Author Topic: To An Idiot Calling Himself "Machabees"  (Read 1471 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline SeanJohnson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6946
  • Reputation: +5297/-1878
  • Gender: Male
To An Idiot Calling Himself "Machabees"
« on: September 04, 2017, 06:26:49 PM »
  • Thanks!6
  • No Thanks!0
  • Dear Machabees-

    I happened to chance across your recent post titled "Poor Mr. G" while doing research for an article, and was amazed to see you telling the world that "Mr. G is Sean Johnson" (http://cor-mariae.com/index.php?threads/poor-mr-g.6180/#post-11563).

    Now, I have no idea who "Mr. G" is, but if his writings and views can be mistaken for mine, I'm sure it is no insult.

    What is insulting (and what reflects very poorly not only on your character, but also on your quality of judgment) is that you yourself acknowledge that I never post anonymously (and haven't since April/2013, for the reason you adduce).

    Yet, that knowledge did not impede you from maligning my honor to the world, based on your own poor and mistaken guesswork.

    I want to tell you a little story now, to make you understand just how stupid your claim is; a story which is necessary now, since the SSPX priests and laity who monitor this site will be quite surprised to see me posting here:

    You may remember that shortly before I stopped posting here, I had for some time been discussing the problem of rash judgment in Resistance polemics (of which you are the poster boy, par excellence).  I had been quite down on myself for having thought that I myself had slid into that sin on a few occasions, and in that contrite state, confessed the problem.

    I myself offered to the priest in the confessional that perhaps he should ban me from posting on Cathinfo, as I did not trust myself that I would not eventually fall into recidivism in this regard.

    The priest took me up on my proposition, and took it a step further, banning me from even logging in to CI.

    That was three years ago, this past Ascension Thursday (and if posting histories are still viewable on this new CI format, you will see I made no posts since that time).

    True, from time to time, I submitted articles to Matthew if I thought something was important enough, thereby complying with the letter of the law (even if touching a gray area regarding its "spirit").

    In any case, I am sure Matthew possesses some admin tools which can prove I am not "Mr. G" if he has the inclination.

    But as regards you, I get the impression that you do not give a damn about rash judgment; I even wonder whether you care about your own salvation, seeing the irresponsible way you conduct yourself.

    That said, I am glad you are out there, in order that you can draw other like-minded souls to your caricature of Resistance, like flies to dung, in order that we don't have to deal with them in the sane Resistance.

    I have watched/read you act a fool now for several years.  

    Do you not know this is your reputation?

    With the grammar of a 6 year-old Yoda, your posted gibberish would have inhibited a wiser man from saying anything at all in public.

    But not you.

    Well, no more point wasting energy on you.

    Semper Idem,
    Sean Johnson

    PS: In case you should start to think I had broken my penance in order to come back on Cathinfo to address you (which would have been a perfectly predictable rash judgment on your part, but do you REALLY think I would be willing to go to purgatory just to argue with you?), know that I explained both the reason for the penance I was given, and the rigor with which I have observed it since it began, to another priest, and taking the responsibility upon himself, he has judged the penance satisfied.
    Romans 5:20 "But where sin increased, grace abounded all the more."

    -I retract any and all statements I have made that are incongruent with the True Faith, and apologize for ever having made them-

    Offline Mr G

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1203
    • Reputation: +706/-67
    • Gender: Male
    Re: To An Idiot Calling Himself "Machabees"
    « Reply #1 on: September 05, 2017, 08:48:31 AM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!0
  • People such as "Machabees" hurt their own cause and the cause of Fr. Pfeiffer, as it makes them seem like irrational reactionaries when they toss out these wild accusations and over-blown suspicions.

    It is interesting I got attached just for posting articles from Sean Johnson's website.  I thought they (Sean's articles) were news worthy stories so I posted them. It is as simple as that! I also post articles from Dr. Peter Chojnowski, so I am Dr. Chojnowski also?

    So "Machabees", rather than make wild assumptions and attacks, why don't you just ask me directly if there I something you want discuss that you disagree with? If you believe me to be "poor" then help me out of my "poverty", pray for me and have your friends and family to pray for me. I will include you in my rosary today Mr. Machabees, may Our Lord grant you Peace of soul and may Our Lady protect you and your family.





    Offline A Resistor

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 3
    • Reputation: +0/-1
    • Gender: Male
    Re: To An Idiot Calling Himself "Machabees"
    « Reply #2 on: September 05, 2017, 11:24:44 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Machabees' comments in red:



    Dear Machabees-

    I happened to chance across your recent post titled "Poor Mr. G" while doing research for an article, and was amazed to see you telling the world that "Mr. G is Sean Johnson" (http://cor-mariae.com/index.php?threads/poor-mr-g.6180/#post-11563).

    Now, I have no idea who "Mr. G" is, but if his writings and views can be mistaken for mine, I'm sure it is no insult. I was informed from various sources, over three weeks, this being the case, no insult nor false interpretation. When I checked and sourced “Mr G’s” own archives, indeed there is a striking resemblance between Mr G and you Sean Johnson; even the immature comebacks are your style especially the mannerism of all things Sean Johnson.

    What is insulting (and what reflects very poorly not only on your character, but also on your quality of judgment) is that you yourself acknowledge that I never post anonymously (and haven't since April/2013, for the reason you adduce). You are wrong, again. I did not say “never” as this reflects poorly on your own “honor and character”. Have you forgotten or trying to deceive us too with your recent anonymous name on the now defunct ABLF3 you went under as aka “Br. Athanasius” exploiting your third order Dominican name (for which the Avrille Dominicans have admonished any of their members to do so), and at present, I do not remember if you added another aka on ABLF3 right before you became a second administrator using your own name. All this doesn’t matter right? I’ll let you explain that one.
     
     Be assured, I do not follow you nor even have a bookmark for your website. I only get updates every once and a while in emails of your false branding and hyperbole articles trying to hold up the false resistance; which too is defunct. Not interested.


    Yet, that knowledge did not impede you from maligning my honor to the world, based on your own poor and mistaken guesswork.

    I want to tell you a little story now, to make you understand just how stupid your claim is; a story which is necessary now, since the SSPX priests and laity who monitor this site will be quite surprised to see me posting here:

    You may remember that shortly before I stopped posting here, I had for some time been discussing the problem of rash judgment in Resistance polemics (of which you are the poster boy, par excellence). I had been quite down on myself for having thought that I myself had slid into that sin on a few occasions, and in that contrite state, confessed the problem.

    I myself offered to the priest in the confessional that perhaps he should ban me from posting on Cathinfo, as I did not trust myself that I would not eventually fall into recidivism in this regard.

    The priest took me up on my proposition, and took it a step further, banning me from even logging in to CI.

    That was three years ago, this past Ascension Thursday (and if posting histories are still viewable on this new CI format, you will see I made no posts since that time).

    True, from time to time, I submitted articles to Matthew if I thought something was important enough, thereby complying with the letter of the law (even if touching a gray area regarding its "spirit"). Ah there we have the BUT where you play off on Cathinfo to SUBMIT, MONITOR, and have Matthew EDIT for you (like a secretary) your regular “articles” from YOURSELF to contain YOUR brand on YOUR website as some kind of source to go to and build with readership aligning with and pomping the defunct ipsaconteret.com, defunct ABLF3, and on the way defunct Huge Akins site; including, many articles you had posted on Cathinfo from your first defunct website, second defunct website, and now your third resurrection of a new branded-website. Who needs Cathinfo anymore when you have your own website - Wink Piggybacking and usury are strange things. If not both of you benefit when Matthew has nothing else to offer his advertisers but sensational content regurgitating - BW good; Fr. Pfeiffer bad - for ratings. And Branding is not a part of this? Not falling in that trap.
     
     By the way, what is the different of not falling into "recidivism" you say of yourself posting on Cathinfo any different of you falling into the ill "recidivism" on other websites you are a member of and carry on in the same manner on your "own" website? Who is watching the fox...? So it is not my or our "stupid" claim; is it? Please, no need for false humility! As I recall, when you stated this back then, you said the priest told you to STOP all posts and internet activity...your archives will prove this. But why waste time on important details...huh? Like you said, there is the letter and the spirit of it.


    In any case, I am sure Matthew possesses some admin tools which can prove I am not "Mr. G" if he has the inclination.

    But as regards you, I get the impression that you do not give a damn about rash judgment; I even wonder whether you care about your own salvation, seeing the irresponsible way you conduct yourself.

    That said, I am glad you are out there, in order that you can draw other like-minded souls to your caricature of Resistance, like flies to dung, in order that we don't have to deal with them in the sane Resistance.

    I have watched/read you act a fool now for several years. Yes, we are aware you regularly visit Cor-Mariae as with Samuel, your new partner for all things Bishop Williamson in the false resistance. Please read on, the contents on Cor-Mariae are quite shocking in nature disclosing the quotes of the neo-tradition Bishop Fellay and the false resistance promote.
     
     I’m informed you follow it so much that you copy some of our content for your website. But come on…let’s not lower oneself to name calling your neighbor. Please speak to a priest about that too…providing real content without conflating it is better than relying on your sullied adjectives to describe a person. Just saying.


    Do you not know this is your reputation?

    With the grammar of a 6 year-old Yoda, your posted gibberish would have inhibited a wiser man from saying anything at all in public.

    But not you. Hmm, I’ll take my natural self and all God sees of me, and not you? Perhaps a little memory can serve you well. Do you not remember being banned from many websites for your vulgar "catholic" mannerism…over many years...from many people trying to help you in the “same”? Glass houses are...(you know the rest).

    Well, no more point wasting energy on you.

    Semper Idem,

    Sean Johnson

    PS: In case you should start to think I had broken my penance in order to come back on Cathinfo to address you (which would have been a perfectly predictable rash judgment on your part, but do you REALLY think I would be willing to go to purgatory just to argue with you?), know that I explained both the reason for the penance I was given, and the rigor with which I have observed it since it began, to another priest, and taking the responsibility upon himself, he has judged the penance satisfied.

    Romans 5:20 "But where sin increased, grace abounded all the more." .

    -I retract any and all statements I have made that are incongruent with the True Faith, and apologize for ever having made them- PS: Having this statement in your avatar is rather hypocritical isn’t it? This mental gymnastic is like giving a feigned “permission” for yourself to say whatever you want, however you want, as you do,…giving a basis of incongruity.
     
     By the way, it is noticed you have not addressed the point and content of the said post ("Poor Mr G") calling out the fraud you, Sean Johnson, are doing trying to exploit the Morgon Capuchin's "study" as part of your ill framed "neo-resistance". I'll inform you the Capuchins also came out and denounced such an exploitation. So the aka “Mr G” is only a tooled distraction for you. But what does that matter. Your aim has always been to deflect what is zeroed in on the fraud you present; sorry it is uncomfortable for you. But you made the offensive act against the faith and we will always defend Her honor.
     
     This is a doctrinal problem; not a personal problem you reduce it to.
     
     Hoping for an honest discourse someday.
     
     
     God bless,
     
     Machabees

    Offline A Resistor

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 3
    • Reputation: +0/-1
    • Gender: Male
    Re: To An Idiot Calling Himself "Machabees"
    « Reply #3 on: September 05, 2017, 11:56:20 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Not to mention more fake news:

    Quote from: SeanJohnson
    Fr. David Aldalur (SSPX) to Join the Resistance on Sept. 8

    Morgon seems to be quite a popular place for SSPX refugees: Fr. Paul Morgan, Fr. Regis de Cacqueray, and now Fr. David Aldalur are all gathered there, and not without reason ...

    First, the Morgon Capuchins are not in the Resistance, as mentioned in another thread, they are still affiliated with the SSPX. Second, Fr. Morgan has not join the Capuchins, he may have spend a few days with them, but he has not joined the order.

    Offline SeanJohnson

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6946
    • Reputation: +5297/-1878
    • Gender: Male
    Re: To An Idiot Calling Himself "Machabees"
    « Reply #4 on: September 06, 2017, 06:57:50 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Not to mention more fake news:

    First, the Morgon Capuchins are not in the Resistance, as mentioned in another thread, they are still affiliated with the SSPX. Second, Fr. Morgan has not join the Capuchins, he may have spend a few days with them, but he has not joined the order.
    Yoda-
    Please quote the part in the sentence you snipped where I say Fr. Paul Morgan has "joined Morgon."
    I know the English language has always presented you with challenges, but maybe with the help of your friends, you can all study that sentence, and look up the difference between the words "gathered" and "join."
    This is typical of the slop that passes for Jonestown apologetics (in fact, this kind of slop is a prerequisite for arriving in Jonestown).
    Romans 5:20 "But where sin increased, grace abounded all the more."

    -I retract any and all statements I have made that are incongruent with the True Faith, and apologize for ever having made them-


    Offline SeanJohnson

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6946
    • Reputation: +5297/-1878
    • Gender: Male
    Re: To An Idiot Calling Himself "Machabees"
    « Reply #5 on: September 06, 2017, 07:46:23 AM »
  • Thanks!3
  • No Thanks!0
  • 1) "I was informed by various sources," blah, blah.  Your "sources" are obviously idiots, since your "sources" obviously operate on the same rroneous guesswork (i.e., rash judgment) as you do.  "Mr. G" had already posted his response, demonstrating we are not the same person, and you follow it with "my sources" and note the similarity of writing style?  After we have both denied it?  I would say you have only dug your hole deeper: persisting in error and rash judgment even in the face of prima facie proof to the contrary.  That is beiutiful Pfeifferian crimethink.

    2) Regarding posting on ABLF3 under my former religious name "Br. Athanasius," can you produce the part where I "tried to deceive" you about it?  And as for my previous blog platforms (which I often linked to in ABLF3 posts), all the articles I signed/posted as Br. Athanasius still carried the name "Sean Johnson" in the blog article header or footer.  

    3) You "don't follow me?"  You're kidding right?  You follow me as closely as Menzingen's watchdogs; you know what I say within a couple hours of saying it.  I would say you are one of my most loyal readers! :D

    4) You next make a long rambling rant that I am going to have to find a Hmong pre-schooler to explain to me; something about, well, I'm not sure.  Having Matthew post articles?  Umm, I believe I already covered that in my OP.  

    5) You "are informed I follow Cor Marie so much..."  Are those the same skilled "informers" who "inform" you that "Mr. G" and Sean Johnson are the same person?  Nevertheless: Guilty as charged!  I do enjoy tuning into Cor Maria, for the same reasons I enjoy tuning in to Traditio: There is very little to be taken seriously on either forum, and nobody really seeking serious instruction or information would depend on either.  But for entertainment purposes, it is quite enjoyable!  What will they come up with next about Bishop Williamson?  Wait a minute: my sources are informing me that you might be "Fr. Moderator!"  I argue against them: Fr. Moderator is much too eloquent in comparison!

    6) Do I remember being banned from several websites?  Angelqueen and ABLF2.1 (Is that still a forum?)  Yep, sure do.  But that is your response to me telling you that you write like a babbling idiot, and would do yourself (and Boston) a service by canceling your internet service?

    7) Your final comment goes off the gibberish charts into pure unintelligibility, but there is something mixed in about the Capuchins opposing the internet publication of their study?  The study is over a year old, and was intended for the orientation of their religious, oblates, tertiaries, and friends.  If they regret it appearing on the internet, it is not because they abjure the positions contained within it (any more than the Dominicans of Avrille regretted the "Steffeshausen Memorandum" from appearing on the internet, which was likewise drafted for the orientation of their people.  Only a Jonestown zealot would try to interpret that as Morgon walking back on their own principles.  But hey, they haven't bowed down to Fr. Pfeiffer yet, and until/unless they do, they are......"fake."  Right?

    But a broken clock is right twice/day, and consequently I do agree with you on one point: It is not clear to me how Morgon could object to the publication of this document, when the document itself exclaims:

    "Confirmation makes us soldiers of Christ: Every Christian must be ready to expose himself to defend the faith. And the sacerdotal character attached to the mission of the Church gives priests the sacred duty of preaching and defending it publicly by combating error.

    We are in the Church militant, attacked on all sides by error. To no longer publicly raise a voice against it is to become its accomplice.""
    Romans 5:20 "But where sin increased, grace abounded all the more."

    -I retract any and all statements I have made that are incongruent with the True Faith, and apologize for ever having made them-

    Offline SeanJohnson

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6946
    • Reputation: +5297/-1878
    • Gender: Male
    Re: To An Idiot Calling Himself "Machabees"
    « Reply #6 on: September 06, 2017, 01:55:14 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Machabees has now gone completely apoplectic, unleashing an incomprehensible barrage, the opening sentence of which is a new world-record 108 words!

    http://cor-mariae.com/index.php?threads/poor-mr-g.6180/#post-11593

    :popcorn:
    Romans 5:20 "But where sin increased, grace abounded all the more."

    -I retract any and all statements I have made that are incongruent with the True Faith, and apologize for ever having made them-

    Offline Mithrandylan

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3789
    • Reputation: +4339/-376
    • Gender: Male
      • The Trad Forum
    Re: To An Idiot Calling Himself "Machabees"
    « Reply #7 on: September 06, 2017, 05:43:10 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Macdaddy is a world class idiot.  Perfect example of why it's important to recognize one's own limitations and act within the confines of ones abilities. In his case, I suspect that's floating at the bottom of a pond somewhere sucking on weeds. 
    More Catholic Discussion: http://thetradforum.com


     

    Sitemap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16