Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Bishop Fellay on Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ in the Vatican  (Read 3595 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline ServusSpiritusSancti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8212
  • Reputation: +7173/-7
  • Gender: Male
Bishop Fellay on Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ in the Vatican
« Reply #15 on: January 17, 2013, 12:19:35 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: trento
    Well, the reason I said it was exaggerated was because someone earlier said both Bishop Fellay AND the Society were pretty quiet about it. Fr. de Cacqueray's article was excellent in itself in my opinion, thus it is to Fr. de Cacqueray's credit that even other large Districts of the Society prefer to use that article than pen their own articles. I also recalled that it was printed out and distributed at the chapel I visited. Even if nobody here trusts Bishop Fellay, there are still many other priests and superiors of the Society fighting the good fight, and I will give credit where credit is due instead of tarring every priest in the Society with the same brush.


    Yes, the Society was generally quiet about it, more quiet about it than they should have been, that is. This is what Fr. Ringrose said as well.

    It's true that there are still priests in the Society "fighting the good fight", but that does not change the fact that the Society - and Bishop Fellay in particular - should have been more outspoken.
    Please ignore ALL of my posts. I was naive during my time posting on this forum and didn’t know any better. I retract and deeply regret any and all uncharitable or erroneous statements I ever made here.


    Offline John Grace

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5521
    • Reputation: +121/-6
    • Gender: Male
    Bishop Fellay on Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ in the Vatican
    « Reply #16 on: January 17, 2013, 01:05:04 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote
    It's actually quite pathetic.


    Indeed. It's quite laughable that 'trento' makes an appearance. A lackey for Bishop Fellay.


    Offline John Grace

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5521
    • Reputation: +121/-6
    • Gender: Male
    Bishop Fellay on Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ in the Vatican
    « Reply #17 on: January 17, 2013, 01:16:20 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Trento,

    I have a gift for you.Here are your 30 pieces. Notwithstanding how excellently Incred put it you out to be ashamed to defend Bishop Fellay.


    Offline John Grace

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5521
    • Reputation: +121/-6
    • Gender: Male
    Bishop Fellay on Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ in the Vatican
    « Reply #18 on: January 17, 2013, 01:19:02 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Incredulous
    There was an SSPX Priest's Conference in Winona, in early Spring of 2009.

    This is where Bp Fellay gave everyone their "talking points", to establish their public position on the "+Williamson αnтι-ѕємιтє campaign".

    Oh, how horrible it was!  
    Msgr. Williamson was on the front page of every European newspaper after the tribe organized to smear him.  Poor Msgr. Fellay... he was so persecuted.

    This is when Msgr. Fellay came up with the SSPX PR schtik:

    " The SSPX talks about nothing other than the Faith and morals"

    There was more "holy" PR schtik: "The SSPX will convert Rome with the Faith",
    His Excellency's analogy was that the SSPX was akin to David slinging the stone of the Faith at Goliath.


    Of course, this was before anyone knew that Msgr. Fellay had already hired zionist Dr. Maxie, or accepted the Gutman/Rothchilds trust fund.

    Of course Dr. Maxie and the 80million Euros puts the SSPX "Morals" in question ... don't they?

    Bottom line, we were given the grace to see right through  the fraud.

    It proves either Msgr. Fellay and Dr. Maxie are PR amateurs and/or the Blessed Mother is looking after the SSPX-Resistance.


    Well stated, Incredulous. That 'trento' should be ashamed of himself to defend Bishop Fellay.

    Offline ServusSpiritusSancti

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8212
    • Reputation: +7173/-7
    • Gender: Male
    Bishop Fellay on Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ in the Vatican
    « Reply #19 on: January 17, 2013, 02:40:13 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • John Grace is right, anyone who defends Bishop Fellay ought to be ashamed.
    Please ignore ALL of my posts. I was naive during my time posting on this forum and didn’t know any better. I retract and deeply regret any and all uncharitable or erroneous statements I ever made here.


    Offline John Grace

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5521
    • Reputation: +121/-6
    • Gender: Male
    Bishop Fellay on Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ in the Vatican
    « Reply #20 on: January 17, 2013, 02:59:02 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: ServusSpiritusSancti
    John Grace is right, anyone who defends Bishop Fellay ought to be ashamed.


    If they have any shame or principle. Is 'trento' a Zionist or has he just ignored the snippet from Incredulous. Thumb me down all you like but I won't be defending Bishop Bernard Fellay or his gang.

    Offline trento

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 773
    • Reputation: +206/-136
    • Gender: Male
    Bishop Fellay on Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ in the Vatican
    « Reply #21 on: January 18, 2013, 08:10:30 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • All I'm saying is Bishop Fellay != SSPX and SSPX != Bishop Fellay. Gee whiz...