.
Thank you for your effort, sspxbvm.
Anyone who is not already familiar with the SSPX crisis and the
many terms Dom Tomas Aquinas uses in this talk, would have a
very hard time understanding what he's saying.
His calm, quiet style is ironically a powerful testimony for the
Resistance, as it's the same message that others promote with
a lot more spark and volume. Therefore, anyone who would
pretend to criticize the Resistance by denouncing the style of
Fr. Pfeiffer, let's say, is only talking about superficialities, rather
than substance.
But you can't really be surprised they would do so, and I'd say
they are not dishonest, because for a liberal, appearances are
everything. The style of a speech is all they tend to consider,
or, at least, it is the thing they primarily consider, as it is the
most obvious aspect.
Minute 36 starts on the topic of priestly ordinations.
Min. 40 Campos and Dom Gerard began to say bad things
AFTER their agreement with Rome, but +F is saying bad things
BEFORE any agreement.
Min. 43 There is an order in the virtues: theological virtues
are above moral virtues. To put moral virtues on top is
ridiculous.
Dom Aquinas says "the face" but he's trying to say "the faith":
Min. 47:17
"Integrity of the face - it can be Catholic; Liberal - is a
contradiction. Many people [lave? live?] in contradiction. So
we must ask Our Lady, not to [live?] in contradiction, but
keep integrity of the face, because is necessary to make
our salvation, and to help our people, and first, for the honor
of Our Lord."