Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Eastern Orthodox Monk and vlogger converts to Catholic Resistance  (Read 1106 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Eastern Orthodox Monk and vlogger converts to Catholic Resistance
« Reply #20 on: August 14, 2026, 04:34:03 PM »
Protestants reject multiple heresies and they can still be saved.  Praise Allah that JP2 (the Koran Kisser) told us so!

Yeah, Nishant is a walking blustering open sore oozing puss of contradiction.

I called him out before to obey his leader because Bergs told him to stop proselytizing and that he needs to respect our faith tradition and stop insulting, attacking, and smearing us.

Bergs also tells him that all faiths are paths to God, including the Shiva-Vishu crapola that Pishant comes from.

Offline Meg

Re: Eastern Orthodox Monk and vlogger converts to Catholic Resistance
« Reply #21 on: August 14, 2026, 04:35:22 PM »
Well, yes... A non-catholic can be a Catholic. Don't you find this logic funny?

It's very JP2, who of course believed strongly in universal salvation.


Offline Pax Vobis

  • Supporter
Re: Eastern Orthodox Monk and vlogger converts to Catholic Resistance
« Reply #22 on: August 14, 2026, 04:37:12 PM »
How many Trad heretics have you known to possess supernatural faith, hope and charity, and hence to be in the state of grace.  
Gaudium et Spes (Pastoral Constitution on the Church in the Modern World):
Paragraph 22 asserts that the Holy Spirit offers to all people the possibility of being made partners in Christ's paschal mystery in a way known to God.

V2 says that God’s grace can operate outside the formal boundaries of the Church to save those responding sincerely to the light they have been given.

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Eastern Orthodox Monk and vlogger converts to Catholic Resistance
« Reply #23 on: August 14, 2026, 04:40:20 PM »
I've never met a Sede who wasn't also a heretic.  Here's one reason.

In the Creed, we profess to believe in the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church.

Methinks you forgot about the Holy part, and even the One, where the Conciliar Anti-Church is anything but holy, where only those who are even slightly orthodox get punished, such as Strickland, whereas every pervert, sodomite, and heretic gets appointed, and promoted in this wicked Anti-Church.  When only the good is punished, and all manner of evil is tolerated, that is the Church of Satan.  As for the One ... when 90% of your great Anti-Church are heretics by their own polls, denying one dogma or another, there's no One-ness of faith anywhere to be seen.  As for Apostolic, Prevost isn't even a valid priest, much less a valid bishop.  Get lost, Nishant.



That third frame is your Anti-Church, you blasphemere, you.  Father Amorth said that when he had asked Padre Pio in about 1960 what the Third Secrete was about, wondering whether it was about physical chastisements, Padre Pio emphatically denied it, and he said it was about how Satan would soon come to rule an Anti-Church.

https://onepeterfive.com/chief-exorcist-father-amorth-padre-pio-knew-the-third-secret/



Offline Pax Vobis

  • Supporter
Re: Eastern Orthodox Monk and vlogger converts to Catholic Resistance
« Reply #24 on: August 14, 2026, 04:45:49 PM »
Heresy is directly against the infallibility of the Church teaching and indirectly against the dogma defined.  If a person denies a dogma without knowing it has been infallibly defined by the Church, they are not guilty of heresy.  They would be in material heresy only. 

Those who were raised in a Protestant sect and are invincibly ignorant that the Catholic Church is the true Church, are usually in material heresy only.
 Since material heresy is not incompatible with the virtue of faith, it is not a direct obstacle to salvation.

John Paul II already answered for kissing the Koran, just as you will soon answer for having publicly defected from the Catholic Church, outside of which there is no salvation

Pax, you are one heartbeat away from an eternity of suffering that you cannot even imagine.
I do not, and have never, intended to defect from the Church, of whom I will always be a member.  I remain a member because canon law does not recognize defections as legit, from those who do not intend to defect.  At worst, i'm a material heretic, for I do not intend to deny any dogmas, nor do I formally.

You haven't explained the denial, you've just hurled uncharitable accusations, which is not consistent with V2's treatment of those "not in full communion" because V2 said to treat me (and others) in this way -- 


Recognize Brothers "The Catholics segregate themselves with love for their separated brethren with a charity that desires and works actively to overcome in truth whatever divides them" (Unitatis Redintegratio #3)

** Honor common bonds:** Those who believe in Christ and have been properly baptized are "put in some, though imperfect, communion with the Catholic Church" (Lumen Gentium #15).

Listen and learn: "The style and method of the Catholic expression should in no way be used as a barrier to dialogue. It is, of course, essential that the doctrine be clearly presented in its entirety. Nothing is so foreign to the spirit of ecuмenism as a false irenicism [compromise] in which the purity of Catholic doctrine suffers injury" (Unitatis Redintegratio #11).

Value elements of truth: "The written word of God; the life of grace; faith, hope and charity, with the other interior gifts of the Holy Spirit... can exist outside the visible boundaries of the Catholic Church" (Unitatis Redintegratio #3