Author Topic: Eleison comments 380 October 25, 2014 (Read 40631 times)

Ladislaus · « **Reply #220 on:** October 31, 2014, 02:43:03 PM »

Just to illustrate my previous point. Since the the comparison is split across two different ECs it may not jump out at people.

Quote from: Eleison Comments 379

For instance in the 1930’s, Pope Pius XI was well aware of Our Lady’s first request, but he never performed the Consecration of Russia. Why not? According to Brother Michael of the Holy Trinity in the second of his excellent three volumes on The Whole Truth About Fatima, it was because Pius XI was engaged at that time in diplomatic contacts with the Russian authorities in Moscow, and he thought that his own diplomacy was a better way of dealing with Communists than Our Lady’s Consecration. He preferred the human to the divine way of dealing with the problem, and so of course the problem remained unsolved.

Quote from: Eleison Comments 380

Still Bishop Fellay hesitated to commit himself, so in early 2008 Our Lady came back even more insistently with the same request for the Crusade to be dedicated to the Consecration. The problem was that Bishop Fellay had long been working on his own plan to solve the Church crisis by a reconciliation between the Society of St Pius X and Rome, and Our Lady’s request did not fit in with that plan. Therefore the more progress he seemed to be making with the Romans towards reconciliation, the more difficult it was becoming for him to keep his promise of doing what she asked, because he knew that what she asked would upset the Romans.

Thus the point behind Bishop Williamson's narrative.

holmoak · « **Reply #221 on:** October 31, 2014, 02:47:38 PM »

Quote from: Militia Jesu

With me, also, bishop Williamson has shown signs of belief and skeptiscm. What is the turning point that finally made him take such a terrible and wrong decision? A couple of priests from Europe/South America --very friends of him-- think this is just a sort of veiled revenge against bishop Fellay. IMO that is a good guess, especially if one considers the opportunistic "visionary" knew exactly how to take advantage of all this.

That is what a few of us have been saying for the past several years. That she was able to find a weakness and manipulate it.

Militia Jesu · « **Reply #222 on:** October 31, 2014, 02:49:39 PM »

Quote from: Matthew

Quote from: holmoak
Quote from: Matthew
I have been informed that Dawn Marie (A____a A______n) is visiting Boston, KY tomorrow with the aim of convincing Fr. Pfeiffer and Fr. Hewko that her visions are genuine.

I guess by appearing in person it will be easier to win them over?

Kyrie Eleison indeed.

It's today, meeting going on right now.

On Halloween. The pagan high holy day. Great.

...and the anniversary of the diabolical protestant 'reform'. :devil2:

Centroamerica · « **Reply #223 on:** October 31, 2014, 02:49:54 PM »

Quote from: Ladislaus

What would you get, about 300 Rosaries in a year?

What an assinine, pompous comment. Here in Brazil the resistence has been praying 3 rosaries a day, (granted that in Portuguese 5 decades is only a third terço and a rosario is only considered 15 mysteries). Then here you come with your pessimist little comment. The height of ignorance.

Ladislaus · « **Reply #224 on:** October 31, 2014, 02:53:32 PM »

Quote from: Centroamerica

Quote from: Ladislaus
What would you get, about 300 Rosaries in a year?

What an assinine, pompous comment. Here in Brazil the resistence has been praying 3 rosaries a day, (granted that in Portuguese 5 decades is only a third terço and a rosario is only considered 15 mysteries). Then here you come with your pessimist little comment. The height of ignorance.

And you are both bitter and intellectually-challenged. Obviously this was hyperbole, to illustrate the point that the numbers in the SSPX eclipse those of the Resistance.