The attempt to paint the Archbishop as some sort of figure longing to be approved by Modernist Rome is beyond the pale. Historically this is false. Not only does it attempt to make the 1974 Declaration and the 1976 Declaration into some sort of oddity, but its attempt to make the 1988 Protocol into the norm is not even logical.
...
He told us that it was the priests around the Archbishop who wanted a deal, not the Archbishop.* He finally gave in to them. The night of the signing of the Protocol bears Fr. Bisig out. He realized that to make such an agreement was wrong, that this new Rome could not be trusted, period. He says so himself. After that, he is absolutely against any agreement with Rome, and in fact, in his last book, "Spiritual Journey" makes this very strong statement:
"It is, therefore, a strict duty for every priest wanting to remain Catholic to separate himself from this Conciliar Church for as long as it does not rediscover the Tradition of the Church and of the Catholic Faith."
It is not a better thing to do, but a strict duty. Has the Conciliar Church returned to Tradition? No, unless you think that congratulatory letters to Buddhists is traditional, to name the latest outrage. You had better look hard for any writing of the Archbishop after the consecrations to discover this supposed true spirit of the Archbishop that you have conjured.
*This is also clear in Bp. Tissier's biography of the Archbishop.
...as long as the Conciliar Church does not rediscover the Tradition of the Church
and of the Catholic Faith!...
So how has B16 dealt with this impossible obstacle?
He has proclaimed first (effectively) that it is possible to deny the principle of
non-contradiction.
Upon that false doctrine, the denial of the principle of non-contradiction, B16 then
goes on to say that all his innovations and all the Modernist nonsense that is being
piled high on the faithful in the tsunami-wake of Vatican II, in the aftermath and
perpetuation of the unclean spirit of Vat.II, IS THIS Tradition. What is new is the
same thing as what was old. That which is handed down to the next generation is
the same thing that was handed down from the Apostles. That which contradicts
the Apostolic Tradition is the same as the Apostolic Tradition. How can he say this
bold-faced LIE and get away with it? Because this is what happens when
BAD PHILOSOPHY goes to work: You get bad doctrine.
The bad doctrine is coming from the Pope, as we stand on the verge of the
"Golden Jubilee" of John XXIII's ABOMINABLE DESOLATION OF THE PAPACY, when
on October 11th, 1962 he formally announced that the Power of the Keys was
being abrogated. How? By no more would the Pope condemn error.
So now, instead of the pope doing what the pope is supposed to do, the pope
is PERPETUATING ERROR, by declaring the "hermeneutic of continuity," the same
thing that Hillel the Jєω did in the generation before Our Lord came to save our
sorry as*es.
For those with eyes to see and ears to hear -- let them know what the spirit says
to the churches.
Of course they won't make the Third Secret of Fatima public. Then everyone
would know that they have been lying to us. The criminals are in control.