Well I understand that Fr. S had removed that page, and that once he left, the page was re-instated.

If he were still there, I bet that docuмent would still be gone. And the school would still be functioning just fine!


But even if it were required by law (and 100% enforced), I'd still have to ask: Is this what we've come to? To operate schools, we must "officially" condone deviant behavior, even if "unofficially" we speak against it?

This smacks of a compromise; the proverbial "grain of incense" offered to a false god. Like the priests of England submitting to the King as the head of the "Church of England" instead of the Pope. It might seem like a small thing, but it's not. It's a sellout.

Isn't this the first step down a slippery slope? What about teachers who are lukewarm to begin with -- they'll look at this docuмent, and think the school is "mainstream liberal" and begin to act accordingly.

At first, it's a legal technicality. But as time goes on, more and more teachers will read it and take it seriously -- having failed to "get the memo" -- and the liberal snowball will continue to roll downhill faster and faster, picking up steam.

I suppose in some countries, which are as wretched as Great Britain, good Catholics are called upon by God to homeschool their children. Apparently even private school is out.

The same docuмent
In the same form
At numerous schools
In the United Kingdom
Of GB and Northern Ireland. And outlying territories.
Apologies for not producing the sources earlier, I had to attend to other things.
But yes, it's what's the UK has come to. They want too much control in many things and it scares me.

Only a cowardly or homo director of a Catholic school, would display a policy like that.  

That was fast. Taken down in under 9 hours.

I told you all many times before -- SSPX priests, priors, and officials all over the world have CathInfo as their homepage -- or at least on the main Bookmarks Bar (not in the Bookmarks Menu -- that's not accessible enough.) They keep an eagle eye on on their "enemy" at all times. And in this they do well: CathInfo is one of their largest public or online enemies. What I mean is, they can't keep an eye on Bp. Zendejas because he keeps a low (read: non-existent) profile on the Internet. They no doubt have a great interest in him, but all they can learn about him comes through CathInfo, the St. Dominic's Chapel website, etc.

I invite everyone to pay attention to the original post, at the bottom. There are THREE links. A graphic, and 2 links above that. One link is to the "Child Protection Policy" PDF. The other is a PDF printout of that school's links webpage yesterday morning. Both are archived for the permanent record, and will be around as long as CathInfo (did I say how permanent they were?)

EDIT: I've included most of the materials at the bottom of this post as well. I created a graphic, screenshot version of the Table of Links to St. Michael's School Policies page as well.

I told you all many times before -- SSPX priests, priors, and officials all over the world have CathInfo as their homepage -- or at least on the main Bookmarks Bar (not in the Bookmarks Menu -- that's not accessible enough.) They keep an eagle eye on on their "enemy" at all times. 

Sounds like the profile of an adulterer... always a watchman at the door.

This is not normal behavior of any upright citizen or organization. 

It demonstrates Menzingen has someone tracking Cathinfo 24/7.

Like the time someone from ECONE, SWITZERLAND was found browsing CathInfo -- and a very important page for the SSPX, at that...

https://www.cathinfo.com/sspx-resistance-news/interesting-coincidence/

 All the excuses ("all schools in the UK have to have this -- it's required by law!") fall apart 

I didn't read those links posted by the person who gave this lily-livered response - can't waste my time on things like that.
You will often hear people say things like that. "You have to apply to the government etc blah blah blah"
Besides policy is policy and law is another thing again (usually). It's been taken down so the bluff has been called, not by choice but by internal pressure and the attempt to appear clean. 
Good work, Matthew. Ever vigilant.

Before this was removed from the sspx website, how easy or difficult was it to locate these sinful behavior pages?  Did one have to dig much?  Or, was it in your face obvious?