Those of us who are not  in the US are wondering what the reaction of the faithful there is? How much support is estimated for Menzingen, +Fellay and Fr Rostand? and what estimated percentage of the faithful are against all this political manoeuvering? Are Mons Tissier de Mallerais and Mons de Galarreta obliged to reside in the US and Geneva respectively? Do they not have a choice?

Surely Mons Fellay, apart from being the Sup Gen, is just another of the 4 bishops? I am curious as to what the SSPX constitution says...?

We hear nothing from down under,  ie Australia and New Zealand; what goes on there? Apart from Fr Black, I don't know who all the other priests are over there. Are the faithful in general agreement with Menzingen? We don't seem to hear anything from them. Just curious...  :scratchchin:

I think that we have a problem where the Spanish-speaking countries are concerned, as well as with the French, as it is difficult to gauge the activity and reactions to what we are currently reading about in the States.

This is what alarms me the most about the new SSPX regime; they work in the dark, they hide their objectives from us. That, I believe is what has everyone here alarmed. This had never existed before in the SSPX.



But he that doth truth, cometh to the light, that his works may be made manifest, because they are done in God. (John 3:21)

Spelling again: Fr. Paul Schoonbroodt

It is clear that a warfare is going-on within the SSPX, as well as within the rest of the church. It is clear that Father Arnault Rostand is not a non-partisan. The mask is taken out and since he conducted in the name calling game during this last Sunday's Mass at Carson City in falsely labeling "sedevacantists" the opponents to the regime of Menzingen could continue to up the antes. I would not be a part of such a game, because I am no saint to cast a first stone, however, I'd like to publicly ask the Superior General of the SSPX of the United States what he exactly means by "novelties". Father Rostand used this particular word to criticize the post Vatican church during his homely, however as a priest he seemed to have used "novelties" himself during this Mass of last Sunday, because he had skipped the Epistle, in going directly to the Gradual. Then after the homely, during the Offertory's silent prayer of Psalm 25, there must have been a sudden "speed-up" in his delivery of the prayers: It take almost a minute to go from the "Lavabo inter innocentes manus meas" to the last words of "Suscipe sancta Trinitas" 's last words, prior to the loudly said "Orate frates, etc.". Father Arnault Rostand said such silent prayers in just a few seconds... I am only a layman, but it appeared that our District Superior took short-cuts in the delivery of the Tridentine Mass. Perhaps priests may explain..., of may be Father Rostand was engaging in novelties by truncating the Mass of All Time. A sign, that the modernists within the Society intend to use novelties after their anricipated attachement to the conciliars.

One of the key differences in everything Novus Ordo compared to the
Canonized Traditional Latin Mass, is the truncation of material. They provide
numerous "options" for the pres-byter to use, and in practice, it most usually
comes down to taking the shortest route.

This practice is quite offensive to God. Our Lady came to the shepherd children at
Fatima and told them they should not abbreviate their prayers. The Angel of Portugal
had also instructed them about that. The children had been shortening their Rosary
to saying "Hail Mary; Holy Mary. Hail Mary; Holy Mary..." Certainly, their intentions
were not evil, for they were saying what they thought to be the Rosary, only more
quickly so they could get to their anticipated games they wanted to play.

Our Lady also told them to not pray the prayers too quickly. How many even today
pay no attention to this, but rush through their prayers? This causes a loss of grace,
and tends to dissipate devotion. When said in a group, it causes tensions, for the
ones who have habitually done their prayers too quickly get upset with those who
are "praying too slowly!" And in other languages, it causes division, for example,
it's practically impossible to say the Dios te salve Maria as quickly (in Spanish) as it is
to say the Hail Mary in English. So the Hispanics who say their Rosary in their own
language (because they don't know English) find themselves always behind, which
makes them feel marginalized or "not up to speed." To remedy this, some of them
take to rapid-fire words, which is possible, but it fairly evacuates the prayers of
their piety and devotion.

To hear that Fr. Rostand is making such a scandalous example, it can only be from
a spirit of subversion. He is not immune from knowledge. He knows exactly what
he is doing. I could most easily speculate on his intentions, but I don't have to. We
all know what they are.

He is using example as a means of effecting a transition. We have been here
before. How many worldly churchgoers praise any priest who "gets through the
Mass" more quickly than another one? These same worldlings would be entirely
miserable assisting at the Mass of any of the Saints of the Church! We are not
there to "get it out of the way" so we can get on to something more fun. The time
we have at Mass is an ETERNAL BLESSING, for those in Purgatory have no such
time any more, and only regrets for not having used the time they were given
more wisely.

And those in hell, as it were, regret ever having been to Mass at all!

(...It is only with deep repugnance and unspeakable disgust that I write words such as pray, Mass, holy water, and church. I profoundly detest those who go to church, as well as everyone and everything in general. For us, everything is a torment. Everything we come to understand at death, every recollection of life and of what we know, becomes a burning flame.4... -- 4. Saint Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologica, Supplement (New York: Benzinger Brothers, Inc., 1948), Q.98, art. 7 – “in the damned there will be actual consideration of the things they knew heretofore as matters of sorrow, but not as a cause of pleasure. For they will consider both the evil they have done, and for which they were damned, and the delightful goods they have lost, and on both counts they will suffer torments.” [back to text]  http://www.cathinfo.com/catholic.php/The-Letter-from-Beyond-a-story-of-one-woman-s-life )

Fr. Paul Schoonbroodt's websites are miraculously still viewable:

...In the final annex to this VM message, we do invite our readers – be they clergymen or laymen – to read,
reread and meditate on the INFALLIBLE encyclical text Humanum Genus of April 20, 1884, from the
Magisterium of Pope Leo XIII, by which this Pontiff infallibly exposes, denounces and condemns the "Sect
of the Freemasons", as well as their "misleading" methods and their "infamous and criminal enterprises."
While considering the INFALLIBLE terms chosen by Pope Leo XIII to passionately condemn Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ by
his encyclical Humanum Genus, the Catholic readers, clergy or laymen, will be able to measure the
ABSOLUTELY MOST SERIOUS character of the public approval from a confirmed, acknowledged,
enthusiast Gnostic freemason program book of Father Celier for the joining of the SSPX with the
Masonic, globalist, apostate, “ecuмenical” Conciliar church.
Leo XIII points his finger at the secret methods of the Masonic sect:
"Undoubtedly, one can see that they belong to the family of clandestine corporations, and that they
behave like them. They have, in fact, kinds of mysteries that their constitution forbids with the
greatest care to divulge, not only to people outside, but even to a considerable number of their
followers."

And what does Bishop Fellay show since the year 2000 in the SSPX? The same Masonic methods of
secrecy!...

http://www.virgo-maria.org/articles/2009/VM-2009-11-11-A-00-Question-about-Bishop-Fellay.pdf

This keeps getting better and better -- or is that "worse and worse?"


This cult of the secret keeps on spreading in the government of the SSPX by Bishop Fellay. The so
called doctrinarian "discussions” with the Rome of the antichrists, by which the Swiss bishop risks the future
of the FSSPX, will unfold themselves in secrecy, behind CLOSED DOORS.

And now, in a new boost of secrecy, even the names of the members of the Commission will remain
secret!

Discussions BEHIND CLOSED DOORS, by persons that do not unveil their identity to the public, does
that not remind you of something? This is exactly the way that the Masonic Lodge functions.

We cannot but notice that Bishop Fellay imposes on the FSSPX the way of functioning of the Masonic
Lodge: this is a FACT.

Quite the opposite of Bishop Fellay and the Lodge, Bishop Lefebvre applied the Catholic way of
behaving: he kept his relations with Rome seen and known by the faithful and did not hesitate to solicit
the opinion of laymen.

How to explain that, since 2000, the year of the pilgrimage to Rome, the Direction* of the SSPX has
arrived at adopting the methods of functioning of the Masonic Lodge?

And this in an ever increasing way since the visit of Bishop Fellay to the apostate priest Ratzinger-
Benedict XVI on August 29, 2005?


Ask your priests and your bishops:

• How is it possible that the [Directorship]* of the SSPX promotes
and sells this Masonic program book without any penalty?

• How is it possible that Bishop Fellay imposes this Masonic
policy by terror?

• Do you want our children to finish in the Lodge?


Go to the site PDF and see, the figure  is three asterisks arranged as
a pyramid, something like this:

.*
**

 
*The word, "Direction" seems to be a translation problem, and ought to be
"Directorship" in English.



It should be rather obvious now that the reason Fr. Schoonbroodt was sued and
then "offed" was that he was all too close to the real, dirty secret of +Fellay & Co.

Kelley and whoever else, these posts above are all contained in the PDF file linked
in the first post, the website run by the (martyred?) Fr. Schoonbroodt:

[Note the author, probably Fr. Schoonbroodt, repeatedly uses the term "the
apostate priest Ratzinger-Benedict XVI" but because I am quoting his Virgo-Maria
website it does not mean that I am sedevacantist. I do, however, respect his
informed, priestly opinion, and I can read, say and copy this language without any
scruple, except perhaps the scandal it might give to others who are not of my same
mindset. I pray for the Holy Father at Mass, "una cuм," and my local bishop,
Jose Gomez, even though I do not agree with them, nor do I follow their apostate
Novus Ordo liturgy. These are indeed terrible times, and I do not envy the simple
minded who are so easily thrown off the rails by the sinister and pernicious fog of
diabolical disorientation that surrounds us in these terrible days.]

http://www.virgo-maria.org/articles/2009/VM-2009-11-11-A-00-Question-about-Bishop-Fellay.pdf



[This is a portion of chapter 15. In the end of August 2009, directly questioned and damaged by the scandal,
Bishop Fellay persists to support the Fathers Celier and de Cacqueray and the
Masonic politics exposed in the program book "Benedict XVI and the
traditionalists"]





SOME CHRONOLOGICALLY CLARIFYING REMINDERS:

Bishop Fellay, and especially Father de Cacqueray, Superior of the District of France, have applied
themselves most actively - as we have recalled above - to condition the minds of the traditional clergy and
faithful in order to prepare them for the publication of the Motu Proprio of the apostate priest Ratzinger-
Benedict XVI. Their action has been well reinforced by public "lectures" that used, without quoting them, the
‘nice’ pages of the Masonic program book "Benedict XVI and the traditionalists". The book was at that time
being compiled to appear six months later.

Precisely for that reason Virgo-Maria took the initiative to publish very widely the solemn open letter of
October 10, 2006 from the faithful of the Catholic Tradition to the four bishops.44.

Looking back today, one gets a better understanding of the despising and incomprehensible stubborn
silence that this solemn, anxious appeal – respectful and legitimate - has met from the side of the
Fraternity’s bishops.

Nevertheless, it is at this time as well, in October 2006 that Virgo-Maria could catch Bishop Fellay in a
deliberate lie45 on October 12, 2006 in the microphone of Radio Courtoisie with the intention of
cheating the listeners about his connections with the Roman Conciliar authorities.
____________________________________________________________

44http://www.virgo-maria.org/articles/2006/VM-2006-10-10-A-00-Appel_aux_quatre_eveques_de_la_FSSPX.pdf
http://www.virgo-maria.org/articles/2006/VM-2006-12-16-A-00-Video_lettre_aux_4_eveques.pdf

45http://www.virgo-maria.org/articles/2006/VM-2006-10-19-A-00-L_abbe_Lorans_compromet_Mgr_Fellay.pdf
http://www.virgo-maria.org/articles/2006/VM-2006-10-20-A-00-Les_mensonges_de_Mgr_Fellay.pdf
http://www.virgo-maria.org/articles/2006/VM-2006-10-23-A-00-
Traditio_denonce_le_mensonge_public_de_Mgr_Fellay_1.pdf
http://www.virgo-maria.org/articles/2006/VM-2006-10-30-A-00-La_lettre_secrete_de_Hoyos_a_Mgr_Fellay.pdf






And then, on November 5, 2006, the Institute of the Good Shepherd is being established in the media, an
institute integrated in the Masonic and globalist Conciliar Roman Church under the direction of the former vicar
of Saint Nicolas du Chardonnet in Paris, Father Philippe Laguérie. Exactly on that day Father Lorans used
the sacristy46 of this same church (although his former vicar, Father Beauvais47, was then apparently held
in ignorance – according to his sermon on the pulpit) to summon a press conference to declare to the
television news of Claire Chazal on France’s channel one TF1, right from the sacristy of Saint-Nicolas-du-
Chardonnet, that he "feels demonized", and that he wishes "to find freedom of the city in the Church". This
televised interview was resumed and broadcasted in prime time on the eight o’clock news of TF1 journalist
Claire Chazal, thus offering world wide support for these matters by the weight of the picture of the
church of Saint-Nicolas-du-Chardonnet, since 1977 known all over the world as "beacon church" of the
resistance of the Catholic Tradition to the liturgical subversion of the globalist, Masonic and apostate
Conciliar Church …

After Father Celier’s and Father Lorans’s censorship of the very deliberate comments by which Bishop
Fellay, at the Paris symposium of January 7, 2007, of "Si-si-No-no", had dared to criticize the very
recent public apostasy - intensively covered by the media -, of the apostate priest Ratzinger-Benedict
XVI at the blue mosque of Istanbul, that we have recalled above, Father Celier hurried to sell in Paris a
booklet of 12 pages (“From Assisi to Istanbul”) devoted to the apostasy at the blue mosque48.

The commentary of Father Celier aimed only to sweeten and to render acceptable the behavior of the
apostate priest Ratzinger for the clergy and faithful, and to lessen within the SSPX the shock wave of
the scandal caused by this apostasy.
16 years to the day after the unexpected disappearance of Archbishop Lefebvre, and at the approach of the
announced publication of the Motu Proprio of the apostate priest Ratzinger-Benedict XVI, on March 25,
2007, Bishop Fellay - when questioned on the sacramental validity of the new Conciliar Order by a
layman (obviously very closely connected with Suresnes and Menzingen) on his own internet site
Donec Ponam, replying publicly for the first time to this most serious question (that already was the
core of the solemn anxious public appeal of the faithful of October 2006 at the four bishops of the
FSSPX, remaining unanswered even then) - dared to assert publicly the three following suggestions49,
already anathemized for being in total contradiction with the constant and infallible Magisterium of the Holy
Catholic Church and of its Pontiffs, on this vital question:

• First suggestion:
"As for the Priesthood (…), when a bishop confers the sacrament of the priesthood, even according to
the new ritual, while observing the ritual prescriptions, especially if it is enunciated in Latin, the
sacrament is a priori valid. (…) The same applies to the Episcopal consecration."

• Second suggestion:
"We must insist on the probability of the validity of an ordination"

• Third suggestion:
"The faithful must start from the a priori principle that these priests are ordained validly, for the
invalidity of the ordination remains an exception. They will have therefore, to consider that an
ordination, even modern, is valid."

This ritual probabilism, particularly gravissime in the matter of the Holy Orders, intolerable, and harshly
condemned by the Infallible Magisterium of the Holy Church, caused a stir among some priests of the
SSPX, of whom Father Scott 50, at the time Superior of the District of Australia of the SSPX, recalled in
_________________________________________________________

46 http://www.virgo-maria.org/articles/2006/VM-2006-11-05-A-00-Abbe_Lorans_TF1_St_Nicolas.pdf
http://www.virgo-maria.org/articles_HTML/2006/011_2006/VM-2006-11-05/2006-11-05_TF1_Lorans.mp3

47 http://www.virgo-maria.org/articles/2009/VM-2009-08-12-A-00-Chardonnet_manipulateur.pdf

48 http://www.virgo-maria.org/articles/2007/VM-2007-01-17-A-00-Mgr_Fellay_censure_par_infiltres_5.pdf
http://www.virgo-maria.org/articles/2007/VM-2007-01-26-A-01-Plan%20de%20Matraquage_1.pdf
http://www.virgo-maria.org/articles/2007/VM-2007-01-04-A-00-Ratzinger_apostasie_mosquee_bleue.pdf

49 http://www.virgo-maria.org/articles/2007/VM-2007-06-04-A-00-Mgr_Fellay_Donec_Ponam.pdf
http://www.rore-sanctifica.org/etudes/2007/RORE_Communique-2007-06-03_Probabilisme_Mgr_Fellay.pdf
http://www.virgo-maria.org/articles/2008/VM-2008-12-27-A-00-Constellation_tutiorisme.pdf

50 http://www.rore-sanctifica.org/etudes/2008/RORE_Communique-2008-09-25_Abbe_Scott-reordinations.pdf
Father Scott distinguished himself by courageously denouncing the heresies contained in the encyclicals of the apostate priest
Ratzinger-Benedict XVI, and especially by protesting from the day of its publication against the Motu Proprio which downdowngrades the
Holy Tridentine Mass, hypocritically as much as impudently qualified by the apostate priest Ratzinger-Benedict XVI as “extraordinary form”, to a rank even lower than that of the Masonic sacrilegious and invalid Synaxis of Bugnini∴-Montini/PaulVI,
described as “ordinary form of the SINGLE Latin rite of the Holy Catholic Mass”
http://w ww.virgo-maria.org/articles/2007/VM-FLASH-2007-07-11-F-00-Abbe_Scott_contre_Unique_rite.pdf
http://www.virgo-maria.org/articles/2007/VM-2007-07-14-C-00-Abbe_Scott_Motu_Proprio.pdf






an article published in the American magazine of the Fraternity The Angelus, the Tutiorist doctrine of
the Church in the matter, while refuting this impious probabilism, advocated by Bishop Fellay in order not
to foil the then imminent release of the Motu Proprio.

In the end of April 2007, at the approach of the publication of the Motu Proprio of the apostate priest
Ratzinger-Benedict XVI, Virgo-Maria, in the person of its then director Father Marchiset, is the object of
a deliberate judicial aggression "in summary judgment", that was meant to be "mortal" and final, from
a layman, obviously closely connected to Suresnes and Menzingen, aiming to financially ruin Father
Marchiset, and especially to obtain the final closing of the site of religious information Virgo-Maria51,
whose news items already disturb so many infiltrators within the SSPX.

The protection of the Most Holy Virgin Mary, this admirable and powerful Mater Admirabilis, under
whose special patronage this site Virgo-Maria has placed itself officially straightaway as early as its
foundation in February 2006, has allowed Father Marchiset to miraculously overcome52 this most
distressing episode, and to see his judicial expenses returned to almost the last penny.

From 9 to 11 November 2007, The Fraternity of Saint Pius X has been organizing a Symposium in Paris in
honor of the centennial of the encyclical Pascendi Dominis Gregis of Saint Pius X, the famous encyclical
by which this Patron Saint of the Fraternity Saint Pius X, infallibly defined and condemned Modernism, and it
had placed it under the aegis of Bishop Tissier de Mallerais, who was irresponsible for the final
synthesis in his closing lecture.

In this closing conference53 – from then on famous due to Virgo-Maria, Bishop Tissier de Mallerais
made a minute analysis of the texts published by the apostate priest Ratzinger-Benedict XVI, before and after
his "election" to the Pontificate, and showed the consistency and the coherence in time of the way of
thinking of this heretical apostate, while demonstrating in what this renegade had to be qualified as a
“Super Modernist”, according to the very criteria infallibly proclaimed a century ago by the great Pope
Pius X.

Knowing that this key lecture would be brutally censored by the infiltrated priests who shut off the media
communication of the SSPX, Virgo-Maria has obtained a tape recording of it, and has made a
meticulously exact verbatim account, and made sure that it got the widest publication among the
clergy and the faithful of the Tradition, to the great displeasure of the infiltrated priests.

This key text of the verbatim account of the closing lecture of Bishop Tissier even was resumed and
published later by Max Barret, in his ‘Courrier de Tychique”, without daring to publicly identify its
origin!

And indeed, as Virgo-Maria had anticipated correctly, when the acts of this symposium were published
eighteen months later in June 2009 by Suresnes (i.e. among others by the gang of Father Celier and
Father Cocault-Duverger), the lecture and even the name of Bishop Tissier had completely disappeared
from the work54, emulating the practices and methods of the editions under the Bolshevik system during its
worst criminal periods!

Let us, finally, add that, faced with the continuing factual and docuмented accusations of the crimes of the
ex(?)-Anglican British Bishop Richard Williamson, the Fraternity’s bishop with the Rose, his n°1 mole,
infiltrated since 1972 in the sacerdotal work of Archbishop Lefebvre, for years protector, organizer and
promoter – although duly warned – of ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ rapist predator priests in his Seminary of the SSPX in
Winona, Father de Cacqueray, Superior of the District of France, has tried to silence particularly the
factual an docuмented accusations of Virgo-Maria on this subject, in order to protect the Fraternity’s
bishop with the Rose, and has since July 2008 tried to threaten, with harsh judicial pursuit Father
Schoonbroodt, director of Virgo-Maria since February 2008, by one of his most close and most active
layman cooperators of Suresnes.
_______________________________________________________________

51 http://www.virgo-maria.org/articles/2007/VM-2007-04-24-A-00-Qui_veut_la_mort_de_Virgo_Maria_2.pdf

52 http://www.virgo-maria.org/articles/2007/VM-2007-06-26-A-00-Jugement_du_refere.pdf
http://www.virgo-maria.org/articles/2007/Refere-2007-05-10.pdf

53 http://www.virgo-maria.org/articles/2007/VM-2007-11-29-MgrTissier_SuperModernisme.pdf
http://www.virgo-maria.org/articles/2007/VM-2007-11-14-A-00-Mgr_Tissier_a_Paris.pdf
http://www.virgo-maria.org/articles/2007/2007-11-11-Mgr_Tissier_Modernisme.pdf

54 http://www.virgo-maria.org/articles/2009/VM-2009-07-22-A-00-Conciliarisation-rampante-de-la-FSSPX.pdf




We could go on indefinitely with this chronological list, but the demonstrative evidence of the effectiveness
and the irreplaceable character of the role of VM to maintain a religious factual informed information
for the clergy and faithful on the mortal drift, currently in course, of the work of preservation of the
sacramentally valid sacrificial Priesthood, founded in 1970 by Archbishop Lefebvre, against the perverse
schemes of the depraved priests that have infiltrated within his work, has here and now been fully
established from this handful of chronological elements that we have just recalled: it suffices for the
reader, who can read French and would try to obtain more precise information in these matters, to refer himself
to the various electronic links placed at the bottom of the pages of the French edition of this docuмent, to be
found at www.virgo-maria.org.


OUR PROVISIONAL CONCLUSION:

-a HYPOTHESIS compatible with these FACTS that have been ESTABLISHED in
such a SHOCKING WAY
We no longer expect henceforth that a fearless as much as improbable French Mino Peccorelli, ready to
risk his skin to reveal the truth on the Masonic infiltration of the Fraternity, will publish the registers of
clerical Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ corresponding to this subject.

Whether it pleases Bishop Tissier de Mallerais or not, who dared, in the choir of Saint Nicolas du
Chardonnet, on March 12, 2009, in the presence of the Holy Sacrament, to wantonly deny55 the
authenticity of the Peccorelli list, the publication of which the Italian journalist paid for by his life.

Let us recall the method of inscription of the code names of the affiliates in the Masonic registers56, published
in September 1978 at the price of his life by the journalist Mino Peccorelli: the code name of a mason in
these registers has four letters: the two first ones of the surname followed by the two first ones of his
Christian name. For example, Annibale Bugnini is listed under the code name of BUAN.

According to this method, and in the hypothesis that Father Celier, just as his editor and author of the
foreword of his book, the FM Jean-Luc Maxence, would belong also to the Lodge, which remains up to
this day a simple hypothesis, the result would be: Grégoire Celier = CEGR
Is it not extremely astonishing that we just discovered the exact anagram of the GREC, a Parisian
clerical circle, regularly frequented by the Fathers Celier and Lorans57, where important personalities of
the conciliar Church like to entertain themselves with priests of the SSPX, secretly and completely devoted to
the joining of the Fraternity Saint Pius X with the Masonic global apostate Rome?
Accidentally?

In any case, one can wonder why this group chose such a name for itself!
Could it be a clerical wink intended for the initiated?
On this point, all that is left for us is conjectures.

It is, nevertheless, simple to observe that the astonishing ascension of Father Celier within the SSPX
began in Paris in 1994 58 after the election that year of Bishop Bernard Fellay by the General Chapter of
_____________________________________________________

55 http://www.virgo-maria.org/articles/2009/VM-2009-08-23-B-00-Reseaux_de_Sodano.pdf

56 http://www.virgo-maria.org/articles/2007/ListeAGNOLI_Pecorelli_version_1_3reduit.xls
http://www.virgo-maria.org/articles/2007/Agnoli-Liste.pdf

57 http://www.virgo-maria.org/articles/2008/VM-2008-09-07-A-00-Abbe_Lorans_primant_les_conciliaires.pdf
http://www.virgo-maria.org/articles/2007/VM-2007-07-31-A-00-Abbe_Lorans-GREC.pdf
http://www.virgo-maria.org/articles/2006/VM-2006-06-17-3-00-
Petite_grammaire_du_GREC_de_l_abbe_Lorans%20(1).pdf
http://www.virgo-maria.org/articles/2006/VM-2006-06-19-Rectificatif_de_la_petite_grammaire_du_GREC.pdf
http://www.virgo-maria.org/articles/2006/VM-2006-06-25-1-00-
Communique_de_Mme_Perol_recu_le_24_juin_2006.pdf

58 In 1994, three years after the unexpected disappearance of Bishop Lefebvre, Father Celier “was indeed bombarded” by
Bishop Fellay, the new General Superior of the SSPX, and by Father Aulagnier, then Superior of the District of France of the
Fraternity, with the direction of the Fideliter magazine and the Clovis Editions...

[King Clovis of France was the first Catholic King]



the SSPX for twelve years to the function of Superior General of the Fraternity Saint Pius X. The GREC
was founded 4 years later, in 1998, in the same city.
The foundation of the GREC actually happened in Paris in 1998, two years before the Pilgrimage of the
FSSPX to Rome on the occasion of the Jubilee of the year 2000. This pilgrimage was decided by
Bishop Fellay. The Fraternity cashed, as a matter of fact, in the same year the very important legacies59
that had always been blocked in France, by the French Ministry of the Interior and Worship, that is,
since the famous "petit Father Combes", very well known for its traditional links with the Freemasons.
If such a HYPOTHESIS, concerning Father Celier and his eventual code name, could be proven, it
would mean that this person would be actually considered, both by the French FM and the Vatican,
as constituting an ace in the hole within the Fraternity and its District of France to finally organize the
quick joining of the FSSPX with the globalist, Masonic Conciliar Rome, and therefore, to quickly realize
the break-up of the only sacerdotal work that still preserves on the five continents the transmission of
the true sacramentally valid Catholic sacrificial Priesthood according to the Latin rite ( see www.roresanctifica.org ).

We do not know anything about it,
but in any case, such a hypothesis would perfectly explain the rising and so totally shocking authority
(shown by the FACTS, well established60 today, and by his constant, well noticed behavior) that Father
Celier exercises on his "Superior" within the Fraternity of Saint Pius X, just as well as in Menzingen on
Bishop Fellay, and in Suresnes on Father de Cacqueray. His rising and authority are worthy of a true
“Godfather".
______________________________________________________




[58 cont'd]...He exerted then since more than one decade, in connection with his friend Yves Chiron, the function of teacher of students of
the the last year of the secondary school of the Fraternity’s traditional catholic College in Chateauroux, teaching them his
“Course in Philosophy” which he published in 1994 under the title “the mortal god” at Fideliter Editions. This book constitutes, as
demonstrated by the Circle of Athens, a genuine “Initiatory Guide of Apostasy”, taught for more than ten years to the last year
secondary school students of the traditional catholic College of Chateauroux, of which some, thus led astray, have been able to
enter thereafter the Seminary of Écône, in order to be ordained priests of the Fraternity Saint Pius X:

Cf. http://www.virgo-maria.org/articles/2007/VM-2007-12-01-A-00-Celier_Dieu_Mortel.pdf

59 http://www.virgo-maria.org/articles/2007/VM-2007-10-02-A-00-Lettre_a_Mgr_Fellay_dons_et_legs.pdf
http://www.virgo-maria.org/articles/2007/VM-2007-10-02-B-00-Wikipedia-FSSPX-censure-dons-et-legs.pdf
http://www.virgo-maria.org/articles/2009/VM-2009-04-10-A-00-Lettre_Upinsky_a_Mgr_Tissier.pdf
http://www.virgo-maria.org/Docuмents/A-A_Upinsky/2009-04-04-
Communique_UNIEF_Mgr_Tissier_de_Mallerais.pdf
http://www.virgo-maria.org/Docuмents/A-A_Upinsky/2009-04-04-
Lettre_ouverte_a_Mgr_Tissier_de_Mallerais.pdf

60 Some of them have been recalled higher.







[On a personal note, I met +Fellay in the late 90's in Arcadia, CA, and the look he
gave me on his face when I approached him is a look that is burned into my
memory as something that I will never forget. It made absolutely no sense to me
at the time, and I was quite puzzled. Only now, in retrospect do I understand. He
was terrified of me, and for no objective reason from my point of view, but now I
can see, that presuming he was a Freemason, what I was, how I looked, what I
said, and my demeanor, could have all added up to an approaching assassin, from
the point of view of a Freemason. I never have, nor do I ever expect to have,
such an intention, but to him at that time, that could have been what he feared...
Now I know. Now I finally understand.]
 

Hey, Jaaaack ----------- come baaaaaaaaack!

Report of the August 12, 2012 Sunday's Mass celebrated at the St. Thomas Chapel in Carson City by Father Rostand. A commentary, by a layman.


Capsule:

•The object of this posting is to demonstrate that the Superior General is conducting a political campaign.

•That the campaign currently conducted is merciless.

•That priests are being subject to pressures.

•That important players within the Society such as bishops are not only being silenced, but are simply becoming non-existent.

•That the said political campaign is dirty, and perhaps that in the passing away of Father Schoonbroodt, it is now stained with the blood of a martyr.

•And lastly, that priests, who are holy men must not [be] aware of what is going on, because laymen such as me, an [admittedly] wicked person, should never have had to write those lines.

Well, Jack, you might think you're "wicked" but you're a better man than I.  

Fr. Arnault Rostand is conducting a political campaign. Under the pretense of visiting tours, he engages in briefings of the situation of the SSPX towards Rome. His briefings are both biased and incomplete.
 
I say biased because he uses strong words to admonish the opponents [of] Bishop Bernard Fellay. The word of choice used by the Superior General is "sedevacantist." This [word] is not true, because [these] Catholics recognize the Pope, and in fact the faithful of the Society, who are true Catholics -- of the Catholic Faith defined by the Athanisian Creed -- are praying for the intentions of the Holy Father every day privately -- even if the Holy Father is openly acting as a traitor. The faithful also pray for the Holy Father during Mass as well, in the canon prayer of the "Te igitur, clementisisime," etc., which includes "una cuм famulo tuo Papa nostro Benedicti." The naming "sedevacantist" of Fr. Rostand, of the opponents to the negotiations with a Pope who is not faithful and steadfast to the Athanesian Creed, is false. It is name-calling. The Superior General is therefore conducting a name-calling campaign. He is political. He intends to demonize the ones who are against untimely negotiations with a papacy which is openly embracing the spirit of Assisi, and therefore which is a stranger to keeping the Catholic Faith entire and inviolate. The faithful who disagree with the actions of the Pope are not sedevacantists, they are simply aware of the errors of a Pope -- and are aware that God is either punishing us all, or has deliberately allowed the scuttling of His Church. Furthermore, the faithful who oppose Bishop Fellay are aware that Menzingen has gone too far in conducting behind-closed-doors negotiations with an apostate Rome.
 
I say incomplete, because Fr. Rostand, in his briefing, did not say a word about two bishops who are currently in exile in lands where the language spoken is not their mother tongue. It is evident that Bishop Tissier de Mallerais, a Frenchman by excellence is out of place in Chicago, and that Bishop de Galarreta, who speaks Spanish, should not be in Geneva. This is a misuse of half of the prelates of the (true) Catholic Church. Father Rostand spoke of defections of priests among the Society. This indicates that he opened the subject of internal affair within the Society, and his omission of the grave situation of having fifty percent of its prelates being currently in exile proves that Father Rostand is political.
 
So the Superior General is conducting in a political campaign. An election is apparently up and coming, and the electors will be the priests of the fraternity. Why would the Superior General conduct a political campaign on the pulpit, since the faithful will have no say in the re-election of Bishop Fellay? Simple: Priests are holy men, they are apolitical, and may be easily influenced. The priests may also be intimidated. I'll give you an example of such a case of intimidation: the Los Gatos Retreat lost its operating permit from the local authorities during several months of the year 2011. The "loss of operation" was suddenly lifted when Cardinal Levada resumed "behind closed doors" negotiations with the SSPX. It is to be reminded that William Cardinal Levada, Prefect of the CDF is the Archbishop Emeritus of San Francisco. As a registered parishioner of his Cathedral of St Mary of the Assumption, I somewhat know the man. He has proved to be "decisive" if not brutal once by closing down fourteen churches in a single day. Would the "loss of operation", and the sudden "regaining of a permit to operate" of the Los Gatos Retreat Center being timed with "negotiations" be coincidental, or would it be the action of the hidden hand of some lodge?

I am familiar with the Los Gatos closure and curious re-opening, and I know for
a fact that Freemasons are very much involved in government and the Building
and Safety offices in California. I've been there and done that.
 

There is no question that Fr. Rostand is the spokesman of a political campaign. I say that his camp is playing hard-ball too. There is a disturbing affair that needs to be put under the light: It is the affair of the Les Sermons de Monseigneur Marcel Lefêbvre. A book was published back in 2010 containing sermons of our saintly Archbishop. The book is in three volumes. The sermons were public addresses, given in churches to a non-paying general public during the course of time of twenty years. The exception being a letter addressed in the format of an open letter to Fathers Tissier, Williamson, Fellay and de Galarreta on the eves of their episcopal ordination. The other exception being a few addresses by Bishop de Castro Mayer. The tone of all those addresses is as lively as our good Archbishop was during his sermons, which tone is well-known to all, since those sermons are played during retreats (mainly during lunch-time). The regime of Menzingen has issued a ban of the publication of the Sermons, after having attempted to collect fees from Les Editions Saint Remi (source: Tradition In Action). Why would the regime of Menzingen, clearly represented by Father Rostand at the Massa in Carson City, Nevada of this past Sunday, and during its following Q&A session, insist on a ban of the sermons of its spiritual father? The answer given last Sunday, was about copyrights. This answer given by the Superior General is an insult! The real answer should be that the ban of those Sermons was political. Our Archbishop met with our current Pope, and the ban of the Sermons was due to political correctness. Shame on you Father Rostand!
 
Now let me place the "affairs of the Sermons" on a different level. A priest of the SSPX named Father Schoonbroodt was likely a major player in the publication of the volumes. He was old-guard within the Society. He also was the editor of the web-site, Virgo Maria, as well as of its companion web-site, Rore Sanctificate, explaining why the episcopal ordination of post June 18, 1968 by the post Vatican church are invalid, thus jeopardizing the Apostolic Succession. Those said web-sites were spirited, and incisively informative to say the least. Bishop Fellay filed a lawsuit against the priest. Father Schoonbroodt was even detained and roughed-up by the Belgian authorities. The priest became vociferous on his web-site. It was clear that Fr. Schoonbroodt was not going away quietly, and a likely show trial was on its way, then Fr. Schoonbroodt died! How did he die? A "car accident." Car accidents are the number one cause [in murder cases]. Would the hand of some lodge be behind [this]? The answer to this question will come, and in any case both heaven and hell know exactly what [happened] to Father Schoonbroodt; and everyone of us, either in hell or heaven will learn what happened to this priest who certainly [is] already a martyr as Monsignors Lefêbvre and de Castro Mayer were.
 
It is clear that warfare is going-on within the SSPX, as well as within the rest of the church. It is clear that Father Arnault Rostand is not a non-partisan. The mask is taken out and since he conducted in the name-calling game during this last Sunday's Mass at Carson City in falsely labeling "sedevacantists," the opponents to the regime of Menzingen could continue to up the antes. I would not be a part of such a game, because I am no saint to cast a first stone, however, I'd like to publicly ask the Superior General of the SSPX of the United States what he exactly means by "novelties." Father Rostand used this particular word to criticize the [post-Vatican II] church during his [homily -- should say "sermon"] however, as a priest he seemed to have used "novelties" himself during this Mass of last Sunday, because he had skipped the Epistle, in going directly to the Gradual. Then after the [homily -- should say "sermon"], during the Offertory's silent prayer of Psalm 25, there must have been a sudden "speed-up" in his delivery of the prayers: It takes almost a minute to go from the "Lavabo inter innocentes manus meas" to the last words of "Suscipe sancta Trinitas" 's last words, prior to the loudly said "Orate frates," etc. Father Arnault Rostand said such silent prayers in just a few seconds... I am only a layman, but it appeared that our District Superior took short-cuts in the delivery of the Tridentine Mass. Perhaps priests may explain..., or may be Father Rostand was engaging in novelties by truncating the Mass of All Time. A sign, that the modernists within the Society intend to use novelties after their anticipated attachment to the conciliars.
 
 

You can be sure that he was BOTH truncating the Mass AND engaging in novelties.

This is a very perceptive post, and while you are reluctant to speak up for fear of
stepping beyond your limits, believe me, it is of great benefit for we who were not
there to hear your astute observations. These Modernists are very much afraid of
being noticed in their dirty work, and when you call attention to it, they are forced
to back off.

Let us all become aware of their tactics by reading these warnings and
observations, such that when we see them happen to us in our Mass chapels, we
will be prepared to stand up and take action. I do not recommend disrupting the
Mass, but certainly when a priest speaks heresy from the pulpit we have EVERY
RIGHT to stand up and oppose him to his face! The sermon is not part of Mass! So
don't let them accuse you falsely. When they say you interrupted Mass, tell them:
No! You're WRONG AGAIN! You were wrong during your sermon, and you're wrong
now. That makes two times in a row that you're wrong! Are you going to go for
three out of three? They need to know we are not stupid lemmings. Because that's
what they have relied on: us being stupid lemmings, who PRAY, PAY and OBEY.

Remember, this is how the Arian Heresy was opposed: a layman stood up in the
4th century, and denounced a heretic bishop during his bad sermon.

In honor of Fr. Paul Schoonbroodt: he wouldn't have it any other way!