Beautiful +ABL quotations!
Thank you Francis.
It becomes obvious why the SSPX’s masonic cabal had to suppress the Archbishop’s sermons. To claim copyrights and then “deep six” them. 🤦🏻♂️
The new SSPX is riddled with compromises to Catholic tradition.
A new data point made known to me, supporting this concern of abuse of the Sacrament of Penance, comes from Louisville, KY.
A zealous trad convert unfamiliar with the SSPX made his way to their Confessional.
After confessing his sins, hearing nothing, he had doubts if the priest had absolved him?
He went back to the chapel to inquire and was told that Father used a vape pipe in the Confessional and therefore was unable to make audible absolutions.
I am not making this up.
The testimony was 1st hand and unsolicited.
Folks, realize there is a full on world war going on for our souls. The devil is quite clever in his methods to deceive us.
Stay on guard, use your God given intellect and graces to discern and resist deceptions.
So, if what you're relating is correct, does that mean that the Priest in question:
1) Does not give the penitent any advice whatsoever (since that would have to be audible to the penitent)
2) Does not impose a penance (since that would have to be audible to the penitent)
3) Does not preach a sermon (since that would have to be audible to the people)
4) And does not in fact celebrate Mass (since most of that is audible to the people)?
How did your informant even know to leave the Confessional, if he heard nothing at all?
If the person is so concerned, why did they raise the objection while in the Confessional?
What was the point of your informant asking someone else at the chapel what happened in the informant's own Confession, when that third party would have know way of knowing what happened in your informant's Confession?
Topic: Discerning proper absolutions in SSPX Confessionals (Read 4850 times)