No, if you read the article dispassionately it clearly does agree with the SSPX position.
I think your agenda has gotten the better of your critical thinking skills:
The priest says that 3 of the 4 criteria laid out by the CDF have not been met, and therefore recourse to the vax is gravely illicit.
The SSPX -and quite naturally yourself on their behest- wish to interject different (and fewer) criteria, so as to show them satisfied, and falsely conclude the vax is licit.
Consequently, it is not
the priest who ought to be suspected of deception, but yourself:
If the SSPX is saying they accept the Vatican criteria for the (alleged) liceity of taking abortion jabs, then the criteria which must be met (as specified in the article) are:
-There is no available morally untainted therapeutic intervention that neutralizes the proposed health threat. (Fail)
-There must exist a proportionate cause for using an abortion tainted therapeutic intervention based on the risks involved. (Fail)
-There must exist an actual grave threat to your health or that of others if you were to refrain from taking the proposed abortion tainted therapeutic intervention. (Fail)
-One must oppose the abortion taintedness of the therapeutic intervention.
This nonsense you suggest about leaving aside the 2008 CDF docuмent
Dignitas Personae, in favor of the earlier (and superceded) 2005 PAFL non-magisterial, advisory-only docuмent, as alluded to earlier, is only because the latter (superceded) docuмent is more ambiguous and has fewer criteria, whereas the former is magisterial and specific.
No, I don't think I'll let you escape, broaden, or otherwise disqualify the 2008 criteria.
You can come up with all the non-magisterial, fallacious, sophistic distinctions you desire, but none of them will be able to overcome the 2008 docuмent: You don't get to replace those criteria just because they rebut Menzingen.
The death jabs do not meet the Vatican's criteria (regardless of whether or not they meet yours), and therefore the jab remains today in all cases morally gravely illicit.