Yes, the indecency attributed in the Poem where none is meant or intended is truly appalling. Ladislaus has a dirty mind, so a perfectly harmless and beautiful event is filtered through his vilely corrupted mental faculties, and this is what you get.
I consider this a compliment coming from you, hollingsworth.
I wasn't speaking of intentions. Perhaps Valtorta, in fabricating the accounts, didn't consider prolonged homoerotic petting and kissing of various Apostles by Jesus to be indecent, projecting her own feminine sensibilities on it. She may not have realized that this kind of behavior among men only happens between ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs, since women might more innocently engage in such behavior with one another.
You see, this kind of dogmatic adherence to Valtorta, and the vitriolic defense thereof, is one of the biggest alarm bells that something is awry. Here hollingsworth attacks me more acrimoniously than if I had denied an actual dogma.
I submit that if is you who have the dirty mind if you have no problem with the passages cited.
Even Father Pacwa, of EWTN, not know as a Puritan with a dirty mind, excoriates Valtorta.
Topic: Eleison Comments - Hearts Protection (no. 597) (Read 6585 times)