Some, who don't understand Spanish, are curious about the continuation of what Bishop Fellay says so as to understand if there is more context. I don't think that there is more being said that will diminish what he says but I have translated the subsequent paragraph: "In fact the 1942 consecration has permitted the growth of communism. Here is a very strange, curious point, but it has had a good effect: Hitler’s suppression is good, but because of that, Russia has grown. This is a very, very curious element. Another curious element: Sister Lucia said that the text should be (published) before 1960 or her death. In 1995 she said the consecration of 1984 was done and had resulted in the neutralization of a nuclear war. It is true that Russia had an atomic problem on May 13th. There was an explosion in an atomic bomb reserve. Amazingly, it was on May 13th. Immediately after the consecration of '84, the same Sister Lucia said no, that did not correspond to the order of the Mother of God. In '95, speaking on the publication of the secret she said, "If I can give advice to the Pope, it is to be very cautious about its promulgation." I have the impression that she did not want, at that time, if possible, the publication of the secret. All this is curious. One point is certain, there were two elements and one is missing. Now there is a new thesis: the part not published by Rome was destroyed by order of John XXIII. It’s possible, I do not know. I do not know; when it was published in 2000 they said they searched for the translator of the secret to reconstruct the secret, they told me. Frankly I do not know. But it has to be a terrible, terrible thing for the Church, whose publication may cause harm to the Church. I do not know what it is."
Topic: Does Bishop Fellay believe in the Fatima Message? (Read 3810 times)