On 14th of June, Viganò has written another short letter, published on Blog: Chiesa e post concilio. Viganò repeats the idea that it's better to ditch the whole robber council instead of removing single heretical propositions (proposizioni eretiche o che favoriscono l’eresia).
Prof. Enrico Maria Radaelli, a disciple of Romano Amerio, has commented on that letter (blog-post Comment of 15 giugno 2020 19:14). He calls Viganò "the first of all bishops to take the right position" and "more useful than Lefebvre".
What a grotesque assertion!
A Johnny-come-lately (with all due respect your Excellency) whose conversion is yet to be established, his position more useful than the great Archbishop who almost single-handedly stood uncompromisingly against the modernist onslaught and preserved for us the Catholic Faith and Liturgy in all its purity and exposed the cunning of the modernists at every turn, not 50 years later but as it it happened, from day one of the Council... what an absurdity. Such a comment is diabolical and it should sicken all Traditional Catholics of whatever persuasion.
A few brief reminders of Archbishop Lefebvre's teaching taken from Ecclesia Militans:
Here are a few quotes of the Archbishop regarding the Council:
“It is certain that with the 250 conciliar fathers of the Coetus we tried with all the means put at our disposal to keep the liberal errors from being expressed in the texts of the Council. this meant that we were able all the same to limit the damage, to change these inexact or tendentious assertions, to add that sentence to rectify a tendentious proposition, an ambiguous expression. “But I have to admit that we did not succeed in purifying the Council of the liberal and modernist spirit that impregnated most of the schemas. Their drafters indeed were precisely the experts and the Fathers tainted with this spirit. Now, what can you do when a docuмent is in all its parts drawn up with a false meaning? It is practically impossible to expurgate it of that meaning. It would have to be completely recomposed in order to be given a Catholic spirit.”(Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, “They Have Uncrowned Him”, Angelus Press, English Edition, 1988, quote is contained in the Chapter called “The Robber Council of Vatican II”, Emphasis Mine) “I do not hesitate to affirm that the Council brought to reality the conversion of the Church to the world. I leave it to you to reflect who the moving spirit of this spirituality was: it is enough for you to remember the one whom Our Lord Jesus Christ calls the Prince of this World.”(Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, “They Have Uncrowned Him”, Angelus Press, English Edition, 1988, quote is contained in the Chapter called “A Pacifist Council”, Emphasis Mine) “This fight between the Church and the liberals and modernism is the fight over Vatican II. It is as simple of that. And the consequences are far-reaching. “The more one analyzes the docuмents of Vatican II, and the more one analyzes their interpretation by the authorities of the Church, the more one realizes that what is at stake is not merely superficial errors, a few mistakes, ecuмenism, religious liberty, collegiality, a certain Liberalism, but rather a wholesale perversion of the mind, a whole new philosophy based on modern philosophy, on subjectivism.” (Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, “Two Years after the Consecrations”, Address Given to Priests in Econe, Switzerland on September 6, 1990, Emphasis Mine)
Topic: Bishop Athanasius Schneider: 'Vatican II is Salvageable' (Read 5231 times)