“Anti-Semitism” Trickery
Is “antisemite” wielded like a sword?
Just ask the wielder to define the word.
There are treacherous words which seem to mean one thing and are used to mean quite another. One of the most treacherous words of all is “anti-semitism.” The word seems to mean opposition to all Jєωs purely and simply because they are Jєωs, and in this sense it rightly condemns something bad, because some Jєωs are wicked, but certainly not all. On the other hand it is often used to condemn absolutely any opposition to anything that any Jєωs do, and then the word is wrongly condemning something good, because whenever Jєωs do anything bad then opposition to them is good. But do Jєωs do things bad? Obviously. They created Islam for Arabs, Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ for Gentiles and Communism for the modern world, all three primarily to fight Jesus Christ and Christianity, and so send souls to Hell.
A book which all Catholics should read who wish to defend the Church against Islam, Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ and Communism, now Globalism, is The Plot Against the Church by Maurice Pinay. The book was written just before Vatican II to be put into the hands of all Council Fathers, to warn them of the great danger in which the Church would find herself at the Council. Sure enough. The Council Fathers ended up praising Islam (Unitatis Redintegratio), adopting Freemasonic principles (Dignitatis Humanae) and never mentioning, still less condemning, the evil system of Communism. Here is how in his Chapter on “Antisemitism and Christianity” Maurice Pinay analyses the treachery of the word “antisemitism”:?—
Down the ages the Jєωs have always used vague words with a variety of meanings, writes Pinay, to snare Gentile minds and so prevent them from defending themselves against the Jєωιѕн drive towards world domination in that 2,000-year war on Christianity which he carefully docuмents throughout his book. So in a first stage, by three arguments they seek to prevail upon Gentile leaders to condemn “antisemitism” in its first sense, given above, of opposition to everything and everybody Jєωιѕн: firstly, Christ, by establishing the equality of all men before God, condemned any such degrading of a whole race; secondly, Christ told all men to “love one another”; thirdly, Christ and his Mother were both Jєωιѕн.
But in a second stage the Jєωs, having once obtained the Gentiles’ condemnation of a vague “antisemitism,” then proceed to give the word a quite different meaning, the second sense above, of any and all opposition to anything whatsoever that Jєωs do. Thus “antisemites” become: all patriots exerting their right of self-defence against Jєωιѕн subversion of their country; all defenders of the family against the errors and vices of all sorts fomented by the Jєωs to dissolve it (e.g. abortion, pornography); all Catholics defending their holy religion against every form of corruption being openly or secretly promoted by the Jєωs to undermine it; all truth-tellers unmasking Jєωs as the originators of Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ and Communism (now of Globalism and feminism, etc.); and all people in general opposing Jєωιѕн subversion of the Church and of Christian civilisation. And by their control of politics, finance, films and above all by their media, the Jєωs have succeeded in giving such an electric charge to this one little word “αnтι-ѕємιтє,” that it is enough to electrocute anyone that it touches.
But who is foolish enough to have allowed them to control politics and finance? Who has allowed them to virtually monopolise the film industry and the media? Who thinks it is so smart to have done away with all censorship and is now co-operating with them to enable them to censor the Internet? Gentile liberals in every case, who are therefore being enslaved, by the minute, in their nєω ωσrℓ∂ σr∂єr. Doctor, cure thyself! For who that reads their newpapers or watches their television programmes has anybody to blame but himself fo r letting them take over his mind, and his civilisation?
Catholics, read The Plot against the Church. If anybody is accusing you of being an “antisemite,” it is quite possible you have reason to be proud.
Kyrie eleison.
Topic: Eleison Comments by H.E. Bishop Williamson Number CDLXVI (466) (Read 2202 times)