Author Topic: ELEISON 379 - OCTOBER 18, 2014 (Read 50959 times)

1st Mansion Tenant · « **Reply #15 on:** October 20, 2014, 12:30:17 AM »

Was there some rule made after the apparitions at Fatima that there could never be any more authentic apparitions again? I understand the need to be cautious, and I have not followed any of the supposed seers such as Garabandal or Medjugorge, but is it not possible that there could be a true apparition in or times? And how can we be so quick to judge it's authenticity without obvious proof one way or the other?

Adolphus · « **Reply #16 on:** October 20, 2014, 12:51:51 AM »

Quote from: 1st Mansion Tenant

Was there some rule made after the apparitions at Fatima that there could never be any more authentic apparitions again? I understand the need to be cautious, and I have not followed any of the supposed seers such as Garabandal or Medjugorge, but is it not possible that there could be a true apparition in or times? And how can we be so quick to judge it's authenticity without obvious proof one way or the other?

I would not trust a "seer" who attended the Novus Ordo Missae, even after having received revelations...

ultrarigorist · « **Reply #17 on:** October 20, 2014, 06:20:35 AM »

Quote from: 1st Mansion Tenant

Was there some rule made after the apparitions at Fatima that there could never be any more authentic apparitions again? I understand the need to be cautious, and I have not followed any of the supposed seers such as Garabandal or Medjugorge, but is it not possible that there could be a true apparition in or times? And how can we be so quick to judge it's authenticity without obvious proof one way or the other?

We can be quick to judgment when the "seer" had a history of obliquely trumpeting her "locutions" on the net; and then going quiet after learned she would be published.

Adolphus · « **Reply #18 on:** October 20, 2014, 10:05:25 AM »

Quote from: Marie Auxiliadora

Quote from: Adolphus
Quote from: Ekim
By that logic, why does Our Lady need Rosaries at all? By + Burke? +Fellay? +Ratzinger?

The reason, perhaps, that she chose a bishop from the SSPX was to use tradition as the means to her end. Or maybe, just maybe, she got tired of waiting 80+ years for a Novus Ordo prelate that she thought a traditional bishop might actually get the job done? Who are we to question the mother of God?

To question the Mother of God?…

Did She really give such messages? How could we know so? What else has She reveled?

As H.E. said: “Stay tuned”!

What for? To read this?

I don't think His Excellency is going to quote Fr. Grossin's opinion nor in which conditions Fathers Ortiz and Jely found the "seer".

Cristera · « **Reply #19 on:** October 20, 2014, 11:32:32 AM »

Quote from: Adolphus

Quote from: Marie Auxiliadora
Quote from: Adolphus
Quote from: Ekim
By that logic, why does Our Lady need Rosaries at all? By + Burke? +Fellay? +Ratzinger?

The reason, perhaps, that she chose a bishop from the SSPX was to use tradition as the means to her end. Or maybe, just maybe, she got tired of waiting 80+ years for a Novus Ordo prelate that she thought a traditional bishop might actually get the job done? Who are we to question the mother of God?

To question the Mother of God?…

Did She really give such messages? How could we know so? What else has She reveled?

As H.E. said: “Stay tuned”!

What for? To read this?

I don't think His Excellency is going to quote Fr. Grossin's opinion nor in which conditions Fathers Ortiz and Jely found the "seer".

Mr. Adolphus: If you think Bp. Williamson is talking about Mme. Rossiniere, you are very wrong. Get informed before inoculate your poison.