Author Topic: Eleison Comments CDXXXVI (436) Nov. 22, 2015 A.D. (Read 21565 times)

Matthew · « **Reply #70 on:** November 23, 2015, 10:00:49 AM »

Quote from: Ladislaus

Quote from: covet truth
I have no fear that +Williamson will in any way endorse or take a position that favors the N.O.

And where have you been? He's already condoned attending the NOM.

Oh please. That whole comment was blown WAY out of proportion. It gets better ever time it's told. By now, there should be rumors he's saying the NOM itself.

He made a bad judgment call giving a lady private advice in a public forum, and he was CRUCIFIED for it. I think the reaction was way overblown. No rule has changed, and +W is still a huge proponent of the Resistance and rejecting the Novus Ordo -- at least for those who understand. But what about those (objective) fools who don't understand? But I'm not going to get into that discussion again.

But like I said: "sedevacantists". They'll take anything they can get to go on another attack. It's what they do.

I hope I'm not referring to any members here. But to anyone who enjoyed the various CRAP coming out of certain sede quarters regarding +Williamson a few months ago -- well, there's not much I can say.

Ladislaus · « **Reply #71 on:** November 23, 2015, 10:12:54 AM »

Quote from: Matthew

Quote from: Ladislaus
Quote from: covet truth
I have no fear that +Williamson will in any way endorse or take a position that favors the N.O.

And where have you been? He's already condoned attending the NOM.

Oh please. That whole comment was blown WAY out of proportion.

I wrote that he "condoned" it. I never said that he endorsed it, promoted it, or offered it. But, speaking of "facts", Matthew, it's a straightforward fact that +Williamson condoned attendance at the New Mass.

covet truth · « **Reply #72 on:** November 23, 2015, 10:30:54 AM »

Quote from: Ladislaus

Evidently your logical faculties fail you. YOU are the one who's claiming that these purported miracles mean something. I am saying that they mean nothing. My point was that my own speculation is every bit as plausible as yours. Go take a course in Logic 101 and then rejoin this thread.

I am saying that they mean nothing to YOU. You can't say they "mean nothing" to those involved and who witnessed it.

Ladislaus · « **Reply #73 on:** November 23, 2015, 10:39:20 AM »

Quote from: covet truth

Quote from: Ladislaus

Evidently your logical faculties fail you. YOU are the one who's claiming that these purported miracles mean something. I am saying that they mean nothing. My point was that my own speculation is every bit as plausible as yours. Go take a course in Logic 101 and then rejoin this thread.

I am saying that they mean nothing to YOU. You can't say they "mean nothing" to those involved and who witnessed it.

I am saying that they mean nothing objectively or from a theological standpoint. Subjective "meaning" has nothing to do with this.

2Vermont · « **Reply #74 on:** November 23, 2015, 10:43:53 AM »

Quote from: Ladislaus

Quote from: Matthew
Quote from: Ladislaus
Quote from: covet truth
I have no fear that +Williamson will in any way endorse or take a position that favors the N.O.

And where have you been? He's already condoned attending the NOM.

Oh please. That whole comment was blown WAY out of proportion.

I wrote that he "condoned" it. I never said that he endorsed it, promoted it, or offered it. But, speaking of "facts", Matthew, it's a straightforward fact that +Williamson condoned attendance at the New Mass.

And this "miracle" appears to validate such attendance.