Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]

Author Topic: SSPX Leaves Tulsa / I want specifically Cathinfo opinion  (Read 7854 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Meg

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6173
  • Reputation: +3147/-2941
  • Gender: Female
Re: SSPX Leaves Tulsa / I want specifically Cathinfo opinion
« Reply #45 on: October 02, 2017, 01:49:26 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: TKGS on October 02, 2017, 01:15:13 PM
    So where's your problem?  

    Not sure anymore of population centers around there, but I assume you live in Seattle or Portland.  It's a drive, but there is Saint Mary's in Tacoma.  I'd much rather go there than to anything else you're looking at.

    Surely you know what the problem is.
    Logged
    "It is licit to resist a Sovereign Pontiff who is trying to destroy the Church. I say it is licit to resist him in not following his orders and in preventing the execution of his will. It is not licit to Judge him, to punish him, or to depose him, for these are acts proper to a superior."

    ~St. Robert Bellarmine
    De Romano Pontifice, Lib.II, c.29

    Offline TKGS

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5767
    • Reputation: +4620/-480
    • Gender: Male
    Re: SSPX Leaves Tulsa / I want specifically Cathinfo opinion
    « Reply #46 on: October 02, 2017, 01:54:59 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
    • Quote from: Meg on October 02, 2017, 01:49:26 PM
    Surely you know what the problem is.
    No.  Actually I don't know what your problem is unless it be that you refuse communion with Catholics.
    Logged

    Offline Meg

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6173
    • Reputation: +3147/-2941
    • Gender: Female
    Re: SSPX Leaves Tulsa / I want specifically Cathinfo opinion
    « Reply #47 on: October 02, 2017, 01:57:32 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: TKGS on October 02, 2017, 01:54:59 PM
    No.  Actually I don't know what your problem is unless it be that you refuse communion with Catholics.
    :jester:

    Just one of the many obvious reasons why I believe that most Sedes are nuts. 
    Logged
    "It is licit to resist a Sovereign Pontiff who is trying to destroy the Church. I say it is licit to resist him in not following his orders and in preventing the execution of his will. It is not licit to Judge him, to punish him, or to depose him, for these are acts proper to a superior."

    ~St. Robert Bellarmine
    De Romano Pontifice, Lib.II, c.29

    Offline TKGS

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5767
    • Reputation: +4620/-480
    • Gender: Male
    Re: SSPX Leaves Tulsa / I want specifically Cathinfo opinion
    « Reply #48 on: October 02, 2017, 01:58:48 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
    • Quote from: Meg on October 02, 2017, 01:57:32 PM
    :jester:

    Just one of the many obvious reasons why I believe that most Sedes are nuts.
    You truly prove my point.
    Logged

    Offline Clemens Maria

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2246
    • Reputation: +1484/-605
    • Gender: Male
    Re: SSPX Leaves Tulsa / I want specifically Cathinfo opinion
    « Reply #49 on: October 02, 2017, 07:10:32 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: TKGS on October 02, 2017, 01:58:48 PM
    You truly prove my point.
    She's a nutmeg!
    Logged

    Offline Meg

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6173
    • Reputation: +3147/-2941
    • Gender: Female
    Re: SSPX Leaves Tulsa / I want specifically Cathinfo opinion
    « Reply #50 on: October 02, 2017, 07:17:58 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
    • Logged
    "It is licit to resist a Sovereign Pontiff who is trying to destroy the Church. I say it is licit to resist him in not following his orders and in preventing the execution of his will. It is not licit to Judge him, to punish him, or to depose him, for these are acts proper to a superior."

    ~St. Robert Bellarmine
    De Romano Pontifice, Lib.II, c.29

    Offline Clemens Maria

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2246
    • Reputation: +1484/-605
    • Gender: Male
    Re: SSPX Leaves Tulsa / I want specifically Cathinfo opinion
    « Reply #51 on: October 02, 2017, 08:29:31 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Call me crazy but I like nuts.
    Logged

    Offline SanMateo

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 109
    • Reputation: +64/-9
    • Gender: Male
    Re: SSPX Leaves Tulsa / I want specifically Cathinfo opinion
    « Reply #52 on: October 04, 2017, 11:48:54 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Stubborn on September 28, 2017, 12:29:09 PM
    Of course, it's been a long time since I remember hearing an SSPX sermon on the necessity of avoiding the NO / Indult or the necessity of adhering to our Sunday obligation.
    I thought you attended St. Joseph's in Michigan from what I remember . . . When I was at St. Margaret Mary in Grand Rapids, we heard about avoiding the NO/Indult on a nearly WEEKLY basis from Fr. Webber.  He constantly spoke out against the NO establishment.  Fr. Boyle, who was the prior at St. Joseph's (as I'm sure you are aware) sent out an email to all the young adults to discourage them from attending a Mass put on by Juventutem Michigan specifically because it was an Indult, and that we can't support that kind of things, but to feel free to meet up with the members after Mass.  I'm just surprised that it's been a long time since you've heard a sermon on that topic, when I attend the other two SSPX chapels in Michigan, and hear it very regularly. 
    Also, I'm not saying you are lying by any means.  It is just unfortunate that we get to hear it all the time, and you don't.  I have never once been over to St. Joseph's FYI.  In short, the Michigan SSPX priests have been nothing short of fantastic from what I've seen. 
    Logged

    Offline Stubborn

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 13817
    • Reputation: +5566/-865
    • Gender: Male
    Re: SSPX Leaves Tulsa / I want specifically Cathinfo opinion
    « Reply #53 on: October 04, 2017, 12:02:40 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Fr. Boyle and on occasion a visiting priest has made brief mentions of the NO once or twice from the pulpit, but no one has given a sermon on the evils of the NO or explicitly condemned it. Most often the sermons are pretty good, but very little has been said in regards to the NO at all. Put it this way, the last sermon I heard on the NO from an SSPX priest was when I was in Louisville, KY - from the pulpit, Fr. Horvath aggressively lambasted the whole NO for exactly what it is. That was probably more than 10 years ago.  
    Logged
    "But Peter and the apostles answering, said: We ought to obey God, rather than men." - Acts 5:29

    The Highest Principle in the Church: "We are first of all under obedience to God, and only then under obedience to man" - Fr. Hesse

    Offline Clemens68

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 7
    • Reputation: +1/-1
    • Gender: Male
    Re: SSPX Leaves Tulsa / I want specifically Cathinfo opinion
    « Reply #54 on: October 04, 2017, 07:48:31 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • You know how it works. Follow the money 'til the moneys gone.
    Logged
    Pages: 1 2 3 [4]
    « previous next »