Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Does SSPX still believe in TRANSUBSTANSIATION ?  (Read 5218 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline cosmas

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 486
  • Reputation: +277/-141
  • Gender: Male
Does SSPX still believe in TRANSUBSTANSIATION ?
« on: November 12, 2018, 08:36:06 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I know of at least one SSPX chapel where there is a gluten free host given out at communion time to a person or persons. How can they do this if they believe a miracle happens.


    Offline Stanley N

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1208
    • Reputation: +530/-484
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Does SSPX still believe in TRANSUBSTANSIATION ?
    « Reply #1 on: November 12, 2018, 09:02:25 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Are you certain you're talking about gluten free and not low gluten hosts?

    Since the Modern Church doesn't permit "gluten free", I rather doubt any traditional group does either.


    Offline cosmas

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 486
    • Reputation: +277/-141
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Does SSPX still believe in TRANSUBSTANSIATION ?
    « Reply #2 on: November 12, 2018, 09:33:58 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I'll double check that, thankyou !

    Offline cosmas

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 486
    • Reputation: +277/-141
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Does SSPX still believe in TRANSUBSTANSIATION ?
    « Reply #3 on: November 12, 2018, 09:41:40 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • https://www.americamagazine.org/faith/2017/07/11/explainer-what-new-vatican-rules-gluten-free-hosts-mean

    My point is also why does a celiac feel any distress if the host is completely changed into the Body,Blood ,Soul and divinity of OUR LORD ? It no longer has worldly elements when received.

    Offline Pax Vobis

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 10299
    • Reputation: +6212/-1742
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Does SSPX still believe in TRANSUBSTANSIATION ?
    « Reply #4 on: November 12, 2018, 09:47:15 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote
    It no longer has worldly elements when received.
    It still has the worldly accidents of bread and the gluten is still there.


    Offline songbird

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4670
    • Reputation: +1765/-353
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Does SSPX still believe in TRANSUBSTANSIATION ?
    « Reply #5 on: November 12, 2018, 10:32:03 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • A priest can still give a crumb.

    Offline Last Tradhican

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6293
    • Reputation: +3327/-1937
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Does SSPX still believe in TRANSUBSTANSIATION ?
    « Reply #6 on: November 12, 2018, 11:27:35 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!1
  • A priest can still give a crumb.
    Yes that is the way it is done. When the priest gets to the person, he breaks off a small chip and gives it to the person.

    However, in the example the OP gave, the priests is giving a special communion to the person. I have seen it done, the priests after he is done with everyone, goes up to the tabernacle and brings back the special host just for that one person. It is quite a spectacle on Sundays. 

    In my opinion, it is an unnecessary spectacle for the parents or the person. I think it has to do more with pride than avoiding illness. If the person was so allergic to wheat that they can't even eat a small chip, then they would be sick all the time, because there are more accidental pieces of wheat in all the food that they eat every day.
    The Vatican II church - Assisting Souls to Hell Since 1962

    For there shall arise false Christs and false prophets, and shall show great signs and wonders, insomuch as to deceive (if possible) even the elect. Mat 24:24

    Offline Pax Vobis

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 10299
    • Reputation: +6212/-1742
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Does SSPX still believe in TRANSUBSTANSIATION ?
    « Reply #7 on: November 12, 2018, 11:42:33 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote
    In my opinion, it is an unnecessary spectacle for the parents or the person. I think it has to do more with pride than avoiding illness. If the person was so allergic to wheat that they can't even eat a small chip, then they would be sick all the time, because there are more accidental pieces of wheat in all the food that they eat every day.
    I think you're being too judgemental here and overly dramatic.  If the priest decides that such a thing is necessary or prudent, then accept his decision.  If you were involved with the discussions, then you are allowed an opinion, but i'm assuming you weren't.  Exceptions like this are allowed by the Church, who is Our Mother and not a liturgical dictator.  It's not a "spectacle" for a priest to make an allowance in an extraordinary case.


    Offline Last Tradhican

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6293
    • Reputation: +3327/-1937
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Does SSPX still believe in TRANSUBSTANSIATION ?
    « Reply #8 on: November 12, 2018, 12:11:02 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • I think you're being too judgemental here and overly dramatic.  If the priest decides that such a thing is necessary or prudent, then accept his decision.  If you were involved with the discussions, then you are allowed an opinion, but i'm assuming you weren't.  Exceptions like this are allowed by the Church, who is Our Mother and not a liturgical dictator.  It's not a "spectacle" for a priest to make an allowance in an extraordinary case.
    I'd be more interested in what other celiac sufferers have to say, as I know two, and all their lives they've just taken the small fragment from the priests. That is the reason for my opinion. I really do not give a hoot about  a priest going through that extra effort. The question is, is it necessary? Are there any celiac sufferers who want to enlighten us?
    The Vatican II church - Assisting Souls to Hell Since 1962

    For there shall arise false Christs and false prophets, and shall show great signs and wonders, insomuch as to deceive (if possible) even the elect. Mat 24:24

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41846
    • Reputation: +23909/-4344
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Does SSPX still believe in TRANSUBSTANSIATION ?
    « Reply #9 on: November 12, 2018, 12:23:18 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Actually, a lot of people who have issues with gluten have no problems if they go back to "ancient grain" forms of wheat.  Gluten only became a problem in the 50s when they genetically mutated wheat (not GMO like today but creating mutations and picking out the desired strains).

    From a Prot site:
    Quote
    There certainly are many references to grains in the Bible, and with good reason. The Bible was compiled during a predominately agricultural time, and this would have been a reference that was easily understood by the people during that time period.

    Though the Bible references grains, the grains consumed a couple thousand years ago bear little to no resemblance to the grains we consume (or don’t consume!) today.

    In Jesus’ time, there were only three major types of wheat in existence: Einkorn, Emmer, and later Triticuм aestivum along with simple, non-hybrid varieties of other grains like barley, millet, and rye. These grains had (and still have) a higher protein content and lower anti-nutrient content than grains of today.

    This is a stark contrast to the 25,000+ species that exist today, most of which we created in a lab to be disease resistant or produce high yields. In order to achieve these traits like disease and pest resistance, scientists had to enhance the part of the grains that naturally resists disease and predators: mainly, the glutens, lectins, and phytates- the most harmful parts of the grains to humans.

    In addition, these hybridized strains are often allergen producing and usually sprayed with pesticides and chemicals. It is interesting to note that some people who are allergic to modern strains of wheat show little to no reaction to (properly prepared) Einkorn wheat in small amounts.

    So, the grains of Jesus’ time weren’t genetically similar to the grains of today, and had lower concentrations of the harmful com
    ponents. In addition, they were prepared much differently:
      
    My wife and one of my daughters have serious gluten intolerance, and yet they had no issues at all with Emmer (when we obtained some).


    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41846
    • Reputation: +23909/-4344
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Does SSPX still believe in TRANSUBSTANSIATION ?
    « Reply #10 on: November 12, 2018, 12:24:53 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • In the Eastern Rite, there's no problem, since people receive under both species.

    But I'd really love to know what gluten free host the SSPX would be using.  For validity, wheat must be used, and I know of no gluten-free varieties of wheat.


    Offline Last Tradhican

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6293
    • Reputation: +3327/-1937
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Does SSPX still believe in TRANSUBSTANSIATION ?
    « Reply #11 on: November 12, 2018, 02:25:52 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • In the Eastern Rite, there's no problem, since people receive under both species.

    But I'd really love to know what gluten free host the SSPX would be using.  For validity, wheat must be used, and I know of no gluten-free varieties of wheat.
    I heard it is a type of wheat that does not bother the celiac. 
    The Vatican II church - Assisting Souls to Hell Since 1962

    For there shall arise false Christs and false prophets, and shall show great signs and wonders, insomuch as to deceive (if possible) even the elect. Mat 24:24

    Offline Last Tradhican

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6293
    • Reputation: +3327/-1937
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Does SSPX still believe in TRANSUBSTANSIATION ?
    « Reply #12 on: November 12, 2018, 02:27:01 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • My wife and one of my daughters have serious gluten intolerance, and yet they had no issues at all with Emmer (when we obtained some).
    Do they take the small chip at Latin Rite mass?
    The Vatican II church - Assisting Souls to Hell Since 1962

    For there shall arise false Christs and false prophets, and shall show great signs and wonders, insomuch as to deceive (if possible) even the elect. Mat 24:24

    Offline Pax Vobis

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 10299
    • Reputation: +6212/-1742
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Does SSPX still believe in TRANSUBSTANSIATION ?
    « Reply #13 on: November 12, 2018, 03:30:26 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote
    However, in the example the OP gave, the priests is giving a special communion to the person. I have seen it done, the priests after he is done with everyone, goes up to the tabernacle and brings back the special host just for that one person. It is quite a spectacle on Sundays. 
    Last Trad,
    When the priest goes back up to the altar, is he getting a "special" host or is he simply taking the time to break off a small piece, which would be easier to do at the altar instead of trying to do so beforehand and then trying to locate it between all the normal sized hosts? 

    Offline Stubborn

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 13817
    • Reputation: +5566/-865
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Does SSPX still believe in TRANSUBSTANSIATION ?
    « Reply #14 on: November 12, 2018, 03:48:13 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I'd be more interested in what other celiac sufferers have to say, as I know two, and all their lives they've just taken the small fragment from the priests. That is the reason for my opinion. I really do not give a hoot about  a priest going through that extra effort. The question is, is it necessary? Are there any celiac sufferers who want to enlighten us?
    I'd love to know the answer to this question as well, also, it seems only women have this concern.

    At our SSPX chapel, the priest goes back to the tabernacle and gets a small ciborium containing what looks to be only small pieces of the Host. A few times in the past, it looked like he brought back a small chalice, dipped a small spoon into it and placed a drop or two on the woman's tongue.
    "But Peter and the apostles answering, said: We ought to obey God, rather than men." - Acts 5:29

    The Highest Principle in the Church: "We are first of all under obedience to God, and only then under obedience to man" - Fr. Hesse