Check out here for a translation and summary in pdf file format:
http://cathinfo-warning-pornography!/Ignis_Ardens/index.php?showtopic=10068&st=0&#last
Bad translation!!!
Examples:
It is as if the time of Arianism had been told, now you agree with all that think the Arian bishops.
One may wonder if we did not want to Rome, thereby correcting the text of the Protocol.
They are likely to sign these docuмents to the seminarians of the Fraternity of St. Peter before their ordination and priests of the Fraternity, which will then be obliged to make an official act of rallying to the conciliar Church.
Do you think the situation has deteriorated further since you had before-the sacred-initiated conversations that led to the drafting of the Protocol of 5 May 1988?
Following the proposal Roman, the real question, crucial, is: should we, can we, we take the path of a "possible" agreement first practice?
The problem is not the subjective intentions, but objective, clear, the observation that we have just made their desire:
Therefore what can be appears as a concession is actually a ploy to reach away from us as possible to the faithful.
How then do not go against the defense and public confession of faith, against the public need protection the faithful and the Church?
We can not do it either ignores the context, that is to say, events and constant teachings in the life of the Church today: repeated visits to Protestant churches and ѕуηαgσgυєs, beatification (soon to be canonized) by Jean Paul II, III Sitting, preaching time and inconvenience of religious freedom, and a long etcetera.
Please pass the asprin.