Author Topic: ELEISON 379 - OCTOBER 18, 2014 (Read 52941 times)

Adolphus · « **Reply #25 on:** October 20, 2014, 03:28:16 PM »

Quote from: Elsa Zardini

Adolfito, How about doing your homework? That’s a different seer. And, you say “I would not trust a "seer" who attended the Novus Ordo Missae”. Can a mexican (you) who has never attended Resistance Masses offered by Resistant Fathers in Mexico be trusted? Or, is that ok for ashke…nαzιs ? Just saying...

Elsa,

First of all, I would like you to behave as a mature person and stop referring to me using diminutive names.

Secondly, whether or not I have pending homework is a personal business, and as such, there is no reason to be ventilated in a public forum.

Now, regarding your last question, I must say that I only attend Catholic masses. There is no such thing as resistance masses.

Now, if what you mean by resistance masses is Catholic masses celebrated by priests who do not agree with Bp. Fellay's directives, then I could say that I do attend to such masses when I can. Not in Mexico, since I am not in Mexico, though.

Pete Vere · « **Reply #26 on:** October 20, 2014, 05:19:53 PM »

Quote from: curioustrad

"Appararition-ism" has always been a good way to explain what the apparent events cannot.

Along with Garabandal why is Bishop Williamson always falling for false apparitions ?

It allows him an alternate answer to the types of question that otherwise would likely lead to drawing sedevacantist conclusions.

curioustrad · « **Reply #27 on:** October 20, 2014, 06:07:11 PM »

Quote from: Pete Vere

Quote from: curioustrad
"Appararition-ism" has always been a good way to explain what the apparent events cannot.

Along with Garabandal why is Bishop Williamson always falling for false apparitions ?

It allows him an alternate answer to the types of question that otherwise would likely lead to drawing sedevacantist conclusions.

Yes that is almost certainly the reason since as he said:

Quote

If Mary tells us how to save the Church,
All other means will leave us in the lurch.

It occurred to me last night that I had asked the Bishop some time ago about these "apparitions" and "revelations" and he told me then that he had been in favor and then against these apparitions together with his specific reasons why and why not.

The Bishop communicated them to me via e-mail so I have my question and his answer on file. I will be very interested to hear why he has changed his mind yet again.

Of course I am not going to pre-empt his next few EC installments but if necessary I will publish the communications to show the evolution in his own thought process for the record. Surprisingly the reasons he is now giving in favor, he gave against to me 2 years ago.

ultrarigorist · « **Reply #28 on:** October 20, 2014, 06:34:14 PM »

Quote from: curioustrad

Surprisingly the reasons he is now giving in favor, he gave against to me 2 years ago.

It's very unsettling that H.E. threw caution to the wind regarding these "apparitions", especially this one. The next few EC emails are sure to be anti-climatic, just a rerun of Dawn Marie's wavering ideas about "what would Our Blessed Mother Do". We all know the sick routine by now.

I'd like to read your correspondence after the EC comments have been published.

Charlotte NC Bill · « **Reply #29 on:** October 20, 2014, 08:14:58 PM »

This woman said she had an apparition experience. Whether anyone believes it or not is up to them...If someone I respect ( Williamson ) tells he believes her then that definitely moves me to examine it/her. But how is he spreading falsehoods? She certainly seems to believe herself. So you're free to believe her or not. We all KNOW that praying the Rosary for the Consecration is something Our Blessed Mother wants. So it's not a stretch to believe.....again, how does that opinion constitute "spreading falsehoods"? If you can't contain your contempt for a holy bishop then shut up. Don't you have some buttons that need to be re-sewn onto your kids' jacket or something? I mean can't some of you people find something remotely edifying to do/say/contribute?