Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Dominicans of Avrille Newsletter, September 2025  (Read 1331 times)

0 Members and 8 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Matthew

  • Mod
  • *****
  • Posts: 33298
  • Reputation: +29587/-612
  • Gender: Male
Re: Dominicans of Avrille Newsletter, September 2025
« Reply #15 on: Today at 04:27:18 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Regarding promoting "the vaccine": I think TGK might mean by this that they gave permission for the faithful to take it.
    That is clearly not promoting it, and the Benedictines and most of the Resistance clergy took the same position on the morality of receiving the jab if you needed to keep your job or if you were convinced that it was for the good of your health etc.
    There were a few conservative churchmen who considered it gravely immoral, and I clearly recall Bishop Williamson said in one of his sermons "and I think they're right, I think they're right", however he didn't say it in a definitive dogmatic fashion, there was uncertainty even with him and I don't know what advice he gave to individuals who approached him.
    It is false to say the Dominicans "promoted" the jab, and a private email is not promoting something... you would certainly lose your job as a promotion company if that were your approach. No doubt that private email contains a permission rather than a promotion.

    Yes, consider the source. People said the same thing about Bp Williamson and the New Mass, and we all know the truth about that.

    Giving private permission in one specific case does NOT constitute "promotion" or "open permission for all" to do the same.

    Priests who do their job, who take morality seriously, who distinguish between dogma and non-dogma, are penalized in the court of public opinion, because their actions and words aren't "black and white" enough.
    Priests who are careful to stay within the lines of truth are easier to lie about on Social Media, because you can use HALF TRUTHS, DISTORTIONS, and EXAGGERATIONS in addition to good-old LIES in your campaigns against them.

    If one's position and actions must be reduced to CAVEMAN SPEECH in order for you to be happy, then

    TOO BAD

    Grow some more brain cells. The handful you have are getting pretty lonely.
    Want to say "thank you"? 
    You can send me a gift from my Amazon wishlist!
    https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

    My accounts (Paypal, Venmo) have been (((shut down))) PM me for how to donate and keep the forum going.

    Offline Matthew

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 33298
    • Reputation: +29587/-612
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Dominicans of Avrille Newsletter, September 2025
    « Reply #16 on: Today at 04:31:15 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • There's actually a channel on youtube where everything is explained with cartoons, in terms of monkeys and bananas. That's what modern minds require these days!

    Isn't it pathetic that there's so much demand from the public, now, to "explain things to me like I was 5".

    WHY? Are you 5? Didn't you graduate High School, and go to a 4-year college? Is this what the world has come to?

    They want everything translated into the most simplistic terms, as in classic "cavemen speech".
    Needless to say, Caveman speech doesn't allow for much complexity, distinctions, or nuance.
    Want to say "thank you"? 
    You can send me a gift from my Amazon wishlist!
    https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

    My accounts (Paypal, Venmo) have been (((shut down))) PM me for how to donate and keep the forum going.


    Offline AnthonyPadua

    • Supporter
    • ****
    • Posts: 2632
    • Reputation: +1341/-288
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Dominicans of Avrille Newsletter, September 2025
    « Reply #17 on: Today at 04:55:29 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Incidentally -- regarding the two accusations, one of them is probably a nothingburger anyway.

    The "attending SSPX Masses" is a red herring. There is nothing to be ashamed of for holding the "yellow light" position.

    We're not Hewko cultists, nor Pfeifferites. We don't promote the Red Light position around here. That is a convenient position for priests who want jurisdiction and control over more territory than they can possibly serve. So they have to come up with doctrine(s) to keep their "Faithful" in the wings, waiting on these priests to show up once or twice a year, NOT moving on to other chapels or priests in the meantime.

    We have to be rational and reasonable about the SSPX. They have valid priests. They are not all part of a Borg-style hive mind collective. Yes, the ship has sprung a leak, YES, your local chapel with that conservative priest could be gone at any time, replaced with a "new style" SSPX priest. So you need to be starting your Resistance chapels NOW if you hope to have Mass in 5 or 10 years. But is it sinful to attend most SSPX Masses? Of course not.

    But validity isn't everything. Or else think of all the 100% valid priests who pushed Vatican II and the New Mass on their faithful!
    The SSPX has similarly fallen. They are full of Modernism now. You can be validly ordained, even say the Tridentine Mass, and be HORRIBLY formed and with errors and even Modernism in your brain.

    For those unfamiliar, there are various positions on the SSPX:

    Red Light: 100% of SSPX chapels are evil, as of TODAY, they are sinful to attend, and must be avoided.

    Yellow Light: The SSPX has fallen as an organization. The formation has changed; younger priests aren't even Traditionally formed; there are mostly valid priests, but the organization is no longer fighting Vatican II, etc. In short, the lifeboat has sprung a leak and we must work to find replacements IMMEDIATELY. We can no longer count on the SSPX to be a lifeboat to preserve us through the Crisis, even if there are some intact lifeboats here or there at the moment. It is already a bad idea to attend many of the SSPX chapels. Others are fine FOR NOW, but that could change AT ANY TIME. Do not count on the SSPX as you did 15 years ago.

    Green Light: There is nothing wrong with the SSPX. They are great. Full speed ahead! No need to come up with alternative chapels/options for Mass, etc. No need for any Resistance movement, no need to support the Resistance.

    As much as I reject the Red Light, I equally reject the Green Light position. There is clearly a problem with the SSPX. The ship has certainly sprung a leak. The remaining "good priests" are on borrowed time. Not only will they not live forever, they also have bosses who can censure them, control them, and move them. And even before DEATH, there are things like disability, retirement, transfer, etc. The younger you are, the more you should be concerned. Actually -- the younger THE YOUNGEST MEMBER OF YOUR FAMILY IS, the more you should be concerned. If you have children, they have a LONG WAY TO GO. They will outlive ALL of your favorite "classic" or "old school" SSPX priests. The SSPX isn't forming priests like that anymore. PERIOD. You need to plan for your future. Be the ant, not the grasshopper.
    Yeah this is worry to me, the SSPX is the only chapel available to me, there is literally 0 other options for me bar a greek+Ukrainian catholic church, both my priests are old and 1 is already in bad health. So I do wonder what will happen when 1 of them finally dies and get replaced.

    Online JacquesCathelineau

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 3
    • Reputation: +1/-0
    Re: Dominicans of Avrille Newsletter, September 2025
    « Reply #18 on: Today at 08:22:34 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Yes, consider the source. People said the same thing about Bp Williamson and the New Mass, and we all know the truth about that.

    Giving private permission in one specific case does NOT constitute "promotion" or "open permission for all" to do the same.

    Priests who do their job, who take morality seriously, who distinguish between dogma and non-dogma, are penalized in the court of public opinion, because their actions and words aren't "black and white" enough.
    Priests who are careful to stay within the lines of truth are easier to lie about on Social Media, because you can use HALF TRUTHS, DISTORTIONS, and EXAGGERATIONS in addition to good-old LIES in your campaigns against them.

    If one's position and actions must be reduced to CAVEMAN SPEECH in order for you to be happy, then

    TOO BAD

    Grow some more brain cells. The handful you have are getting pretty lonely.
    Matthew, to be fair it was more than once.

      -“Bishop Williamson: There are a number of decent priests still operating as decent priests inside the Novus Ordo… if you look somewhere in your area within reach of your car’s petrol tank, your gasoline tank, you will find, somewhere, you will find a decent Novus Ordo priest. … I believe there are some who do understand it and who still want to practice as good priests. Now, they’re  forced to celebrate the New Mass. …Interviewer: People who go to those
    [Novus Ordo] Masses, in the vast majority of cases, are of a liberal mindset, they go into the church and come out and answer a survey saying: abortion is acceptable in some circuмstances, ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity is acceptable, this is acceptable. You, your excellency, are asking me, in this heresy, in this just absolute cesspool of heresy, to try to maybe find some priest which I don’t even think exists, to hear my confession. But to me it is so obvious that this whole thing is fake! How can I participate in it? It’s fake! This has nothing to do with Vatican I, it has nothing to do with the teachings of Pius X, it’s got nothing to do with Pius IX, it has nothing to do with Thomism. It’s Protestantism and Communism. So how can I even approach this as an honest Catholic?Bishop Williamson: OK, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, I understand where you’re coming from. I only say, I think there’s a little more white around you and available if you look for it than you believe. … but don’t believe that you’re up against a world in which everything is either black or, well I’m sorry, in which all of the grey is all black. No, if it’s grey, then there’s some white mixed in with the black. It’s your business to sort out the white from the black, to frequent the white as you say, not to frequent the black, not to go along with the black, not to go along with this fake religion as you quite rightly say. The new religion of Vatican II is a fake religion, no question about it, and it’s at war with the true religion. I’m obviously not saying go along with the new religion. What I’m saying is: I do believe in the terrible mixture of grey and black that exists, in this vale of tears, that’s almost everywhere in this vale of tears … Now you say that the Novus Ordo is all completely gone and rotten. I understand and you can’t afford to eat a half-poisoned cake. I understand. But if the cake is half-poisoned then there’s half of it that isn’t poisoned. And if you’re using your mind a point comes when you can begin to distinguish what is poisoned and what isn’t. So when you come to applying - the principles are absolute but their application is - the principles are in black and white, no mixture, but the application is in a world of greys, so when it comes to applying the principles you’ve got to - [talks about Novus Ordo miracles] . . .I’m obviously not pushing the new religion. What I'm saying is that there is still part valid in the new religion along side all that is fake. I may well admit readily that in many cases there’s much more fake than there still is validity. That’s not the question. The question is what you should do where you are. And have you got to stay away from every anything that’s got anything to do with the Novus Ordo. My answer to that absolute question is: no. You don’t have to stay absolutely away. I’m not saying follow the new religion. I’m saying you’re young and you’re strong, you can drive around the diocese. That SSPX priest probably knows some conservative priest in the area, probably. Ask him.”  (Youtube interview, 4th August, 2022)[/list]


      -“There are cases where even the Novus Ordo Mass can be attended with an effect of building one’s Faith instead of losing it. … Be very careful with the Novus Ordo … But, exceptionally, if you’re watching and praying, even there you may find the grace of God. If you do, make use of it in order to sanctify your soul.”  (Mahopac, New York, 28th June 2015)
      -“I do not say that every person should stay away from every single Novus Ordo Mass.”  (Ibid.)
      -“I don’t say to everybody inside the Novus Ordo, priests and laity, I don’t say: ‘You’ve got to get out!'" (St. Catharine’s, Ontario, 5th November 2014)
      -“The Novus Ordo is false, but it’s not only false, it’s part true part false. The false part is very dangerous, but the true part enables souls to keep the Faith.”  (Veneta Oregon, 19th September, 2016)
      -“Therefore, it seems to me, if James is convinced that to save his soul he must stay in the Newchurch, I need not hammer him to get out of it.”  (Eleison Comments #348)
      -“As an essential part of the subjective and ambiguous religion, the Novus Ordo Mass can be what you make of it. A priest can celebrate it decently, a Catholic can attend it devoutly.”  (Eleison Comments#447)
      -“Question: Then, does it mean that those knowing what they know, such as the souls here could go to that
    [Novus Ordo Mass] and expect to receive grace?[/list]
      -Bishop Williamson: If anybody here who knows what the Novus Ordo means went back to the Novus Ordo - pffff! - then
    [pause] - why would they want to go back?[laughter] Well, it’s, I would - they can receive grace. But they have to judge the priest…”  (Emmett, Kansas, 18th September, 2016)[/list]
      -“I’m sure you ask yourselves: ‘What kind of word are my children going to have to grow up in? How are they going to keep the Faith?’ Very good questions. By prayer and Charity and by frequenting the sacraments, so long as they are still available, so long as it’s at all still possible to reach the sacraments. And some Novus 
      - I’ve got into quite a lot of controversy for saying this, but it’s true 
      - there is no question that some Novus Ordo Masses are valid. And if they’re valid, then it’s defined by the Council of Trent that grace passes, “ex opere operato” is the strict phrase.”  (Vienna, Virginia, 20th May 2016)