Last time I checked, the OP is the most recent article produced by Bishop Williamson.

It's really pathetic how you're such a sniveling toady / lackey that you're not man enough to disagree about anything Bishop Williamson says.  He's clearly wrong about this matter, and he'd be better served by not being surrounded by brown-nosed suck-ups like yourself.  One doesn't have to be as rude and as disrespectful as the Frs. Pfeiffer and Hewko, but not only is it permissible for his "followers" to criticize him, but it's necessary ... since he could very well be doing the devil's work here by promoting the notion that the NOM is acceptable to God.

You can play word games and semantics all you want, so even if you claim that Bishop Williamson didn't say it's acceptable to attend the NOM, it doesn't take a genius to figure out that it could easily be taken that way by the faithful, so perhaps even you can grasp it, Sean.  "I can attend the NOM without danger to my faith, so I'd rather go to daily Mass at the Novus Ordo here to receive the Sacraments."

NOM is a Protestantized bastardization of the Catholic Mass, and I hold that, as such, it objectively displeases and offends God.

And ... here we go.

Bishop Williamson:
So we've shifted from the NOM can be valid to attending the NOM can be "acceptable."

If you recall, when I argued that the devil can easily simulate such "miracles" (assuming they can't be written off as fraudulent), I speculated about WHY the devil WOULD simulate such "miracles", namely, to give people, including Traditional Catholics, the impression that God is not displeased with the NOM and that it's "acceptable" to assist at it.

It's one thing to say that the NOM might be valid, and quite another thing to say that it's "acceptable" to attend it.  I TOLD you that these "miracles" could be construed or taken in a way that people might be persuaded that it's OK to assist at the NOM.  For the devil, it's MISSION ACCOMPLISHED.

Now, I don't know for sure that these are even legit.  What isn't covered by Bishop Williamson is that one Catholic scientist concluded that the red substance on one of the Polish "miraculous" hosts could very well be a kind of red mold, and that the female Catholic scientist who concluded that it was miraculous may have just been looking for it to be a miracle out of the gate and thus found what she wanted to find.  It's interesting that the two Polish events follow the same pattern, a host that was dropped, then placed into a cup of water to be dissolved, only for someone to find the red splotches at a later time.  Both in Poland.  Could there be something in the wheat or in the environment in Poland that's conducive to the growth of some kind of red mold?  But, even IF these can't be explained through natural causes, the devil can easily simulate them ... and for the reasons stated.

Correct.  Active attendance at the New Mass is an intrinsically evil act.

Very mature, as usual, Sean.  And, as usual, not a lick of substance.

Um... did I miss something? I just read the entire EC and didn't see any change from his past about anything. He's giving his thoughts and opinions, he's on his soapbox -- nothing more. I saw no ultimatums, no demands for anyone to "tow the line" or anything like your above quote suggests.

Yeah, that was more from Loudestmouth's magical world of make believe, where he tried to create yet another position for +Williamson.  Thoroughly refuted throughout (at least for anyone with any common sense).