Read an Interview with Matthew, the owner of CathInfo

Author Topic: Eleison Comments - Brexit Diagnosed 1 (no. 616)  (Read 1062 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Matthew

  • Mod
  • *****
  • Posts: 22961
  • Reputation: +20089/-243
  • Gender: Male
Eleison Comments - Brexit Diagnosed 1 (no. 616)
« on: May 04, 2019, 08:16:19 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Number DCXVI (616)
    May 4, 2019
    Brexit Diagnosed – I
    People of once Great Britain, do beware –
    Without God, Mammon’s slaves will strip you bare!

    For months now the British Parliament, once virtual master of the world, has been presenting an unworthy spectacle of division and irresolution to the same world. Why has the question of leaving the European Union caused such confusion and upset? Surely because when in 2016 the political class gave to the people the opportunity to vote in a referendum on their New World Order politics, the people voted in heavier numbers than ever in Britain, and took the political class completely by surprise when they voted down its NWO by 52 to 48 per cent. The vote for Brexit (Britain’s exit from the EU) made that class lose its bearings and it has been floundering ever since, so completely and for so long has it been bewitched – or bought – by the NWO.
    Bought, because the European Union and its parliament in Brussels represent Mammon, or the politics of money. Because the whole idea behind the European Union was by material prosperity to buy the support of the very different European peoples for the submerging of their national differences into one international European State, which is in its turn to be a key component of the one international world-State, the New World Order. Thus the Judeo-Masonic money-masters behind the NWO assumed that the politics of union could be brought about by the economics of their single currency, the Euro, and they calculated that Europeans would be so in love with the banksters’ materialistic handiwork that they would not object to the dissolution of their nations by uncontrolled immigration from non-European sources.
    But “Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceeds from the mouth of God” (Mt. IV, 4). In fact in the nature of things, religion (man to his God) is primary, politics (man to his fellow-men) are secondary, and economics (man to money) are only tertiary. Therefore it is anti-natural for economics to lead politics, and so nature may be reversed by Revolution, but nature is always liable to re-assert itself, as with the Brexit vote, which was directly provoked by the politicians’ unnatural admission into Britain of hordes of unassimilable foreigners. However, when nature does re-assert itself, modern politicians, atheistic materialists almost to a man, can be taken completely by surprise, as by the Brexit vote. They make war on nature. How can they possibly lead it?
    But who voted all these anti-natural politicians into office? Who else but the peoples (not only of Britain), in accordance with the sacrosanct principle of democracy? Sacrosanct? Yes, because today’s reversal of nature is complete, so that as modern economics are made to overturn politics, so modern politics are made to overturn religion, and democracy becomes a substitute religion, and the will of the people replaces God. This means that the Brexit vote was not valid just because it was the will of the British people, 52 to 48%, but because it favoured what is natural, the God-given identity and various gifts of the European nations, designed by God to make up the symphony of Europe, as was achieved in the Catholic Middle Ages. “Seek first the kingdom of God and His righteousness (religion) and all these things (politics) shall be yours as well” (Mt. VI, 33).
    Does that mean that the British people who voted for Brexit are at all religious? Hardly! For the most part they are atheistic materialists ripe for the Communism of the tyrannical bureaucracy in Brussels, with little more true vision than the politicians they habitually vote for, and just as confused. But the English Channel gives them a certain distance from, and perspective on, what goes on in Europe, so that when it came to the Brexit vote, some ancient natural instincts came into play, the same as those by which they have preserved the semblance – not the substance! – of a Catholic monarchy. However, if the British people are not careful, if they do not “watch and pray ” for their country, the fruits of their original Brexit vote will be stolen from them by the banksters in one way or another. No doubt these are already plotting how to circumvent what seem to them the stupid and backward Brexiteers. God is supremely generous, but He is not mocked, nor is He short-changed!
    Kyrie eleison.
    Start your Amazon.com session by clicking this link, and my family and I get a commission on your purchase!

    Offline Nemmersdorf

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 43
    • Reputation: +100/-13
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Eleison Comments - Brexit Diagnosed 1 (no. 616)
    « Reply #1 on: May 12, 2019, 03:10:14 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!5

  • Written by Orjen Pettersen:
    The rottenness in the lies you’ve been served is now exposed.
    The Leave billionaires – and increasingly evident now, the Russians – donated millions into a campaign to detach the UK from the EU for their own financial and political benefits, supported by thousands of Leave.EU and Russian automated bots and troll farms which targeted social media users with misinformation and lies.
    The Leave millionaire politicians unscrupulously peddled lie after lie to the Leave voters. £350m back. Immigration is bad. We don’t have control of borders. We have lost sovereignty. The EU is falling apart. Turkey is joining. We have to join an EU army. Leaving is easy with the same exact benefits. German car producers will ensure we get a good deal. We will get trade deals by 2019. The EU need us more than we need them. We don’t have to pay the EU anything.
    Every lie is now proven wrong. Every single one.
    The ultra-rich owned right wing and tabloid press spewed out drivel and falsehoods to the ignorant Leave voters. The Telegraph – owned by the tax-haven Channel Islands resident Barclay brothers. The Daily Mail – Bermuda tax-haven registered and owned by the non-domicile Viscount Rothermere. The Sun – foreign-owned by Murdoch with his tax-dodging 62 subsidiaries in the British Virgin Islands, 33 in the Caymans and 15 in Mauritius. The Daily Express – owned by the billionaire Richard Desmond and registered in the tax havens of Luxembourg and the Channel Islands.
    A collection of billionaires and millionaires with a single aim. To protect their tax avoidance in their tax havens. The donors of Brexit. The politicians of Brexit. The media barons of Brexit.
    Why aiming at the EU? The EU was a minor issue in British politics outside a small clique of ‘bastards’ in the Tory party until the last few years.
    It’s simple. The EU took aim at tax avoidance and tax evasion in 2013 based on their experience of Greece where billions where siphoned off by the Greek elite, placed outside of reach from their national tax system . They wanted to target tax avoidance in offshore tax havens in 2015.
    The EU became a threat to the tax avoidance of the billionaires and millionaires.
    A month after the 2015 offshore tax haven decision in the EU, the Tory party announced we would have an EU referendum to leave. Not requested by the public, but now supported by a tax-avoiding tabloid press in overdrive.
    ‘We’ve lost sovereignty to the EU’. ‘EU immigrants destroy our jobs, houses, NHS and schools’. ‘We need to control our borders’.
    Their ignorant reader base were fooled and believed the lies. The aftermath is the biggest political chaos in post-war Britain.
    We never lost sovereignty. The Government even said in its Brexit White Paper that ‘we never lost it – it just felt like it’. We have agreed to 95% of EU laws, we have abstained on 3% and only voted against 2%. We have the same sovereignty as all modern states have.
    We can control immigration. We are out of Schengen which means we can check and deny entry at our airports and ports. We can use EC/2004/38, an EU directive that permits us to send back every EU citizen without a job, funds or comprehensive health care after only 3 months. We have control.
    We have a net economic benefit from immigration. The EU immigrants will each year pay several billions more in tax than they take out in public benefits. The British-born population is net negative and so is non-EU immigration. EU immigration is effectively subsidising public services for the native population in addition to fuelling the economy with much needed intellectual and resource capital.
    Do facts matter to the billionaires and millionaires in business, politics and the tabloid media needing Brexit to protect their hidden fortunes from EU scrutiny?
    No. Their tabloid attack dogs have gone fascist. If you question the benefit of Brexit you become a ‘Traitor’, ‘Saboteur’, ‘Enemy’ and ‘Citizen of Nowhere’.
    As the lies are exposed, the economic damage is clear and their argument is lost, their vitriol becomes a crescendo.
    The vitriol applies to our judges, parliamentarians, celebrities, business leaders and every day citizens. Speak against Brexit and you are treacherous to ‘the will of the people’.
    This is simply wrong. The ‘will of the people’ was 37% of eligible voters or 26% of the population on a given day in an advisory referendum. Democracies can and do change their minds. It’s part of the definition of being one.
    Why is this vitriol so menacing and desperate?
    Again, it is simple. It’s about protection of money and wealth. It’s about securing access to tax havens, threatened by an EU Tax Avoidance Directive crackdown going live in 2019.
    Our Article 50 notification to Leave on 29 March 2019 was not coincidental.
    This is the true ‘control’ and ‘sovereignty’ the tax-avoiding Leave billionaires and millionaires really wanted. It wasn’t for you. It wasn’t for Parliament.
    It was for themselves.
    With an estimated £300 billion of UK taxpayers money hidden away in offshore tax havens, created by the same billionaires and millionaires, the tricks and lies we were given are clear.
    They said we had to be ‘anti-establishment’ and against the ‘elites’. They meant their political opponents and the EU whilst they denied us the tax revenues needed for our housing, healthcare, education, pensions, social care and policing.
    They said austerity was needed to correct our growing deficit and large debt – caused in part by their own tax avoidance equivalent to around 15% of our GDP. They cut public services, security, schools, NHS and social care whilst their own tax avoidance enrichment was systemic.
    Punish the less well off. Protect the wealthy. Blame the punishment on the immigrants and the welfare seekers.
    Scrap the 50p tax rate for millionaires. Drive corporation tax to its lowest level. Keep off shore tax avoidance open.
    Cut the benefits for the disabled. Stop building houses. Invest less per capita for education and healthcare. Take police officers off the street.
    Blame tax-paying Polish builders and Latvian fruit pickers who haven’t got a vote.
    Brexit is a disguise for control of tax avoidance by the ultra-rich elite advocating it. Add to this an opportunity for the same people to remove profit-limiting consumer, employment and environmental protections and further reductions in corporation tax and you can easily see whose ‘will’ is being achieved through leaving the EU.
    We can be fooled once and it’s no shame. Be fooled twice and the joke is now on you.
    http://www.europeanscom.eu/brexit-lies-exposed/
     


    Offline hollingsworth

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2406
    • Reputation: +2616/-297
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Eleison Comments - Brexit Diagnosed 1 (no. 616)
    « Reply #2 on: May 13, 2019, 10:40:25 AM »
  • Thanks!4
  • No Thanks!1

  • If not mistken, “Nemmersdorf” is not a Newbie. He/she was on CI some years ago. Why Nemm should be coming back in this fashion, as an apparent defender of the UK remaining in the EU, is a bit puzzling. I guess what we’re supposed to understand from this article is that the “Leavers” have been dupped by billionaires, who seek to protect their tax shelters and advantages at any cost. So Brits are being lied to. Their national sovereignty is not really being threatened in any significant way by membership in the EU. The banksters and globalists are not in control of this pan European operation. The EU is not a project of the NWO. The UK still has total control over its borders, and can admit only those foreigners of whom they approve, while rejecting, or sending away, all others.

    In other words, this Brexit things is a total ruse, and those millions of Brits who voted for it have been deceived. Is this what we’re supposed to understand, Nemmersdorf?

    Offline claudel

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1096
    • Reputation: +829/-88
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Eleison Comments - Brexit Diagnosed 1 (no. 616)
    « Reply #3 on: May 13, 2019, 01:34:38 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!1
  • In other words, this Brexit thing is a total ruse, and those millions of Brits who voted for it have been deceived. Is this what we’re supposed to understand, Nemmersdorf?

    If this is the same gentleman who comments elsewhere as Karl Nemmersdorf, my suspicion is that the reproduction here of the long, abusive article by an (((Establishment))) shill, a man clearly contemptuous of all the "deluded little people," is to show the falsity and deceitful transparency of the anti-Brexit arguments.

    Look at it this way. Who here would take seriously, let alone be swayed by, a statement declaring that "immigration is bad" is a lie? Who would be aroused to righteous anger when reading the sentence "[Pro-Brexit] tabloid attack dogs have gone fascist"? And only an utter fool would be taken in by the claim that "we never lost sovereignty," "we can control immigration," or "we have a net economic benefit from immigration." One may still hear ordinary Brits say, when they are being told to believe such rubbish, "Pull the other one, mate."

    Last but not least, the article has not a single word about the leadership of the Stay mob being composed entirely of Jews and of sellout Gentiles who are plainly in the Jews' pay. Everyone (except poche) who thinks that that is a mere coincidence, please raise your hand!

    What about the less than likely case that Nemmersdorf's intention in posting the article is to sway readers to the Stay side? Well, he would have to be a lot thicker than pro-Brexit voters are claimed to have been to post such an article at this site, where Bishop Williamson's opinion is widely regarded as normative unless demonstrated otherwise.

    So all in all, however absurd and transparently misleading the article posted by Nemmersdorf may be and whatever the motivation for posting it, it is useful for revealing the mind-set and motivation of the powerful anti-sovereignty forces arrayed against the Cross and the remnants of the Christian West. Such information is always good to have.

    Offline Nemmersdorf

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 43
    • Reputation: +100/-13
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Eleison Comments - Brexit Diagnosed 1 (no. 616)
    « Reply #4 on: May 13, 2019, 01:51:33 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!2
  • My answers to old friend Hollingsworth:

    Hollingsworth: the “Leavers” have been duped by billionaires, who seek to protect their tax shelters and advantages at any cost :

    My answer :TRUE

    Hollingsworth So Brits are being lied to:

    My answer:TRUE

    Hollingsworth Their national sovereignty is not really being threatened in any significant way by membership in the EU:

    My answer :NOT TRUE (the UK are always in control, as each member state of the EU has a veto to object, read the article again properly!)

    Hollingsworth :The banksters and globalists are not in control of this pan European operation.:

    My answer : the banksters are in control of everything.

    Hollingsworth :The UK still has total control over its borders, and can admit only those foreigners of whom they approve, while rejecting, or sending away, all others.

    My answer: read the article again properly:
     “We can control immigration. We are out of Schengen which means we can check and deny entry at our airports and ports. We can use EC/2004/38, an EU directive that permits us to send back every EU citizen without a job, funds or comprehensive health care after only 3 months. We have control.”

    Hollingsworth : The EU is not a project of the NOW :

    My answer: The UK and the US together are certainly in charge of the NOW (remember 9/11?! – nothing to do with the EU)  and together they are probably also in charge of the EU!

    Hollingsworth: In other words, this Brexit things is a total ruse, and those millions of Brits who voted for it have been deceived.

    My answer: Everybody has been lied to and deceived, and also the millions of people who have voted to remain and all the young people of this country.
     
    And because of Schengen: NO hordes of unassimilable foreigners” (Brexit Diagnosed – I) have ever invaded the UK (only the Normans in 1066!!!).


    Offline Nemmersdorf

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 43
    • Reputation: +100/-13
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Eleison Comments - Brexit Diagnosed 1 (no. 616)
    « Reply #5 on: May 13, 2019, 02:58:16 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Errata:
    NWO instead of NOW, sorry for the mistake.


    Offline hollingsworth

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2406
    • Reputation: +2616/-297
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Eleison Comments - Brexit Diagnosed 1 (no. 616)
    « Reply #6 on: May 13, 2019, 03:17:05 PM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!0
  • Claudel:

    Quote
    If this is the same gentleman who comments elsewhere as Karl Nemmersdorf, my suspicion is that the reproduction here of the long, abusive article by an (((Establishment))) shill, a man clearly contemptuous of all the "deluded little people," is to show the falsity and deceitful transparency of the anti-Brexit arguments.

    Do you mean ‘pro-Brexit arguments?’ Sorry, but I’m a bit confused.

    As for Brexit and the article reprinted by Nemmersdorf. I can not really argue intelligently on either side of the issue. Too beyond my ken. Nemm says I need to read the article more carefully. Perhaps so.
    One thing seems pretty clear: Nemmersdorf would take issue with Bp. Williamson and with the leader of the new Brexit party, Nigel Farage. Does Nemm question the underlying motives of Farage? Does he/she number the Brexit leader among the billionaires he is exposing?

     
    Maybe Nemm feels that H.E. just doesn’t have it straight. He’s drunk the Brexit kool-aid. He’s bought the Brexit argument hook line and sinker. Because I doubt that Williamson would knowingly and consciously make common cause with the elite whom Pettersen excoriates. And we can pretty well be assured that the good bishop is not trying to protect his own tax shelters and investments.

     
    About Nemmendorf: Well, what about it? Are you this fellow Karl Nemmersdorf, a person I’ve never heard of, btw. And is Pettersen one of the chosen?

    Offline claudel

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1096
    • Reputation: +829/-88
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Eleison Comments - Brexit Diagnosed 1 (no. 616)
    « Reply #7 on: May 13, 2019, 03:46:20 PM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!1
  • Dear Holly,

    No, I meant anti-Brexit. That is to say, as the anti-Brexit case made by the Pettersen article is so fundamentally deceitful and manipulative, I thought it likely that Nemmersdorf was offering it to us here in a facetious or sarcastic vein. On the basis of his reply to you, however, I take it that I was mistaken. That is, Nemmersdorf agrees with the article and has offered it to persuade us. Amazing, n'est-ce pas?

    Is it likely that many malefactors of great wealth will profit from Brexit—if it is ever implemented, that is? Of course! Why would any adult assume otherwise? But advancing this obvious observation as somehow genuinely informative conveniently overlooks the fact that the truly criminal rich, of whom either a majority or a large plurality are Jews, have made and will continue to make untold millions more through their connection with the EU, which is nothing less than the kindlier-faced successor to the Soviet Communist (i.e., Jewish) slave state.

    Besides, even if the EU were as beneficial to the little guy and as invidious to the evil rich guy as Petterson and Nemmersdorf falsely claim, we all would be obliged to oppose it anyway because of its outright rejection both of the foundational significance of Christianity to Europe's past and of the Cross as an essential component of present and future European society and governance.

    Have I sufficiently clarified what I was saying?


    Offline Nemmersdorf

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 43
    • Reputation: +100/-13
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Eleison Comments - Brexit Diagnosed 1 (no. 616)
    « Reply #8 on: May 14, 2019, 04:36:22 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!2
  • https://www.gilad.co.uk/writings/2019/2/3/israel-uk-and-brexit
    Israel, UK and Brexit
     
    Introduction by GA: The following is a translation of the last segment of an article in Ynet  yesterday on Brexit. The article explains that: the Jewish State has located itself as post Brexit Britain’s gateway to the world: “Once out of the EU, Britain will have to sign separate trade agreements with each state, and Israel will be the first.” And that: “Israel has become Britain’s strategic ally.” And, of course, “the British government totally disregard the boycott campaign against Israel. On a political level, they boycotted the boycott.” 
     
    A few years ago we learned that back in 1982 Oded Yinon devised an Israeli ‘plan for the Middle East.’ The following Ynet’s segment provides us with a glimpse into the current ‘Israel’s plan for Britain.’
     
    If you have been puzzled by the insane institutional campaign against Corbyn  (BOD, Jewish Chronicle, CAA, etc.) the Ynet article raises the possibility that the campaign has not actually been about ‘antisemitism.’ It is more likely about shekles: Corbyn in Number Ten could easily interfere with ‘Israel’s plans for Britain.’ The Ynet article may also help Brits to understand the bipartisan forces that operate intensively to push Britain to break away from the EU. For some reason some of the staunch Israel supporters within the Government and in the Parliament are also pushing hard for Brexit. Ask yourself, do they do it for Britain, Brits and British national interests or are they, once again, serving the interests of that dark and oppressive foreign state.   
     
    The Brexit Hurricane
     “…It turns out that on some fronts the British began to prepare in advance. When it decided to withdraw from the European Union, Britain was even more enthusiastic about reaching agreements to sign bilateral trade agreements, this time not through the EU, but with countries around the world. The Brits saw the signing of these trade agreements as evidence of Britain's steadfastness. Time and time again, British leaders, headed by Teresa May, said that "Britain can maximise its business and commercial potential beyond the EU as well." Israel was one of the first stations in that campaign. Once out of the EU, Britain will have to sign such agreements with each state, and Israel will be the first.
     
     In recent years, Israel has become Britain’s strategic ally. Innovation, technological, intelligence and cyber capabilities have made Israel one of the most popular potential partners in Britain. The volume of trade between the two countries rose to a record $ 11 billion last year, of which $ 5 billion was Israeli exports to Britain, and the rest was British imports to Israel. After the United States, Britain is the largest exporter to Israel, and trade relations span a wide range of fields - energy, pharmaceuticals, food and technology - and the British government's total disregard of the boycott organizations against Israel. On the political level, they boycotted the boycott.
     
     In the past year, teams of British and Israeli economic ministries have gathered to discuss bilateral trade agreements. They had to draft new agreements, since the current trade agreements between the two countries were within the framework of the European Union. Ohad Cohen, head of the Foreign Trade Department in the Ministry of Economics, who was in charge of the talks on the Israeli side, said that the British had entered talks with a simple task: to continue without unnecessary shocks, to repeat most of the clauses in the agreement that Israel signed with the EU in 1995.
     
     "They came and said, 'Whatever was, will be,'" Cohen said. "In other words, they wanted Israel to continue to trade with Britain on the same terms, with full customs exemptions, and to make very small changes to existing agreements, especially in quantities. Britain has named Israel as one of the first countries with which it wants to sign a bilateral agreement, and it is important for the British government to ensure that the commercial ties between the two countries are not harmed."
     
     According to Cohen, the negotiations were oblivious to the many changes that have stirred the British political system in the past year. The British did not arrive with any panic for the negotiations with Israel, not even when ministers resigned one by one and Theresa May's government was crushed under the wheels of Brexit. "The only difference is that they were required to set up a unit that deals with trade agreements, which they did not have before, because before everything went through the EU institutions in Brussels," says Cohen.
     
     Thus, in the coming month a trade agreement between the two countries is supposed to be signed. After Israel, Britain expects  to sign trade agreements with some 70 other countries, including its closest ally, the US. The agreement with the Americans is very important, because for a Brexit government this is a prestigious card and a proof that Britain can stand on its feet even outside the European Union…”

     
    My battle for truth and freedom involves  some expensive legal services. I hope that you will consider committing to a monthly donation in whatever amount you can give. Regular contributions will enable me to avoid being pushed against a wall and to stay on top of the endless harassment by Zionist operators attempting to silence me.
    Gilad
     
    http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?author=109
    Gilad Atzmon, a former Israeli soldier now a writer and an award winning Jazz musician resident in London, where he lives in virtual exile

    Offline claudel

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1096
    • Reputation: +829/-88
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Eleison Comments - Brexit Diagnosed 1 (no. 616)
    « Reply #9 on: May 14, 2019, 04:40:11 PM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!1
  • Blah, blah, blah …
    Two can play the linking game. Unlike Nemmersdorf, however, I don't need to pound the table with huge boldface type as a substitute for facts.

    Here is a link to a close and careful analysis of who truly profits from staying in the EU and undermining the popular (i.e., Christian) will to get out of it forever.

    Offline hollingsworth

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2406
    • Reputation: +2616/-297
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Eleison Comments - Brexit Diagnosed 1 (no. 616)
    « Reply #10 on: May 14, 2019, 10:23:36 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Thanks, Claudel, for the link to this Occidental Observer.  As the author admits, Jewish attitudes towards Brexit are not entirely clear.  But, he writes:

    Quote
    Nevertheless, there can be little doubt that the recent push to have Parliament vote on Brexit is very much a Jewish project.

    No doubt.  The Jewish involvement in the Brexit debate appears to be pretty clear.  That only .5% of the British population is Jewish reflects suspiciously upon the apparent anti-Brexit sentiments of a disproportionate number of prominent UK Jews, who work tirelessly to oppose the popular will, and who seem hell bent upon overturning the vote in Parliament.  I think, maybe, I understand this article better than the one submitted originally by Nemmersdorf.  Does full Brexit, tentatively, gore the Jewish ox?  I think it might.   


    Offline Nemmersdorf

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 43
    • Reputation: +100/-13
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Eleison Comments - Brexit Diagnosed 1 (no. 616)
    « Reply #11 on: May 15, 2019, 01:07:21 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1

  • Saturday, July 9, 2016
    Bishop Williamson- Brexit – Really?
    Brexit – Really?
    Brexit reminds us once again –
     To build without God is to build in vain.
     
     
    Many readers of these “Comments” must be supposing that as an Englishman who does not at all like the New World Order, I must be rejoicing over the recent vote by the British people, albeit by a relatively narrow margin, to leave the communistic European Union. Alas, I have to admit that all I have ever learnt over the last tens of years about that NWO makes me doubt that the apparent exit of Britain will amount finally to any real re-affirmation of what was once best in Great Britain. Across the Atlantic likewise, I may love Trump and hate Hilary, but surely the two have been put together to make up for us one Punch and Judy show.
     
     
    Take for instance, concerning Brexit, the June 24 article of a high-grade American truth-teller, Paul Craig Roberts (see paulcraigroberts.org) on why “Despite the vote, the Odds are Against Britain leaving the EU.” He writes: “The British people should not be so naïve as to think that the vote settles the matter. The fight has only begun.” He warns the British people to expect: their government to come back to them and say, the EU is giving us a better deal so let’s stay in; the Fed, ECB, BOJ and NY hedge funds to hammer the pound sterling as proof that the Brexit vote is sinking Britain’s economy (that hammering has already happened); the Brexit vote to be presented as having weakened Europe in front of “Russian aggression” (which is a sheer NWO fabrication); leading Brexiters to come under pressure to reach a compromise with the EU; etc., etc. And Roberts says readers can imagine for themselves many more such probabilities, reminding them how Ireland voted against Europe years ago until it was pressured to vote for.
     
    However, at http://henrymakow.com/2016/06/brexit-what-is-the-globalist-game.html, in my opinion another article goes deeper still, because Henry Makow goes further behind the Punch and Judy show, because he has the advantage of being what the globalists no doubt call an “anti-semite,” or rather a “Jew-hater” because Makow is himself a Jew. Truly, only those with some handle on the Messiah, or the Christ, can take the measure of the Antichrist.
     
    The article’s thesis is that “Brexiters lamented how the Establishment was ranged against them, but in truth the reverse was the reality.” To prove this thesis the article names by name numerous British politicians, both Tory and Labour, who are more or less fervent globalists and who campaigned for Brexit (it should be easy enough to check the names for anyone who wishes). Similarly in the British media, the article names numerous journals and journalists, normally presstituted for globalism, who campaigned for Brexit. Then what was Brexit for? The article credits Putin with getting much closer to the truth when he suggested that it was to “blackmail” Europe into making better terms with Britain. The article goes further: Brexit was designed to force Europe to “surrender completely to Anglo-American Zionist war-mongers and corporate privateers,” and the article concludes that Brexit was “most certainly no triumph against globalism.” And Makow himself adds: “Evidently the powers-that-be have decided that England outside Europe rather than inside can be a more effective instrument of Masonic central bank world tyranny.”
     

     Maybe such speculations (but not their level) are off the mark, but for sure and certain, what are either Europe or Britain worth without God? To build without him is to build in vain, says the Psalmist. Yet who in all the Brexit debate ever even mentions his name? If Brexit is to amount to anything truly positive, it will need a leader with vision. Without God, where will he come from?
     
    Kyrie eleison.
     

    Offline claudel

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1096
    • Reputation: +829/-88
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Eleison Comments - Brexit Diagnosed 1 (no. 616)
    « Reply #12 on: May 15, 2019, 02:00:14 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
  • Nemmersdorf confirms his dishonest intent by using boldface monster type (what, again?) to falsely suggest that the emphasized passages represent the opinion of Bishop Williamson. As all except those who are easily deceived can see, they don't.

    The payoff quote in the cited Eleison Comment is actually a sentence buried neck-deep in a swamp of megatype: "Maybe such speculations are off the mark … but for sure and certain, what [is] either Europe or Britain worth without God? To build without him is to build in vain, says the Psalmist."

    In short, Brexit is not a cure-all, nor is it likely to become one without Britain's return to Christ and His Cross. Such a return, however, is not ipso facto forestalled by Brexit, whereas it is formally and materially impossible within the European Union, which is the latest attempt at doing the job the EU's founders' ancestors in Pilate's courtyard mistakenly thought they had done.

    Offline Nemmersdorf

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 43
    • Reputation: +100/-13
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Eleison Comments - Brexit Diagnosed 1 (no. 616)
    « Reply #13 on: May 15, 2019, 02:11:11 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1

  • Saturday, July 9, 2016
    Bishop Williamson- Brexit – Really?
    Brexit – Really?
    Brexit reminds us once again –
     To build without God is to build in vain.
     
     
    Many readers of these “Comments” must be supposing that as an Englishman who does not at all like the New World Order, I must be rejoicing over the recent vote by the British people, albeit by a relatively narrow margin, to leave the communistic European Union. Alas, I have to admit that all I have ever learnt over the last tens of years about that NWO makes me doubt that the apparent exit of Britain will amount finally to any real re-affirmation of what was once best in Great Britain. Across the Atlantic likewise, I may love Trump and hate Hilary, but surely the two have been put together to make up for us one Punch and Judy show.
     
     
     
     Take for instance, concerning Brexit, the June 24 article of a high-grade American truth-teller, Paul Craig Roberts (see paulcraigroberts.org) on why “Despite the vote, the Odds are Against Britain leaving the EU.” He writes: “The British people should not be so naïve as to think that the vote settles the matter. The fight has only begun.” He warns the British people to expect: their government to come back to them and say, the EU is giving us a better deal so let’s stay in; the Fed, ECB, BOJ and NY hedge funds to hammer the pound sterling as proof that the Brexit vote is sinking Britain’s economy (that hammering has already happened); the Brexit vote to be presented as having weakened Europe in front of “Russian aggression” (which is a sheer NWO fabrication); leading Brexiters to come under pressure to reach a compromise with the EU; etc., etc. And Roberts says readers can imagine for themselves many more such probabilities, reminding them how Ireland voted against Europe years ago until it was pressured to vote for.
     


    However, at http://henrymakow.com/2016/06/brexit-what-is-the-globalist-game.html, in my opinion another article goes deeper still, because Henry Makow goes further behind the Punch and Judy show, because he has the advantage of being what the globalists no doubt call an “anti-semite,” or rather a “Jew-hater” because Makow is himself a Jew. Truly, only those with some handle on the Messiah, or the Christ, can take the measure of the Antichrist.
     
    The article’s thesis is that “Brexiters lamented how the Establishment was ranged against them, but in truth the reverse was the reality.” To prove this thesis the article names by name numerous British politicians, both Tory and Labour, who are more or less fervent globalists and who campaigned for Brexit (it should be easy enough to check the names for anyone who wishes). Similarly in the British media, the article names numerous journals and journalists, normally presstituted for globalism, who campaigned for Brexit. Then what was Brexit for? The article credits Putin with getting much closer to the truth when he suggested that it was to “blackmail” Europe into making better terms with Britain. The article goes further: Brexit was designed to force Europe to “surrender completely to Anglo-American Zionist war-mongers and corporate privateers,” and the article concludes that Brexit was “most certainly no triumph against globalism.” And Makow himself adds: “Evidently the powers-that-be have decided that England outside Europe rather than inside can be a more effective instrument of Masonic central bank world tyranny.”
     

     Maybe such speculations (but not their level) are off the mark, but for sure and certain, what are either Europe or Britain worth without God? To build without him is to build in vain, says the Psalmist. Yet who in all the Brexit debate ever even mentions his name? If Brexit is to amount to anything truly positive, it will need a leader with vision. Without God, where will he come from?
     
    Kyrie eleison.

    Offline Nemmersdorf

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 43
    • Reputation: +100/-13
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Eleison Comments - Brexit Diagnosed 1 (no. 616)
    « Reply #14 on: May 17, 2019, 03:02:33 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1


  •  http://christianobserver.net/brexit-what-is-the-hidden-globalist-game/
    https://www.henrymakow.com/2016/06/brexit-what-is-the-globalist-game.html

    Brexit- What is the Hidden Globalist Game?
    June 26, 2016
    Boris Johnson's stepmother Jenny, the second wife of his father Stanley, is the stepdaughter of Edward Sieff, the former chairman of Marks & Spencer
     
     The prompt acceptance of the narrow referendum win should make you suspicious. Brexit is supposed to be a blow to the masonic Jew World Order. But all the usual suspects including the mass media supported it. What trick do the globalists have up their sleeve?
     
     
     "Brexit is pure political theatre for the gullible masses and nothing more...Throughout the campaign, Brexiters lamented how the establishment was ranged against them, but in truth the reverse was the reality."
     
     
    By Northsider
    Brexit- Another Jewish Dialectic?
    (henrymakow.com)
     
    There is great rejoicing in much of the so called alternative media over the "Brexit" result in yesterday's British referendum on membership of the European Union. If more proof were needed that the alternative media is often misinformed and credulous, this is it.
     
    Alternative types, from David Duke to David Icke, have of course been insisting for months that the Brexit movement represents a mighty blow against Zio-globalism. There may be some excuse for Duke to believe this guff: he is, after all, an American and presumably relies on British "white nationalists" for information about such matters. There is little or no excuse for British white nationalists themselves, or for British critics of Zionism like Icke, to be so deceived.

     

    Unless they have been paying very scant attention indeed, they should have noticed that the Brexit movement is overwhelmingly dominated not just by common or garden variety Zionists, but by hard-core Zionist ultras of a particularly toxic variety. For example, Boris Johnson, the part-Jewish de facto frontman for Brexit, describes himself as "a passionate Zionist" and supports with an equal passion both the corrupt City of London and mass migration to Europe.
     
    But compared to Michael Gove, the other leading Tory Brexit spokesman and senior British cabinet member, Boris is a veritable peacenik. Gove has never seen a Zio-war he didn't like. A former journalist with the Zionist London Times newspaper, he once penned the following excruciating line about war criminal Blair: "I can't help myself! I love Tony!".
     

    It's worth pointing out, by the way, that Johnson, and more especially Gove, are close personal friends of British Prime Minister David Cameron, which makes it, therefore, more than plausible to suggest that their dispute over Brexit is pure political theatre for the gullible masses and nothing more.
     
    Chris Grayling, another senior Tory Brexiter, is a member of British Israel Communications and Research Centre (BICOM), a Zionist lobby group. When he was secretary of state for Justice and Lord Chancellor, Grayling declared war on "extremists", the working definition of which, he made clear, amounted to anyone who criticized Israel or the War on Terror.
     
    Theresa Villiers, the British Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, and Brexiter, is an "officer" of the Conservative Friends of Israel (CFI) and ardent Zionist.
     
    Iain Duncan Smith, a long standing supporter of Brexit, who resigned recently from his senior ministry in the Cameron government, also belongs to the CFI, as indeed do nearly all the leading Tory Brexiters.
     

    Then there's Liam Fox, left, another Neocon ultra, who was forced to resign from his job as Secretary of State for Defence, after it was revealed that billionaire Israeli arms dealer, Poju Zabludowicz, was funding his jet setting playboy lifestyle, and that of his erstwhile "adviser" Adam Werrity.
     
    It isn't just on the Tory side where Brexit goes with passionate Zionism. One of the small handful of Labour Party Brexit supporters was Gisela Stuart, a German born Zionist, and a member of the Neocon "Henry Jackson Society". Stuart received lavish media coverage throughout the campaign - courtesy of her Zionist friends at the BBC. Other Labour Brexit supporters like Kate Hoey and Frank Field, also strongly support Israel.
     
    THE ZIONIST-CONTROLLED MEDIA
     

    Then there's the media: Murdoch's soft-porn rags have fervently advocated for Brexit since well before the vote was called. Ditto the soft core porn Daily Mail, and the Daily Express, owned by Zionist hard-porn baron, Richard Desmond. The Telegraph is if anything even more Neocon than the Murdoch press, and likewise took a strong pro-Brexit stance. Even those media one might normally expect to be pro-EU adopted a distinctly ambivalent approach to the issue.
     
    For example, the Guardian and the Independent published many articles in support of leaving the EU. By the same token, in one of the key televised debates on the Brexit issue, the BBC slanted the panel three to two in favour of Brexit. One of the two pro "spokespersons" ... was Eddie Izzard, a buffoonish and widely despised transvestite "comedian" who appeared on the panel with bright red lip stick, mascara, nail varnish and clad in a woman's jacket and blouse, and a pink beret. Not exactly an advocate designed to appeal to the undecided voters of middle England...
     

    (Julie Burchill of The Guardian, draped in Israeli flag, part of the pro-Brexit Pressitute corps.)
     
    When it comes to individual journalists, the roll call of pro-Brexiters in general corresponded to the leading names in "Zio-presstitution": Julie Burchill, Douglas Murray, Charles Moore, Julia Hartley Brewer, Matthew Parris, Toby Young, Janet Daley, and even Peter Hitchens - who in spite of his stated reservations about western invasions around the world, always can be relied upon to stoutly defend the Israeli state. 
     
    Throughout the campaign, Brexiters lamented how the establishment was ranged against them, but in truth the reverse was the reality. Indeed, ironically enough the corporate media eagerly spun the Leave campaign meme of the referendum as a David and Goliath contest between the plucky Brexit underdog and the nasty pro-EU ruling elite. Moreover, unlike the case of the Scottish independence referendum two years ago, there were very few corporate celebs rushing to support the pro-EU side.
     
    In the Scottish referendum, almost anyone who was anyone in showbiz - Mick Jagger, Paul McCartney, Kate Moss, et al - put their name to a letter calling on Scotland to stay in the United Kingdom. No such closing of celeb ranks took place against Brexit - which in itself goes a long way to refuting the notion that Brexit was an anti-establishment cause.
     
    THE ZIO GAME?
     
    So if the Zio-globalists favoured Brexit, what was their game? Not for the first time, the Russians seemed to have got closer to the reality than many of the western alternative media did.
     
     
    Last week Putin suggested that Cameron had called the referendum in order to "blackmail" the rest of Europe  The evidence for this theory is compelling. It should be remembered that for all their self-serving chauvinistic rhetoric, the British Neocons don't dislike the EU on account of its control by corrupt transnationals and even more corrupt bankers: au contraire they want it to be even MORE controlled by these forces than it already is. 
     
    The referendum was clearly a move to force the EU to undertake "root and branch reform", i.e., to surrender completely to Anglo-American Zionist warmongers and corporate privateers. In all the phoney euphoria over the Brexit result, it's easily forgotten that in so far as there has been opposition to Zionist war-mongering, surveillance and privatization within the EU, it has certainly not come from Britain.
     
    Furthermore the desire of British Neocons to force the EU's hand is not really a secret: in the very early days of the referendum campaign, Boris Johnson and another leading Brexiter, former Tory leader, Michael Howard, both stated that a Brexit vote was a way of forcing Europe to make better terms with Britain.
     
    For all its bellyaching, the British Zio-masonic state already gets much better terms from the EU than most European nations - not surprising since the EU is not, as British chauvinists of Hitchens' type ludicrously claim, a German imperialist project, but rather a vehicle for Anglo-American Zionist dominion.
     
    For instance Angela Merkel agreed to take in a million refugees to Germany, while Britain has agreed to take in a paltry 20,000 over five years. By the same token the French are compelled by their Anglo-masters to oversee huge refugee camps on their northern coast - in order to prevent migrants making it to Britain.
     
    None of the above is to in any way argue that opposition to the EU is misguided, but simply to illustrate that in this particular referendum there were no good guys. A triumph against globalism, Brexit most certainly was not.
     
     

     

    Sitemap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16