to fly under the radar screen of most folks. Stop, however, for a second to examine exactly what was said here. Bp. Fellay expressly, or at the very least implicitly, indicated that the SSPX had a position on the h0Ɩ0cαųst.

Say what! Since when did the SSPX have a position on the h0Ɩ0cαųst? In the context of all that was going on when Bp. Fellay said this -- and to make matters worse -- was the obvious implication that the "position" of the SSPX was the official 6 million gas chamber one put forth by organized Jєωry! This statement by Bp. Fellay played right into the hands of that same organized Jєωry which so virulently pushes its fake religion of h0Ɩ0cαųstianity as a way of spearheading its anti-Christ New/Jєω World Order. No small matter!

hollingsworth · « **Reply #9 on:** September 19, 2017, 10:24:50 PM »

Quote

Klas: At some point in time Bp. Fellay publicly stated that the views of Bp. Williamson concerning what is commonly referred to as the h0Ɩ0cαųst were not those of the position of the SSPX. That statement seemed to fly under the radar screen of most folks. Stop, however, for a second to examine exactly what was said here. Bp. Fellay expressly, or at the very least implicitly, indicated that the SSPX had a position on the h0Ɩ0cαųst. (bold type added)

This is true. The official position of sspx towards the h0Ɩ0cαųst had never been published, to my knowledge anyway, prior to the Swedish TV interview debacle. Fellay was left scrambling in the wake of Williamson's embarrassing remarks. He had to do instant damage control; and, IMO, botched it all up pretty nicely.

Some of you may remember, as well, Michael Matt of the Catacombs chiming in. He was equally incensed at Williamson for agreeing with so-called 'revisionist' historians, and, thereby, staining the traditional cause by associating it with "h0Ɩ0cαųst denial." So he made broad his Catholic phylacteries, and penned a lengthy, albeit dull, piece, decrying H.E., trying his best to mend any torn fences between the trad establishment and their 'elder brothers in the faith.'

The article is kind of a hoot. If readers have time, they may wish to slog through the entire thing. I include two paragraphs of it below.
https://www.remnantnewspaper.com/Archives/2009-0131-mjm-h0Ɩ0cαųst_denial.htm

Matt:

The bottom line is this: When he authorized the annulment of the 1988 decree of excommunication against the bishops of the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX), Pope Benedict had no idea that Bishop Williamson, having gotten hold of some revisionist “science” regarding the h0Ɩ0cαųst, had made the now infamous statement for which he has not only been removed from his position as seminary rector but also faces criminal charges in Argentina, Germany and France.

But let us be clear about one thing: There is nothing—I repeat, nothing—traditionally Catholic about h0Ɩ0cαųst denial. To my knowledge, Bishop Williamson is the first and only traditional Catholic spokesman to give these conspiracy theorists a second thought. And, according to the German newsmagazine Der Spiegel, Bishop Williamson was ordered by Superior General Bishop Fellay to "correct this nonsense" as soon as he saw the now-infamous interview. "It should not have needed a papal demand to do so," Fellay said.

Exactly right! This "nonsense" cannot be attributed to either the Holy Father or tradition-minded Catholics—no matter how hard the media try to make it stick.

St Ignatius · « **Reply #10 on:** September 19, 2017, 11:18:09 PM »

Quote from: hollingsworth on September 19, 2017, 10:24:50 PM

This is true. The official position of sspx towards the h0Ɩ0cαųst had never been published, to my knowledge anyway, prior to the Swedish TV interview debacle. Fellay was left scrambling in the wake of Williamson's embarrassing remarks. He had to do instant damage control; and, IMO, botched it all up pretty nicely.

Some of you may remember, as well, Michael Matt of the Catacombs chiming in. He was equally incensed at Williamson for agreeing with so-called 'revisionist' historians, and, thereby, staining the traditional cause by associating it with "h0Ɩ0cαųst denial." So he made broad his Catholic phylacteries, and penned a lengthy, albeit dull, piece, decrying H.E., trying his best to mend any torn fences between the trad establishment and their 'elder brothers in the faith.'

The article is kind of a hoot. If readers have time, they may wish to slog through the entire thing. I include two paragraphs of it below.
https://www.remnantnewspaper.com/Archives/2009-0131-mjm-h0Ɩ0cαųst_denial.htm

Matt:

The bottom line is this: When he authorized the annulment of the 1988 decree of excommunication against the bishops of the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX), Pope Benedict had no idea that Bishop Williamson, having gotten hold of some revisionist “science” regarding the h0Ɩ0cαųst, had made the now infamous statement for which he has not only been removed from his position as seminary rector but also faces criminal charges in Argentina, Germany and France.

But let us be clear about one thing: There is nothing—I repeat, nothing—traditionally Catholic about h0Ɩ0cαųst denial. To my knowledge, Bishop Williamson is the first and only traditional Catholic spokesman to give these conspiracy theorists a second thought. And, according to the German newsmagazine Der Spiegel, Bishop Williamson was ordered by Superior General Bishop Fellay to "correct this nonsense" as soon as he saw the now-infamous interview. "It should not have needed a papal demand to do so," Fellay said.
Exactly right! This "nonsense" cannot be attributed to either the Holy Father or tradition-minded Catholics—no matter how hard the media try to make it stick.

Here's an excerpt of an article published in the Remnant written by Christopher Ferrara. I canceled my subscription after this.

Being I don't have a complete transcript, I had to copy this from an article by E. Michael Jones. It's worthwhile reading Mr Jones' full article, it may refresh one's memory of these relevant past events... unfortunately, there's no mention of the Krah-factor...

Link here

It is time, then, for traditionalists to repudiate the inadmissible opinions of Bishop Richard Williamson, with due respect for his dignity as a descendant of the Apostles. For the good of the Church we must make it clear that the Bishop’s opinions are not those of the worldwide “traditionalist movement” (if we must call it that). Above all, we must not allow the Society or the movement as a whole to be draped with the albatross of the Bishop’s opinion on how many Jєωs perished at the hands of the nαzιs.

klasG4e · « **Reply #11 on:** September 20, 2017, 10:43:04 AM »

Much thanks Holly and St. Ignatius for your input and links. I had discontinued my subscription to The Remnant before the Bp. Williamson h0Ɩ0cαųst blow-up so this was the first time I actually read The Remnant article. Also, I had not viewed Jones' article until today. I found Matt's article extremely depressing and at the same time extremely infuriating to read. It is really way over the top in seemingly countless ways. Matt should feel so ashamed of having penned it.

Christopher Ferrara, the water carrier for Matt was most disgraceful in the way he reported on the Bp. Williamson h0Ɩ0cαųst matter. Just an absolute disgrace! Both of them could have easily been mistaken as hired guns for organized тαℓмυdic Jєωry. They might as well have been. As an aside, I can remember how in an article in The Remnant Ferrara once ridiculed people who questioned the official U.S. government's version of 9-11. In doing that one could hardly be blamed for thinking he was on the CIA's payroll!

Neil Obstat · « **Reply #12 on:** September 26, 2017, 01:19:47 AM »

.
This is a good one to remember.
.

Miseremini · « **Reply #13 on:** September 26, 2017, 11:01:27 AM »

Waiting impatiently for the next installment.

St Ignatius · « **Reply #14 on:** September 26, 2017, 11:50:21 AM »

Quote from: Miseremini on September 26, 2017, 11:01:27 AM

Waiting impatiently for the next installment.

Guess the bishop thinks we need more time for his last letter to sink in...?

Author Topic: Eleison Comments - Historical Truth I (No. 531) (Read 2253 times)

Matthew

Eleison Comments - Historical Truth I (No. 531)

Miseremini

Re: Eleison Comments - Historical Truth I (No. 531)

RomanCatholic1953

Re: Eleison Comments - Historical Truth I (No. 531)

St Ignatius

Re: Eleison Comments - Historical Truth I (No. 531)

JPaul

Re: Eleison Comments - Historical Truth I (No. 531)

klasG4e

Re: Eleison Comments - Historical Truth I (No. 531)

hollingsworth

Re: Eleison Comments - Historical Truth I (No. 531)

St Ignatius

Re: Eleison Comments - Historical Truth I (No. 531)

klasG4e

Re: Eleison Comments - Historical Truth I (No. 531)

hollingsworth

Re: Eleison Comments - Historical Truth I (No. 531)

St Ignatius

Re: Eleison Comments - Historical Truth I (No. 531)

klasG4e

Re: Eleison Comments - Historical Truth I (No. 531)

Neil Obstat

Re: Eleison Comments - Historical Truth I (No. 531)

Miseremini

Re: Eleison Comments - Historical Truth I (No. 531)

St Ignatius

Re: Eleison Comments - Historical Truth I (No. 531)