http://stmarcelinitiative.com/eleison-comments/?lang=en




Bishops
February 20, 2016


Number CDXLIX (449)
Printable PDF

The SSPX is no way “out of the woods.”
Resistant bishops must “deliver the goods”!

Ever since the General Chapter of July, 2012, when under Bishop Fellay’s direction the Society of St Pius X took a decisive lurch towards a compromise agreement with Conciliar Rome, Catholics of Tradition have wondered where the two other SSPX bishops stand, Bishop Tissier de Mallerais (BpT) and Bishop de Galarreta (BpG), because both have been rather discreet in public since that time. However, firm words spoken by each of them last month have raised hopes for the future of the SSPX. Are the hopes justified? Catholics may need to remain on their guard . . .

The Confirmations sermon of BpT given on January 31 in Saarbrücken in Germany could not have been more upright or clear. For instance: In the SSPX’s confrontation with Rome, it may never go in for compromise or double-dealing. We can never negotiate with Rome so long as the representatives of the Newchurch (sic) cling to the errors of Vatican II. Any talk of ours with Rome must be unambiguous, and have as its purpose the conversion of the Newchurch representatives back to our one and only truth of Catholic Tradition. No compromise or double-dealing until they have got over their Conciliar errors, and have converted back to the Truth.

Admirable words! Uprightness is not BpT’s problem. He is no politician, God bless him. His problem is that when it comes to putting words into action, his “Fiftiesism” makes him obey his Superior and fall back in line with the politicians of SSPX HQ in Menzingen. Nothing indicates that this will not happen again this time, but we may always pray that, as the proverb says, “Even a worm will turn.” BpT is far from a worm, but he is hiding from himself, or genuinely cannot see, the full malice of Menzingen’s action. It is not just the unity and welfare of the SSPX which is at stake, but the Catholic Faith.

On the contrary BpG is a politician. Unfortunately we do not have the full text of the conference he gave in Bailly, France, on January 17, because his exact words count, so we can only quote from a summary of his main thoughts: Rome’s latest theological and canonical proposals for a Rome-SSPX agreement remain unacceptable, but the Pope certainly wants an agreement and he is perfectly capable of overriding his own officials and of imposing a “unilateral” recognition on the SSPX. Such a recognition could definitely harm the SSPX internally, but if the SSPX had done nothing to obtain it, then there is nothing that the SSPX could do about it. However, Providence would once more watch over the Archbishop’s work.

But, your Excellency, Menzingen has now for many years been doing all it can by political negotiation to arrive at official recognition by Rome, and its eventual “unilateral” arrival would be a mere pretence to deceive Traditionalists so as to sell out the SSPX under cover of claiming, no doubt with Rome’s permission behind the scenes, that it was all Rome’s fault. But the fact would remain that the Archbishop’s Society would finally be betrayed, and you with your own “No, no, a thousand times no . . . but possibly, yes” would have to answer for not having done all you could and should have done to block its betrayal.

In brief, that emergency lighting system of the Universal Church in Conciliar darkness, which is the SSPX, is itself flickering and in danger of no longer giving light. Therefore that repair team to sustain the emergency lighting, which is the “Resistance,” is still needed, and that team needs a sufficiency of good foremen. A third bishop for the “Resistance” is planned, as last year for March 19 at the monastery near Nova Friburgo in Brazil. He is its Prior, Fr Thomas Aquinas, faithful warrior and veteran of the post-Conciliar war for the Faith. May God be with him, and with all the humble and faithful servants of God.

Kyrie eleison.

Am I reading this correctly? Dom Thomas Aquinas is going to be consecrated a bishop?

That's what he's saying -- on March 19th.

Why no secrecy this time? Seems strange to me..... Its been said before BW needs to watch his back,

Sounds like awesome news to me.   :cheers:

I hope his Excellency keeps 'em coming and that they are geographically planted.  

Flying the airlines with impunity may not be an option in the not too distant future for Catholics.  

I am taken by surprise. I wasn't expecting another so soon and I hope it isn't a reflection of poor health on the part of +Williamson or +Faure, though I know they are older. It has raised a few contradictory emotions for me. Happiness but also fear for some reason, I couldn't tell you why. We have precious few good bishops, I am praying God confirms them in grace.

I'm not surprised. He'd made the comment in Canada about Bishops "popping up like mushrooms" and he also believes, like GerardFE, that there should be a suitable bishop for every geographic region in the event that international travel becomes increasingly difficult.

Restrictions are already in place. BpW has already been refused entry to Australia.

"All things are possible with God."

Quote from: wallflower

I am taken by surprise. I wasn't expecting another so soon and I hope it isn't a reflection of poor health on the part of +Williamson or +Faure, though I know they are older. It has raised a few contradictory emotions for me. Happiness but also fear for some reason, I couldn't tell you why. We have precious few good bishops, I am praying God confirms them in grace.

I'm not surprised. He'd made the comment in Canada about Bishops "popping up like mushrooms" and he also believes, like GerardFE, that there should be a suitable bishop for every geographic region in the event that international travel becomes increasingly difficult.

True. I guess I shouldn't be surprised. It just makes it all so official. The days of relying on the 4 SSPX bishops is nearly a thing of the past.