Author Topic: Eleison comments 380 October 25, 2014 (Read 40789 times)

Adolphus · « **Reply #20 on:** October 25, 2014, 06:43:00 PM »

Quote from: holysoulsacademy

And now we are supposed to contemplate Visions from Our Lady that basically put her seal of approval on Bp. Fellay's Rosary Crusade for the freeing up of the Mass as resulting in Summorum Pontificuм!

Exactly! And I consider this extremely dangerous, since I have noticed that some members of the so-called resistance still think Summorum pontificuм was something good…

Charlotte NC Bill · « **Reply #21 on:** October 25, 2014, 08:43:42 PM »

I must admit: For the life of me I can't imagine Bp. Fellay being Heaven's chosen vehicle for any holy endeavor. He's certainly good at picking Zionist money-men like Max Krah as business partners. He's really good at hiding the truth and hiding from the truth. He' particularly good at expelling ( or driving out ) holy priests incl. one bishop. Crusading? That calls for militancy and a disdain for compromise. I don't see those traits in Bp. Fellay and I don't believe Bps. Williamson, DeMallerais or Galleretta do either.

Maria Auxiliadora · « **Reply #22 on:** October 25, 2014, 09:31:15 PM »

Quote from: curioustrad

Quote from: bernadette
Bishop Williamson must be short of things to do...

And that is the curious thing (because he shouldn't be): These "revelations" speak of an English prelate who is unknown and without power who will bring these messages to fulfillment. Yet, if +W is this "prelate" why does he always refuse the mantle of leading the resistance ?

Where did you get this information? As far as I know there is nothing of the sort in the messages. Can you provide your source? Or are you making it up for some reason? Please explain.

curioustrad · « **Reply #23 on:** October 25, 2014, 10:10:20 PM »

Quote from: Marie Auxiliadora

Quote from: curioustrad
Quote from: bernadette
Bishop Williamson must be short of things to do...

And that is the curious thing (because he shouldn't be): These "revelations" speak of an English prelate who is unknown and without power who will bring these messages to fulfillment. Yet, if +W is this "prelate" why does he always refuse the mantle of leading the resistance ?

Where did you get this information? As far as I know there is nothing of the sort in the messages. Can you provide your source? Or are you making it up for some reason? Please explain.

Don't you know by now I don't make things up ? I quote sources and prove them - the way of the church herself in her dogma manuals etc. It was in the other thread on part 1 of these messages - I'm too exhausted to carry on tonight so you can read it for yourself at a source it was read and approved by Bishop Williamson himself.

ultrarigorist · « **Reply #24 on:** October 25, 2014, 10:19:15 PM »

Quote from: Charlotte NC Bill

I must admit: For the life of me I can't imagine Bp. Fellay being Heaven's chosen vehicle for any holy endeavor. He's certainly good at picking Zionist money-men like Max Krah as business partners. He's really good at hiding the truth and hiding from the truth. He' particularly good at expelling ( or driving out ) holy priests incl. one bishop. Crusading? That calls for militancy and a disdain for compromise. I don't see those traits in Bp. Fellay and I don't believe Bps. Williamson, DeMallerais or Galleretta do either.

The seer wasn't privy to +Fellay's fiscal arrangements when the ~~delusions~~ visions began.

Or should I continue to say Secret Seer, or will that tidbit get published in part III?