So now they're coming out more boldly: it's not the Council's fault after all but of those who misinterpret it. That's really the intended message; not the convenient cover story about Kasper's insane liberal fantasies. Who pays any attention to Kasper anyway? . . . Except perhaps Kasper?
Good topic, Neil ole buddy!
DICI . . . . . Deeply Infected with Conciliar Ideology
Thanks, wurx. Usually DICI makes little impression on me but this time I had to say something.
They're really pushing at this new theme of the subtle bishop, aren't they? He cranked out that New Model Principle in the CNS interview of two years ago and has been backpedalling ever since, but now, you see, he still holds on fast to the traditions he is trying to receive from the unclean spirit of Vat.II.
He wants to import the devil's work into the Society, that is.
So ever since his own mouth yammering the words fell flat and raised a ruckus, now he's assigning the task to his minions, his yes-men, like Fr. Lorans, which see.
It's not the Council's fault!
It's the fault of those who misinterpret the Council! Yeah! That's the ticket!!
If the Faithful don't start standing up and shouting FOUL
every time they hear this decrepit bilge scuм,
we're going to be swimming in this sewage
for the rest of our lives.
[/size][/color][/b]
.
+AMDG+
Feast of SAINT PATRICK (461 A.D.)
Good article " neil obstat " talking about exception to rules. Here in saint marys Fr. ANGLES changed parts of the mass for the laity. These parts have been in existence for centuries. The [ ettiquite etiquette] out of respect for Our Kneeling down at the Sanctus is not done now in st. marys until after you're done saying the Sanctus. Thanks to bugninni /or i mean Fr. Angles. When Fr. Griego was in st marys he said it doesn't matter what goes on outside the altar rail, but whats inside has rubrics to follow. So my question is why did Fr. Arabajis get all upset in the past month at some parishioners who knelt at an early morning mass at the beginning of the Sanctus?
Ironically, if he's the celebrant, he would have to break the rubrics himself to know for sure that the congregation knelt for the Sanctus (which BTW, is what my 1945 Fr. Lasance New Roman Missal has in it for posture in the pews at Low Mass), because he would have to TURN AROUND TO LOOK which is in violation of the rubrics. The priest turns around to say "Dominus Vobiscuм," and even then, does not look around at the congregation if he's keeping to the rubrics. So when he gets "upset," then others have the same right he does, to get upset with HIM, because he's the one violating rubrics inside the sanctuary, and the people are not inside the sanctuary so their actions have nothing to do with the rubrics.
I guess I answered my own question; at another mass he said, "So what if the Society goes back to Rome?" If he can't answer that question I feel sorry for him. He's been brainwashed, he drank the cool aid ! When are these Pius X Priests going to wake up ? Rome hates Tradition !
Unfortunately, the majority of them will never give up -- they have been corrupted and they are enjoying their new buddyship with the protestants and the local bishops. They're the new celebrities at the party. The attraction of worldliness is more to their liking, and that's a very hard thing to change -- similar to how Sodomy is a very hard habit to drop (rather impossible by natural means alone).
They have a guilt complex because we are reminding them of the family member they threw out of the house for not approving of their new immoral way of living.
Can't anyone see?
If there is nothing to our standing firm in Tradition, then why does Conciliar Rome constantly need us to validate them? Why would they even care?
Because our existence reminds everyone of the TRUTH!
Well said, holysoulsacademy!
Thank you for teaching us the Faith St. Patrick!
:smile: :smirk: :cowboy: :alcohol:
Don't miss St. Patrick's Breastplate! (http://www.cathinfo.com/catholic.php?a=topic&t=30460&min=10#p3)
.