.
...this version of the Secret may be incomplete, lacking mention of the Apocalypse and of recommended action. One may also object that the second half of the 20th century has come and gone with no World War...
...and that it 'lacks mention' of an
evil council that would
open the door to the
de facto replacement of the Canonized
Traditional Latin Mass worldwide, with a bastard imposter
which even faithful sons of the Apostles will mistakenly believe
was
"promulgated" even if 'illegitimately' so.
When the
real Third Secret is let out of its cage, there will
be practically NO ONE alive to whom the words will come as
entirely what they had expected them to be,
thus fulfilling
her prophesy that the "living will envy the dead." This ENTIRELY explains why the Modernists -- whose reality is
'all about
them,' subjectivism run rampant -- have been
unable to bring themselves to recognize that Our Lady could
ever have said such things,
ERGO (for to them, reality is in
the mind, and consequently, truth emerges from how they FEEL
about things!) these various words Sr. Lucia reported as being
of Our Lady were in 'REALITY' merely her imaginations. (Cf. Fr.
Edward Dhanis, S.J.) But beyond that, according to the
'hermeneutic of continuity' (a wholesale artificial contrivance of
erstwhile Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger, alias
B16 the unclean),
while we must accept that SOME of the public 'events' of Fatima
did in fact take place (so as to not openly contradict history!),
we can nonetheless reject SOME things in some way, but
ESPECIALLY the Third Secret, whose contents are ENTIRELY
'unacceptable' due to the fact that 'IT' makes us 'FEEL'
ill at ease, and the 'NEGATIVITY' of all that is simply too much to bear,
consequently, these purloined paraphrases
must at all
costs be shunned, spurned, scorned and derided! If St. Catherine of Sienna was horrified at the sight of the PLACE
that was prepared for her in Hell if she were to die in mortal sin,
just imagine the PLACES prepared for any of the conciliar popes!
Woe to the man who spurns the words of Our Lady!The Blessed Virgin Mary is the
"Queen of prophets," you know.
That's why true Catholics will recognize the voice of Our Lady.
The Liberal anti-doctrine that spurns the infallible doctrine of
exclusive salvation has been
imbibed on the grand scale, and Our Lady's words shall not be made barren by Liberalism.
Our Lord's words can by extension be applied likewise to
His Mother: Heaven and earth shall pass away, but My
words, nor those of My Mother shall not pass away! Her
fecundity is eternal and those who would be saved
embrace Her words without any HINT of reservation or
minimalism. Remember, John XXIII didn't think it was "for Our pontificate,"
because he was getting ready for a 'Council' and he couldn't
imagine
that would be "the one" that could do such
damage.
Remember that he almost furtively asserted that Latin would be
retained, and Gregorian Chant would have "pride of place" and
-- don't forget about his 'under-the-table' admonition against
ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs being allowed into seminaries, a docuмent which
was all but
buried with Paul VI's Liberalism.
I don't see the fulfillment of much of this alleged essence of the 3rd Secret in the second half of the 20th Century. What is His Excellency trying to convey?
It seems to me that he's right on the cutting edge, but somehow
has been missing the SPIRITUAL gravity of The Secret.
Don't get me wrong, it's a bit difficult to ignore the temporal
realities of war and genocide (remember, though, the Armenian
Genocide was still fresh on the blood-stained soil the Turks
stained when Our Lady appeared in 1917, but she made no
mention of it! That speaks volumes in itself!), but it is the
spiritual aspect of Her Message that is what should really
demand our undivided attention! Just how does a bishop like
+W deliver this principle in a world that is deaf to the very
notion of spiritual messages?
As real as physical war is, the
spiritual war and
spiritual
chastisement that we have been under since 1960 is the
real danger to our salvation, for what does it profit a man to
gain the world in this life only to suffer the loss of his eternal
salvation in the next?