DONACHIE: There will be voices that will cry out "gravity, oh gravity, universal gravitation and inertia, and relativity make heliocentrism scientifically valid," but these cries are for delusional dreamers. Gravity is by far the weakest of forces. It is weaker than the littlest refrigerator magnet or tiny kitten. In fact, it is so weak that it is not a force of any significant practical measure in real physics.
Gravity is not a lateral force at all, and, since the Earth is a sphere, it is not even a vertical force either. In fact, gravity is not a force at all. It is merely a coextensive attribute of being. It is merely a coextensive attribute of things that are around the cosmos and around the Earth in quale quid. And relativity is utter nonsense, and without Newton's gravity and Einstein's relativity, heliocentrism is all out of luck.
Newton had "F" and "G," and Einstein had "E" and "C," and the truth is they were both wrong. The simple fact is that the Sun and the Moon orbit the Earth, and the Earth is not revolving.
George Berkeley, an 18th century British philosopher, observed, “esse est percipi vel percipere,” “to be is perceived or perceiving.” If the Earth were really rotating and orbiting the sun, spinning and spinning, flying through space, why is it that it is never perceived? How can that be when no one ever perceives it at all?
What I love about this is that it brings home what our ET author has been saying: Movement is sensible. The report of the senses is necessary for the apprehension of material reality. The religion of contradiction requires the suspension of both common sense and the report of the five senses. We are to believe fiction rather than the powers and faculties endowed on human nature.
In the wilderness of modern life today, with so many horrendous lies and abuses from the ʝʊdɛօ-Masonic NWO, keen perception would be like gold, “Perceptio aurum.” Modern people and animals would live and die by their wits. In the wild or in the city, they live and die by what they perceive and do. The most acute perceptions can sense many things, but never that the Earth is wheeling around in space, making gigantic numbers in time like some strange bats out of hidden NASA caves and secrets in Nevada, the “Federal” Reserve, and Wall Street.
If a golf course and a small local airport lost their radial Earth-flight velocity in gradual steps of 40 mph, at what point could people start to tell what was going on?
Augusta National at 33”30’ N and at 865 mph daily spin, could lose all of its angular velocity in a day like that, if it only lost 36 mph to an hour. At 36 x 24 = 864, Augusta, Georgia would have only 1 mph left to spare at the end of the day.
On such a day as that, over a 4 ½ hour round of golf, a foursome out on the course, and sometimes in the pines and in the water, could lose 144 mph of the terrestrial momentum from the rotation for their latitude, and nobody would notice? If they came back later the next day, the golf course and the local airport would not be moving.
It would be “The Day the Earth Stood Still” out there, unless they were skidding through space at 66,600 mph and the 5 other speeds, without their rotation that they had lost, and what would that seem like? Presumably they could not notice the skidding and bumping and crashing through space of the Earth then, without its spinning around, anymore than they could not notice any of it before, with all the counter-clockwise spinning. One could guess it would seem like it always had before, before they lost the spin, since it never seemed like the Earth was really moving or rotating at all in the first place.
If the Earth did not lose its spin and some perceptive people went on a vacation and played golf at the Shaughnessy Heights Golf Club in Vancouver British Columbia at 49”13’27 N, therefore with 677.6469766684105 mph daily radial velocity, and then they went to El Condado Golf and Tennis Club in Quito, Ecuador, at the Equator, therefore with 1038 mph daily radial velocity, would they not notice the difference in playing conditions between these courses?
If Quito lost half its motor one day, would nobody notice? A 519 mph drop? That would be to the tune of the 60th parallel and Helsinki, Finland. Strange days around the Earth indeed either way.
If they went to Tromso Golf Park at Breivikeidet near Tromso, Norway, at latitude 69”39’30 N, therefore with 360.6822404339137 mph daily radial velocity, and then to The Billy Joss Golf Club in Ulukhaktok, in Canada’s Northwest Territories, set in tundra off the Amundsen Gulf in the Beaufort Sea at latitude 70”44’11 N, therefore with 342.314214650617 mph daily radial velocity, would they not begin to notice the different ways the Earth was supposedly turning in different places. How could it not be a part of the way the game was being played?
Going to the 75th parallel of the Arctic Circle, only shag bags and no golf course in the wilderness, it would be a 769 mph drop from El Condado in Quito.
What they might notice one day is that, in terms of Earth spins, everywhere they go it actually seems like the North and South pole and “The Day the Earth Stood Still,” because the North and South poles are at 90” N and 90” S, respectively, and, therefore, have a cosine value of (0), which should mean they are not spinning, since the Earth supposedly does not spin all at one speed but according to parallels. From a 90” angle from the Equator and cosine value of (0), they are in place with a (0) mph spin, which is no spinning action. It would be like the poles are not rotating but held stationary in space. Unless (0) mph is in motion, they are not revolving; and (0) mph is not in motion. Could anybody wait at the starting line of a Formula One Race better than at (0) mph?
When people have been misled into believing in heliocentrism and that the Earth orbits the sun, they have imagined that its motion is undetectable and, therefore, that it is also “slow.” They have dreamed that the Earth is turning and moving slowly in space, so slowly that they do not notice it revolving from day to changing day.
As the old gyroscope huckster himself, Foucault, wrote in the “Journal de Debats,” on March 31, 1851, that the “slowness” of the “movement of the Earth” … “requires us to turn to well-developed methods” for recognition of it. (1)p.156 But this is not really reasonable. In view of the magnitude of the cosmos, if the Earth were moving round and round in it to account for the passing of day and night, and the seasons and the years, it would necessarily have to be moving at an enormous astronomical rate, incredibly fast and immediate to all locations on Earth, which obviously it is not. The supposed motion of the Earth is not immediate nor detectable, which makes it seem so incredibly slow, as if it is not in occurrence.
As Ptolemy wisely had said so long before, if the Earth were orbiting the sun, it would have a massive circuit to keep, and it would have a massive astronomical velocity greater than that of all the other motions taking place across it, since it would have to be making so great a circuit in so short a time. Thus the bodies which are not at rest on it would always appear to have motions much less and contrary to its own, and all motions on Earth would be surpassed and left behind by the Earth’s greater weight and momentum. All animals and loose objects, therefore, like leaves and Dandelion seed heads, butterflies, birds, squirrels, and arrows, etc. would fail to go eastward without great difficulty, because the Earth would be spinning away from underneath them, tremendously. They would forever be falling behind the Earth’s overwhelming flight into the Eastern sky. After the exhaustion of so much torque and so many days of heliocentric madness, all would tend to fall back to the West. Even the buildings and trees would become worn out from it after some time and fall back to the West due to the erosive effects of occidental dilapidation.
For an illustration of the problems of heliocentrism, if someone had a globe of the Earth in his library that was a little more than a yard in circuмference, and he made an honest bet of one million dollars that no one could spin it in scale as fast as the Earth is supposedly spinning around the sun, how could he lose the bet?
All the losers believing in the heresy of heliocentrism would have to try to spin it and spin it fast. They may not realize how fast they would have to spin it to spin it in scale and make it spin like the Earth. It would be at least 474 times around per second. Who could make it spin around completely 474 times per second to keep it modeled in scale?
No one and nobody. There is not even a machine that could make a globe of one yard circuмference spin around completely 474 times a second. A
quadrigenti-septuaquattuorgesimatrix of a second, I/ CDLXXIV, a one to 474th second rate. This could also remind people how correct old Aristotle was to say that natural movement cannot take place in an instant, and that the Earth is not moving and does not orbit the sun.
However, a wiser fellow who knows Aristotle, Plato, Ptolemy and the Bible may win the bet by not spinning it at all. Spin it at 0 mph, like the North and South pole, and it will come out spinning as fast and in scale as the Earth.
If there are any doubts that the Earth is not moving and, therefore, is not orbiting the sun, just place an interferometer under the center of any working Foucault pendulum. If the Earth were moving, the results would not be the same, and if the Earth were flying in space making time to orbit the sun, it would drive all the golfers and the birds insane. It would derange everything. It would be hopeless, woeful, and utter confusion.
TAKE NOTE!!! They did move the Earth in the minds of men. In the minds of men, the Earth is spinning and hurtling through random space. TAKE NOTE that this earthmoving has caused untold corrosive effects in the psychological, social, political, cultural, and religious spheres of human activity. Due to belief in the operation of error, men are become "insane, deranged, hopeless, woeful, and utterly confused."
It would destroy all the butterflies and the trees. If the Earth were flying around like heliocentrism requires, it would destroy all the delicate trees first and then destroy the stronger ones. There are pines and
spruce, olive and nutmeg trees, junipers and oaks that are hundreds and sometimes thousands of years old. They could never survive so long under the cosmic strain created by the Earth having to orbit the sun.
It would put everything out of order.
TAKE NOTE!!! Modernity is best defined as the utter destruction of the arch orders of Nature and Grace!
Birds leaving their nests in the morning would not be able to find them in the evening. A condor over the Andes would find himself lost over the Pacific Ocean in no time. Hunting rabbits would become too much to do for hawks, eagles, and falcons. The birds could not build nests in the trees wheeling around, if they were not coming apart. To barely get by would become impossible, and the dragonflies and little creatures of the forest would go extinct as well. It would be a disaster. They would all go extinct, having been wiped out long ago, under the careening stresses of a mixed-up heliocentric universe.
Death where is thy sting?
It is unscientific, and mathematically, logically, and physically impossible for the Earth to be orbiting the sun without flying apart all whithers like a flock of scared birds. It has been beyond passing a little bit of strangeways and strange brew to believe that the Earth orbits the sun, and all the time, wherever you go, there you are, and the Earth is always the most massive thing closest to home, and it always seems at ease … like it is not in motion, like it is at rest. If they said all the numbers were different tomorrow, what difference could it make? It always seems like the terra firma is at rest anyway. And through all this?