Catholic Info

Traditional Catholic Faith => SSPX Resistance News => Topic started by: ImmaculateHeart on November 10, 2017, 03:52:09 PM

Title: Denial from our new priest to Macabees on cor-mariae
Post by: ImmaculateHeart on November 10, 2017, 03:52:09 PM
Cor-mariae.com has refused to publish the following, so it is published here:

 "Fr. Francis Mbadugha denies these accusations, as untrue and twisted. Has anyone heard from him ? He has forgiven this slander.  Pray for him"
Title: Re: Denial from our new priest to Macabees on cor-mariae
Post by: DZ PLEASE on November 10, 2017, 04:04:20 PM
Still no dog in this particular fight; don't really care for what should be obvious reasons.

That said, if Matthew is "going to great lengths to control the narrative", then he's either got a really convoluted narrative, or he's doing a really bad job of "controlling" it.

For crying out loud, he's barely ever "here".

That bit at least isn't only unjust, it's downright shady.

If he wanted to control the narrative so badly, he'd have scads of excuses to kick folks like me right off of the forum, and that's just one of many things that could be done.
Title: Re: Denial from our new priest to Macabees on cor-mariae
Post by: MaterDominici on November 10, 2017, 04:06:28 PM
Pfeifferville approval or not...
Would Father Mbadugha like to make an official ordination announcement?
Title: Re: Denial from our new priest to Macabees on cor-mariae
Post by: SeanJohnson on November 10, 2017, 04:38:11 PM
Pfeifferville approval or not...
Would Father Mbadugha like to make an official ordination announcement?
Good idea.
In the announcement, please include the following:
1) When, where, and by whom you were ordained;
2) Who Fr. Pfeiffer wanted to ordain you.
Title: Re: Denial from our new priest to Macabees on cor-mariae
Post by: ImmaculateHeart on November 10, 2017, 10:23:02 PM
Pfeifferville approval or not...
Would Father Mbadugha like to make an official ordination announcement?
Father, as seminarian, determined to leave OLMC (after several attempts). 
- He sought help, told some faithful, told some seminarians (so it was no secret) and told the spiritual director a week before the day he finally left. 
 - He never requested anything in secret from anyone, simply needed help to leave.
 - He never induced anyone to leave with him nor spoke ill of anyone.
- He was accepted by an old priest, Fr. Rossetti, who took care of him, examined him, and made the decision regarding his future.
-  He was ordained subdeacon and deacon on Sept.23 and Priest on Nov.4 at the chapel of the Rossetti Estate, PA, by Bishop Adamson. 
 Please Pray for him.
Title: Re: Denial from our new priest to Macabees on cor-mariae
Post by: Clavis David on November 11, 2017, 06:28:56 AM
Father, as seminarian, determined to leave OLMC (after several attempts).
- He sought help, told some faithful, told some seminarians (so it was no secret) and told the spiritual director a week before the day he finally left.
 - He never requested anything in secret from anyone, simply needed help to leave.
 - He never induced anyone to leave with him nor spoke ill of anyone.
- He was accepted by an old priest, Fr. Rossetti, who took care of him, examined him, and made the decision regarding his future.
-  He was ordained subdeacon and deacon on Sept.23 and Priest on Nov.4 at the chapel of the Rossetti Estate, PA, by Bishop Adamson.
 Please Pray for him.
I’ve heard that this seminarian, now priest, independently asked several bishops, including Bishop Zendejas, to ordain him and was rejected by all of them, except this ?sede Bishop Adamson, himself of dubious episcopal lineage, according to a previous post by Sean Johnson. 
Title: Re: Denial from our new priest to Macabees on cor-mariae
Post by: ImmaculateHeart on November 11, 2017, 10:44:02 AM
I’ve heard that this seminarian, now priest, independently asked several bishops, including Bishop Zendejas, to ordain him and was rejected by all of them, except this ?sede Bishop Adamson, himself of dubious episcopal lineage, according to a previous post by Sean Johnson.
False. He never asked anyone for ordination, never.  He refused it once and later rejected the offer of another. He sought help where he could continue his studies when he left OLMC.  Bp. Zendejas tried his best to help him, but he could not travel abroad again. The Priest who took him also tried to help him. He decided to accept the help the priest offered him and stayed with him. This is the truth.

OLMC wants to paint a scenario that everyone rejected him.  This is false. They should rather tell how much effort they put in regard to those who were willing to help the seminarian in order to frustrate  him after he left. This is the true picture.
Title: Re: Denial from our new priest to Macabees on cor-mariae
Post by: Fanny on November 11, 2017, 07:44:40 PM
Re:
http://cor-mariae.com/index.php?threads/is-cathinfo-a-subversive-website.4984/page-2

Cor-mariae.com has refused to publish the following, so it is published here:

  "Fr. Francis Mbadugha denies these accusations, as untrue and twisted. Has anyone heard from him ? He has forgiven this slander.  Pray for him"
Interestingly macabees says:
"Knowing there are two sides of a story..." yet cor-mariae refused to publish the other side.  So much for wanting to know both sides...  and they say CI is bad...
Title: Re: Denial from our new priest to Macabees on cor-mariae
Post by: ImmaculateHeart on November 12, 2017, 12:40:21 PM
This seminarian, now priest, left the Kentucky seminary  (whether he was expelled or left voluntarily - depending on what you prefer to believe because their is no proof of the manner in which he moved on, at least in this thread, at this time) felt he could not wait for validly consecrated bishop to ordain him?
He felt he had to quickly find someone? He supposedly left Kentucky in June. If both he and Bishop Zendejas were residing in the US, how could the Bishops travel plans be affected out of country? Bp. Zendejas tried his best to help him, but he could not travel abroad again.
Regardless, thing it’s for me, it seems this young man sought the Holy Priesthood too cheaply where he would seek ordination from a bishop of dubious episcopal lineage. And if he was advised by other bishops to do so, shame on them. I would not feel comfortable going to such a priest unless he were conditionally reordained!
So, Immaculate Heart, where is this Father going to be serving the faithful? At a sede chapel? One would assume so since it was a sede bishop who ordained him. Please enlighten us with the details since you are so intimately familiar with them.
- Father already bought his bus ticket to leave OLMC the weekend before he had the chance to speak with both OLMC priests on Wednesday, though he already told one of the priests a week before that he was not going to continue. The priests at OLMC know this fact to be true.
- Father never asked anyone for ordination. Bp. Zendejas did help a lot and considered many options which were not viable, the last being a possibility of father traveling to a distant country. This last option was very difficult especially due to father's agitated family at home. So father decided to remain with the priest who was taking care of him.
- The decision concerning father's ordination was made authoritatively by the priest taking care of him, after father had declined once saying he still had until June to finish his studies.
- Bishop Adamson is a thuc-line coming from Bishop Christian Datessen. Father is not sedevacantist.
- Father will go home early next year.

The purpose of these responses is not to hurt anyone, but to explain what happened.
Please pray for our new priest.  God bless him.
Title: Re: Denial from our new priest to Macabees on cor-mariae
Post by: MaterDominici on November 12, 2017, 12:48:08 PM
It sounds like more than one person was using Father's status as a foreigner to pressure him toward their own desires.
Title: Re: Denial from our new priest to Macabees on cor-mariae
Post by: Tradplorable on November 12, 2017, 02:00:36 PM
I've spent some time with dear Francis, and no matter what the trolls here at CI have to say about the methods of his ordination, he will make a very fine priest.
He's not terribly young either, which I see as a good thing, so all the naysayers should thank God that the world has another very holy priest!

God bless, Fr. Francis Mbaddugha!
Our Lady of Fatima - pray for us!
Title: Re: Denial from our new priest to Macabees on cor-mariae
Post by: ImmaculateHeart on November 12, 2017, 08:07:27 PM
The purpose of the response was to clarify the situation. It is not Father's intention to hurt anyone.  He would have kept silent if it had not been made public, and he informed OLMC beforehand.

God bless father mbadugha.
Title: Re: Denial from our new priest to Macabees on cor-mariae
Post by: Matthew on November 12, 2017, 11:09:25 PM
I've spent some time with dear Francis, and no matter what the trolls here at CI have to say about the methods of his ordination, he will make a very fine priest.
He's not terribly young either, which I see as a good thing, so all the naysayers should thank God that the world has another very holy priest!

God bless, Fr. Francis Mbaddugha!
Our Lady of Fatima - pray for us!

WTH are you talking about? What trolls? What naysayers? Is there another thread on this topic that I'm not aware of?
I've read this whole thread and I don't see what all the fuss is about.

Someone mused that the bishop who ordained him was probably Sedevacantist, but that's a very good assumption. That would be my assumption as well. 

My reasoning for jumping to that conclusion is quite solid:
If the bishop WERE NOT sedevacantist, and was a bishop holding the SSPX position, then why didn't he work with the SSPX over the years (helping with Confirmations, etc.) and why didn't he attend any SSPX functions over the years? Why have no well-informed SSPX parishioners heard of him?

There aren't that many major positions on the Crisis. I would know, I've been exploring the nuances of Trad-dom my whole life. There are only 4 types:

1. Complete Novus Ordo, possibly with a conservative bent
Those not approved by Rome, which break into two categories:
2. Sedevacantist
and 3. non-Sedevacantist (SSPX, Resistance)

4. And then you have actual Schismatic groups, which claim jurisdiction, etc. and this also includes Orthodox groups and Old Catholics.
Title: Re: Denial from our new priest to Macabees on cor-mariae
Post by: Matthew on November 12, 2017, 11:16:26 PM
Any bishop who claims to be non-sedevacantist, but who doesn't go begging hat-in-hand for a good status with Modernist Rome, should have been working with the SSPX (and today, with the Resistance) since they have 99.999% in common with them, just in virtue of their position on the Crisis.

Everything else is minor.
Title: Re: Denial from our new priest to Macabees on cor-mariae
Post by: Tradplorable on November 13, 2017, 10:13:31 AM
The apoplexy shown by those here over the method of his ordination is dumb, and shows a total lack of ability to focus on the bigger issue that the "Resistance" has a new priest and ought to be celebrated.
Title: Re: Denial from our new priest to Macabees on cor-mariae
Post by: Meg on November 13, 2017, 10:36:42 AM

- Bishop Adamson is a thuc-line coming from Bishop Christian Datessen. Father is not sedevacantist.
- Father will go home early next year.

The purpose of these responses is not to hurt anyone, but to explain what happened.
Please pray for our new priest.  God bless him.

Very glad to see that Father is not sedevacantist. That's a relief. 

It is mentioned above that he will go home early next year, which isn't very long from now. Where is home, exactly? How is his last name pronounced? 

I would think that this situation has been a bit stressful for him, but he seems to have persevered, in spite of obstacles. 
Title: Re: Denial from our new priest to Macabees on cor-mariae
Post by: Tradplorable on November 13, 2017, 10:41:41 AM
Very glad to see that Father is not sedevacantist. That's a relief.

It is mentioned above that he will go home early next year, which isn't very long from now. Where is home, exactly? How is his last name pronounced?

I would think that this situation has been a bit stressful for him, but he seems to have persevered, in spite of obstacles.
He is from Africa.
Title: Re: Denial from our new priest to Macabees on cor-mariae
Post by: JPaul on November 13, 2017, 10:45:22 AM
What a wasted clump of bandwidth.  This is all just another tempest in the neo-Traditional sectarian teapot, another chapter of heroes and villians..............
Title: Re: Denial from our new priest to Macabees on cor-mariae
Post by: Meg on November 13, 2017, 10:48:07 AM
He is from Africa.

Yes, I thought as much. He's probably African and has dark skin. Some trads are racist, and I hope that Father hasn't experienced a problem with racism, and that it hasn't been a factor. But one never knows. 

Will he try to serve the faithful in Africa, do you know? 
Title: Re: Denial from our new priest to Macabees on cor-mariae
Post by: hollingsworth on November 13, 2017, 11:02:32 AM

Quote
The apoplexy shown by those here over the method of his ordination is dumb, and shows a total lack of ability to focus on the bigger issue that the "Resistance" has a new priest and ought to be celebrated.

So, the "Resistance" has a new priest, does it?  This is a new priest who, apparently, received much of his training in KY.  Well then, thanks for the heads up.  I will avoid him like the plague should he come into our area, and I will advise other trads here to do likewise.

Quote
What a wasted clump of bandwidth.  This is all just another tempest in the neo-Traditional sectarian teapot, another chapter of heroes and villians..............
Totally agree.  But then again, CI is loaded with wasted clumps of bandwidth. IMO, many trads major in chasing their own tails.
Title: Re: Denial from our new priest to Macabees on cor-mariae
Post by: DZ PLEASE on November 13, 2017, 11:22:09 AM
People aren't "bandwidth", not even the most egregious heretic rival of Luther.
Title: Re: Denial from our new priest to Macabees on cor-mariae
Post by: hollingsworth on November 13, 2017, 11:41:50 AM

Quote
People aren't "bandwidth", not even the most egregious heretic rival of Luther.

Wow!  What a one-liner, full of essential wisdom. We'll copy it in large caps and put it on the refrigerator. :P
Title: Re: Denial from our new priest to Macabees on cor-mariae
Post by: DZ PLEASE on November 13, 2017, 11:54:05 AM
Wow!  What a one-liner, full of essential wisdom. We'll copy it in large caps and put it on the refrigerator.
Fine, then you won't mind being considered a non-person if it comes down to being put down as such; agreed?
Title: Re: Denial from our new priest to Macabees on cor-mariae
Post by: Meg on November 13, 2017, 11:56:10 AM
People aren't "bandwidth", not even the most egregious heretic rival of Luther.

I can't believe that I actually agree with you....for once. 

 :o
Title: Re: Denial from our new priest to Macabees on cor-mariae
Post by: Tradplorable on November 13, 2017, 12:34:09 PM
I can't believe that I actually agree with you....for once.

 :o
Me either. !
Title: Re: Denial from our new priest to Macabees on cor-mariae
Post by: Nooseph Polten on November 13, 2017, 01:45:56 PM
What a wasted clump of bandwidth.  
This sentence perfectly sums up your existence. 
Title: Re: Denial from our new priest to Macabees on cor-mariae
Post by: Clavis David on November 13, 2017, 05:41:02 PM
Getting back to the point of this thread and hoping for the end of certain posters acting like children (“wasted bandwidth”), one notes that the other forum doesn’t want to let this go:

http://cor-mariae.com/index.php?threads/is-cathinfo-a-subversive-website.4984/page-2#post-12239 (http://cor-mariae.com/index.php?threads/is-cathinfo-a-subversive-website.4984/page-2#post-12239)


“The dubious ordination of this expelled OLMC seminarian has brought to light several interesting facts. Both in truth and in spirit. And Cathinfo has devoted at least two threads over the last week to this particular ordination, once again leaving no opportunity to attack OLMC, unexplored. ....”
Title: Re: Denial from our new priest to Macabees on cor-mariae
Post by: Fanny on November 13, 2017, 10:16:06 PM
Getting back to the point of this thread and hoping for the end of certain posters acting like children (“wasted bandwidth”), one notes that the other forum doesn’t want to let this go:

http://cor-mariae.com/index.php?threads/is-cathinfo-a-subversive-website.4984/page-2#post-12239 (http://cor-mariae.com/index.php?threads/is-cathinfo-a-subversive-website.4984/page-2#post-12239)


“The dubious ordination of this expelled OLMC seminarian has brought to light several interesting facts. Both in truth and in spirit. And Cathinfo has devoted at least two threads over the last week to this particular ordination, once again leaving no opportunity to attack OLMC, unexplored. ....”
Interestingly, the other site:
1. Wont let anyone rebuke what they say
2. Has question marks all over his post.
It is clear the poster does not know what he is talking about.  
Title: Re: Denial from our new priest to Macabees on cor-mariae
Post by: Fanny on November 13, 2017, 10:36:20 PM
http://cor-mariae.com/index.php?threads/is-cathinfo-a-subversive-website.4984/page-2#post-12239

Martius, shame.  All lies, and both priests at OLMC know it.  Shame.
Title: Re: Denial from our new priest to Macabees on cor-mariae
Post by: ImmaculateHeart on November 14, 2017, 09:03:53 AM
Mr. Maccabees is free to continue what he is doing. Father has clarified only what is necessary, not the whole story. The whole truth is known to God, who knows all things and his conscience bears him witness, that: 
1. Farher always told the priests of his intentions. There are reasons why he left when he did, mostly known to the priests, one being his family. 
2. He never asked anyone for orders including the Bishop who ordained him nor made any form of pledge to anyone.
 3. He was ordained in accordance with the will and at the time the priest who took charge of him decided.

  - Maccabees appears to know father, but does not consider it important to listen to the other side, but rather makes an analysis precisely on the premise he denies; ie that father never sought orders by himself. This is untrue.
 - How can anyone ask to leave the seminary with the right to return ? Where does this happen ?
- His decision to leave OLMC does not mean disobedience, nor him seeking anything. This is unfounded. He has his reasons which I'm sure Maccabees will not like to hear.
 The priest who made the decisions concerning father and did all the work in regard to his future knows all that. 
On the contrary, father contacted Bp. Zendejas only after he left, who tried to help him find a solution to his situation. Finally, he decided to remain with the priest who took him in and was also willing to help him. This is the truth. 

- He threatened no one, but saddened by the falsifications after months of suffering from what OLMC tried to do to him, he stated he would be obliged to give the full account of his stay at OLMC.

Bishop Merrill Adamson, is a thuc line Bishop who was consecreted by Bishop José Urbina Anzar, who was consecrated by José Romon Lopez Gaston, himself a thuc bishop through Bishop Christian Datessen, consecrated conditionally by Archbishop Thuc.
Title: Re: Denial from our new priest to Macabees on cor-mariae
Post by: ImmaculateHeart on November 14, 2017, 12:31:21 PM
Nobody realizes that its uncanonical to reveal in  public, affairs of the internal forum of seminary life, as OLMC has done. Its up to them to deny anything untrue publicly said about them, but not reveal things about seminarians.
Title: Re: Denial from our new priest to Macabees on cor-mariae
Post by: Neil Obstat on November 14, 2017, 09:53:10 PM
Mr. Maccabees is free to continue what he is doing. Father has clarified only what is necessary, not the whole story. The whole truth is known to God, who knows all things and his conscience bears him witness, that:
1. Farher always told the priests of his intentions. There are reasons why he left when he did, mostly known to the priests, one being his family.
2. He never asked anyone for orders including the Bishop who ordained him nor made any form of pledge to anyone.
 3. He was ordained in accordance with the will and at the time the priest who took charge of him decided.

  - Maccabees appears to know father, but does not consider it important to listen to the other side, but rather makes an analysis precisely on the premise he denies; ie that father never sought orders by himself. This is untrue.
 - How can anyone ask to leave the seminary with the right to return ? Where does this happen ?
- His decision to leave OLMC does not mean disobedience, nor him seeking anything. This is unfounded. He has his reasons which I'm sure Maccabees will not like to hear.
 The priest who made the decisions concerning father and did all the work in regard to his future knows all that.
On the contrary, father contacted Bp. Zendejas only after he left, who tried to help him find a solution to his situation. Finally, he decided to remain with the priest who took him in and was also willing to help him. This is the truth.

- He threatened no one, but saddened by the falsifications after months of suffering from what OLMC tried to do to him, he stated he would be obliged to give the full account of his stay at OLMC.

Bishop Merrill Adamson, is a thuc line Bishop who was consecreted by Bishop José Urbina Anzar, who was consecrated by José Romon Lopez Gaston, himself a thuc bishop through Bishop Christian Datessen, consecrated conditionally by Archbishop Thuc.
.
So that's your version.............
.
Here is the "Martius" version (http://cor-mariae.com/index.php?threads/is-cathinfo-a-subversive-website.4984/page-2) -- seminarian Mbadugha has so far abandoned a seminary at least 4 times:
.
Quote
The dubious ordination of this expelled OLMC seminarian has brought to light several interesting facts. Both in truth and in spirit...here is what we do know (my comments in red):
.
~ Francis Mbadugha was a seminarian at OLMC for ?three years after leaving the SSPX seminary in Australia - seeing the liberalism there and wanted to come to OLMC for a better formation. He was never forced or coerced into attending OLMC. He was advised by a priest outside of OLMC to seek admission to that seminary as the best place to complete is formation for the priesthood that was free of the contaminants of liberalism and ecuмenism.
.
~Francis decided to leave OLMC on three separate occasions and each time asked Frs. Pfeiffer and Hewko if he could come back - giving the Fathers concern for his formation/stability. In order to afford him every opportunity to improve himself, he was accepted back every time.

~Fr. Pfeiffer told Francis early in 2017 that he needed one more year of seminary and then come the end of the spring of 2018, his seminary formation would be completed.
.
~Francis was not content with this plan. He decided/felt he was ready in 2017 for the priesthood. He searched on his own/secretly for a bishop to ordain him this year. When his maneuvers came to light a few months ago, ?June, the Fathers ended up expelling Francis from the OLMC seminary. Fr. Hewko noted that no matter where you are, much less a seminary, when you operate in the darkness and not in the light, its a sign that you are not acting according to God’s will but your own.
.
~At some point after his expulsion, Francis then threatened to publish some kind of expose against OLMC. In a clear effort at retaliation, for what...not listening to Francis insisting he was ready for the priesthood, Francis threatened the priests who took him in with revenge. He is clearly forgetting the poor value of retaliatory 'exposes'. 
.
Of ill-temper there are three kinds: irascibility, bitterness, sullenness. It belongs to the ill-tempered man to be unable to bear either small slights or defeats but to be given to retaliation and revenge, and easily moved to anger by any chance deed or word. Ill-temper is accompanied by excitability of character, instability, bitter speech, and liability to take offence at trifles and to feel these feelings quickly and on slight occasions. - Aristotle (http://www.azquotes.com/author/524-Aristotle)
.
While he was a seminarian at OLMC, he was fine with whatever he now threatens to expose. But since he was not able to get his own way, now he wishes to publicly punish those who took him in. Again, as noted above: "Francis was treated by Padre Pfeiffer and Padre Hewko with extreme Charity and given freely much, much more than anyone else has ever given him..."
.
.
~Francis was in communication with several bishops, including Bishop Zendejas this year. Not one of them except this sedevacantist bishop wanted to ordain him. Interestingly enough, CI is rejoicing over this ordination as some sort of blow to OLMC. Unfortunately, Francis has become a pawn for the false resistance. As a means to retaliate in their own way against OLMC and continue to attack and lash out at Frs. Pfeiffer and Hewkowho have stood up for the truth clearly and consistently. 
.
~Francis was ordained a priest on November 4th of this year by a Bishop ?Merrill Adamson -reportedly sedevacantist. Even SJ on CI noted that this Bishop Adamson has questionable sedevacantist episcopal lineage. Which of course puts into doubt the validity of Francis’ ordination.
.
It causes some amazement that there is no indignation on a supposedly Catholic site like CI at learning of a seminarian who took it upon himself to operate outside the framework of the Church to seek out a bishop, unbeknownst to his superiors, when he was not ready. To take it upon himself to get what he wanted, when he wanted it. 
.
And who it was who did this is nearly irrelevant. It was not that Francis is such a bad person. Most who met him, liked him. But that he persisted in disobedience to his chosen and lawful superiors, non serviam, and sought his own pleasure in the matter of his priestly ordination, he has been justly repaid - the only bishop that he could find has a very doubtful episcopal consecration, thus in the minds of most people, his own ordination is in grave doubt. "Revenge is mine, and I will repay them in due time, that their foot may slide..." Deuteronomy 32:35 
.
Truly, this was a Pyrrhic victory for poor Francis. He got his 'ordination', but at what cost?
.
Let us pray for poor Francis, that he may return to the light of God's guidance and not seek his own. 'There but for the grace of God go I.'



Last edited: Yesterday at 7:29 AM

Martius (http://cor-mariae.com/index.php?members/martius.274/)Yesterday at 6:28 AM (http://cor-mariae.com/index.php?threads/is-cathinfo-a-subversive-website.4984/page-2#post-12237)
#29 (http://cor-mariae.com/index.php?threads/is-cathinfo-a-subversive-website.4984/page-2#post-12237)

.
For what it's worth, posts above from ImmaculateHeart didn't make sense to me until I read this, because of it giving incomplete descriptions of an event and then commenting on it.
.
Title: Re: Denial from our new priest to Macabees on cor-mariae
Post by: ImmaculateHeart on November 14, 2017, 09:58:29 PM
Mr. Martius is free to continue what he is doing. Father has clarified only what is necessary, not the whole story. The whole truth is known to God, who knows all things.
Title: Re: Denial from our new priest to Macabees on cor-mariae
Post by: Neil Obstat on November 14, 2017, 10:10:21 PM
Nobody realizes that its [it's] uncanonical to reveal in  public, affairs of the internal forum of seminary life, as OLMC has done. Its [It's] up to them to deny anything untrue publicly said about them, but not reveal things about seminarians.
.
So are you going to be one of those members who keeps posting the same paragraph including typos, on multiple threads (https://www.cathinfo.com/sspx-resistance-news/ex-olmc-seminarian-ordained/msg579105/#msg579105)? 
.
If so, you can figure your days will be numbered accordingly.
.
Nobody realizes that its [it's] uncanonical to reveal in  public, affairs of the internal forum of seminary life, as OLMC has done. Its [It's] up to them to deny anything untrue publicly said about them, but not reveal things about seminarians.
.
It's is a conjunction of It and is, whereas its is a singular neuter possessive pronoun.
.
Title: Re: Denial from our new priest to Macabees on cor-mariae
Post by: Neil Obstat on November 14, 2017, 10:12:11 PM
Mr. Martius is free to continue what he is doing. Father has clarified only what is necessary, not the whole story. The whole truth is known to God, who knows all things.
.
Actually, that is almost identical to your post on the other thread:
.
Mr. Maccabees is free to continue what he is doing. Father has clarified only what is necessary, not the whole story. The whole truth is known to God, who knows all things and his conscience bears him witness, that:
1. Father always told the priests of his intentions. There are reasons why he left when he did, mostly known to the priests, one being his family.
2. He never asked anyone for orders including the Bishop who ordained him nor made any form of pledge to anyone.
3. He was ordained in accordance with the will and at the time the priest who took charge of him decided.

- Maccabees appears to know father, but does not consider it important to listen to the other side, but rather makes an analysis precisely on the premise he denies; ie that father never sought orders by himself. This is untrue.
- How can anyone ask to leave the seminary with the right to return ? Where does this happen ?
- His decision to leave OLMC does not mean disobedience, nor him seeking anything. This is unfounded. He has his reasons which I'm sure Maccabees will not like to hear.
The priest who made the decisions concerning father and did all the work in regard to his future knows all that.
On the contrary, father contacted Bp. Zendejas only after he left, who tried to help him find a solution to his situation. Finally, he decided to remain with the priest who took him in and was also willing to help him. This is the truth.

- He threatened no one, but saddened by the falsifications after months of suffering from what OLMC tried to do to him, he stated he would be obliged to give the full account of his stay at OLMC.

Bishop Merrill Adamson, is a thuc line Bishop who was consecreted by Bishop José Urbina Anzar, who was consecrated by José Romon Lopez Gaston, himself a thuc bishop through Bishop Christian Datessen, consecrated conditionally by Archbishop Thuc.
.
Are you running off copies of the same message on multiple forums?
.
Maybe you're a robot!!  :o
Title: Re: Denial from our new priest to Macabees on cor-mariae
Post by: Neil Obstat on November 14, 2017, 10:23:04 PM
Nobody realizes that its uncanonical to reveal in  public, affairs of the internal forum of seminary life, as OLMC has done. Its up to them to deny anything untrue publicly said about them, but not reveal things about seminarians.
.
Are you attempting to start the same conversation on two different threads? You already got several responses to this one!
.
Nobody realizes that its uncanonical to reveal in  public, affairs of the internal forum of seminary life, as OLMC has done. Its up to them to deny anything untrue publicly said about them, but not reveal things about seminarians.
.
Should I go ahead and post all the replies over here, again? Or are we going to copy your responses to the other thread?
.
Title: Re: Denial from our new priest to Macabees on cor-mariae
Post by: Fanny on November 14, 2017, 10:35:39 PM

It's is a conjunction of It and is, whereas its is a singular neuter possessive pronoun.
.

Let it be.