In Bishop Fellay's letter (of mush jargon) to his SSPX priests: "Note Regarding the Doctrinal Declaration" (Cor Unum, Easter 2013), he also wrote this in his last paragraph:
"After sending to Rome the texts of the General Chapter of last July, I met Mgr. Di Noia on 28th August 2012, and I informed him [verbally, NOT by official letter. - ed.] that I was withdrawing our April proposal, which could no longer serve as a basis from which to work. There remains the Doctrinal Preamble of 14th September, 2011, whose substance was taken up again on 13th June, 2012, and our double response: the letters of 30th November, 2011 and 12th January 2012 on the one hand; on the other, the 14th July 2012 Declaration of the General Chapter with the conditions required for any canonical recognition.
+Bernard Fellay."
http://www.therecusant.com/fellay-note-cor-unum-mar2013
Machabees, you say, "he also wrote..."
That bolded part of his last paragraph was THE WHOLE POINT of the Easter
Cor Unum! So how did he deal it out? Not in the Cor Unum, no, that would
be 'too obvious.' He put it in an 'attachment' or another docuмent. He put
it in the "Note Regarding the Doctrinal Declaration" (Cor Unum, Easter 2013).
And then was it in the first paragraph? No.
Was it in the second paragraph? No.
Was it in the third paragraph? No. ..........
....... It was
in paragraph number eleven. . . . . . <<----(that's a link!)
In paragraph number 11 of a
separate docuмent, referred to in the
Cor Unum as the 'explanatory note,' or, as +Fellay refers to it, the
"introductory text ... so you can put [my
AFD] in context" --
"Concerning the text of the Doctrinal Declaration which caused so
much turbulence of soul last year, I refer you to the introductory
text which I drafted, so that you can put it in context" --
..he placed these words
at the very end of the core body of his
Easter Cor Unum,
just before the three asterisks and the concluding
words that begin, "For the present, let’s look to the future, our souls
serene ounce again. Providence is good, Providence which has
permitted us to consecrate our Society to St. Joseph
precisely at
the moment when the new Pope inaugurated his Pontificate..."
That would be
precisely at the moment the new Pope was kissing the Argentine Jєωess who ran +Williamson out of her country, Kirchner.
Therefore, in paragraph 11 of a separate docuмent, mentioned at the
very end of his Cor Unum message body: it's all buried as deep as he
would dare try to bury it -- at the
end of the
attachment mentioned at the
end of an
internal bulletin, the Easter Cor Unum.
IOW --
He did not want to say this,
but he really had to.
Never mind the
declarations, the sermons and the conferences all
designed to
affirm the contrary, even though it is a
LIE.
He put it off as long as he could! He tried
so hard to hide it, to be
sneaky.
He made it so you have
to look with a magnifying glass to find it.
NOW, YOU'RE READY TO READ THE END OF B. FELLAY'S FOURTH
PARAGRAPH OF HIS EASTER COR UNUM!
"Never mind the declarations, the sermons and the conferences which affirm the contrary, we’re going to look with a magnifying glass anything which we can misunderstand, in order, in an incredible process of intention, to discredit authority and make it seem lying or sneaky. It’s a real enterprise of subversion, which sows mistrust among priests and laity, and destabilises the government of our society with a view to weakening it or killing it." In the typical manner of Liberals, when he accuses his opposition, the
Resistance, +Fellay uses language that better defines his own actions.
How to read this:
Fellay ignores the declarations of the good priests like Frs. Pfeiffer,
Hewko, Chazal, Girouard, Cardozo and Dom Tomas Aquino, among
others. He ignores their sermons and their conferences that they have
made public on YouTube and MP3 that expose his own lies and
self-incrimination. He denounces their work of exposing his nefarious
actions by saying they use "a magnifying glass" to see anything they
can "misunderstand!" This, as B. Fellay proceeds to misunderstand
THEM, and he does so deliberately, with an incredible process of
intention -- just like his intentional subversion of the Society that
he has been engaged in for the past 19 years, for the entirety of his
office as SG. Fellay's is a real enterprise of subversion, which sows
mistrust among priests and laity, and it destabilizes the government of
the SSPX with a view to turning it over wholesale to modernist Rome
by means of a dirty 'deal' or else, failing that, then with a perverse
desire to weaken or kill it.