Machabees' comments in red
I happened to chance across your recent post titled "Poor Mr. G" while doing research for an article, and was amazed to see you telling the world that "Mr. G is Sean Johnson" (http://cor-mariae.com/index.php?threads/poor-mr-g.6180/#post-11563
Now, I have no idea who "Mr. G" is, but if his writings and views can be mistaken for mine, I'm sure it is no insult. I was informed from various sources, over three weeks, this being the case, no insult nor false interpretation. When I checked and sourced “Mr G’s” own archives, indeed there is a striking resemblance between Mr G and you Sean Johnson; even the immature comebacks are your style especially the mannerism of all things Sean Johnson.
What is insulting (and what reflects very poorly not only on your character, but also on your quality of judgment) is that you yourself acknowledge that I never post anonymously (and haven't since April/2013, for the reason you adduce). You are wrong, again. I did not say “never” as this reflects poorly on your own “honor and character”. Have you forgotten or trying to deceive us too with your recent anonymous name on the now defunct ABLF3 you went under as aka “Br. Athanasius” exploiting your third order Dominican name (for which the Avrille Dominicans have admonished any of their members to do so), and at present, I do not remember if you added another aka on ABLF3 right before you became a second administrator using your own name. All this doesn’t matter right? I’ll let you explain that one.
Be assured, I do not follow you nor even have a bookmark for your website. I only get updates every once and a while in emails of your false branding and hyperbole articles trying to hold up the false resistance; which too is defunct. Not interested.
Yet, that knowledge did not impede you from maligning my honor to the world, based on your own poor and mistaken guesswork.
I want to tell you a little story now, to make you understand just how stupid your claim is; a story which is necessary now, since the SSPX priests and laity who monitor this site will be quite surprised to see me posting here:
You may remember that shortly before I stopped posting here, I had for some time been discussing the problem of rash judgment in Resistance polemics (of which you are the poster boy, par excellence). I had been quite down on myself for having thought that I myself had slid into that sin on a few occasions, and in that contrite state, confessed the problem.
I myself offered to the priest in the confessional that perhaps he should ban me from posting on Cathinfo, as I did not trust myself that I would not eventually fall into recidivism in this regard.
The priest took me up on my proposition, and took it a step further, banning me from even logging in to CI.
That was three years ago, this past Ascension Thursday (and if posting histories are still viewable on this new CI format, you will see I made no posts since that time).
True, from time to time, I submitted articles to Matthew if I thought something was important enough, thereby complying with the letter of the law (even if touching a gray area regarding its "spirit"). Ah there we have the BUT where you play off on Cathinfo to SUBMIT, MONITOR, and have Matthew EDIT for you (like a secretary) your regular “articles” from YOURSELF to contain YOUR brand on YOUR website as some kind of source to go to and build with readership aligning with and pomping the defunct ipsaconteret.com, defunct ABLF3, and on the way defunct Huge Akins site; including, many articles you had posted on Cathinfo from your first defunct website, second defunct website, and now your third resurrection of a new branded-website. Who needs Cathinfo anymore when you have your own website - Wink Piggybacking and usury are strange things. If not both of you benefit when Matthew has nothing else to offer his advertisers but sensational content regurgitating - BW good; Fr. Pfeiffer bad - for ratings. And Branding is not a part of this? Not falling in that trap.
By the way, what is the different of not falling into "recidivism" you say of yourself posting on Cathinfo any different of you falling into the ill "recidivism" on other websites you are a member of and carry on in the same manner on your "own" website? Who is watching the fox...? So it is not my or our "stupid" claim; is it? Please, no need for false humility! As I recall, when you stated this back then, you said the priest told you to STOP all posts and internet activity...your archives will prove this. But why waste time on important details...huh? Like you said, there is the letter and the spirit of it.
In any case, I am sure Matthew possesses some admin tools which can prove I am not "Mr. G" if he has the inclination.
But as regards you, I get the impression that you do not give a damn about rash judgment; I even wonder whether you care about your own salvation, seeing the irresponsible way you conduct yourself.
That said, I am glad you are out there, in order that you can draw other like-minded souls to your caricature of Resistance, like flies to dung, in order that we don't have to deal with them in the sane Resistance.
I have watched/read you act a fool now for several years. Yes, we are aware you regularly visit Cor-Mariae as with Samuel, your new partner for all things Bishop Williamson in the false resistance. Please read on, the contents on Cor-Mariae are quite shocking in nature disclosing the quotes of the neo-tradition Bishop Fellay and the false resistance promote.
I’m informed you follow it so much that you copy some of our content for your website. But come on…let’s not lower oneself to name calling your neighbor. Please speak to a priest about that too…providing real content without conflating it is better than relying on your sullied adjectives to describe a person. Just saying.
Do you not know this is your reputation?
With the grammar of a 6 year-old Yoda, your posted gibberish would have inhibited a wiser man from saying anything at all in public.
But not you. Hmm, I’ll take my natural self and all God sees of me, and not you? Perhaps a little memory can serve you well. Do you not remember being banned from many websites for your vulgar "catholic" mannerism…over many years...from many people trying to help you in the “same”? Glass houses are...(you know the rest).
Well, no more point wasting energy on you.
PS: In case you should start to think I had broken my penance in order to come back on Cathinfo to address you (which would have been a perfectly predictable rash judgment on your part, but do you REALLY think I would be willing to go to purgatory just to argue with you?), know that I explained both the reason for the penance I was given, and the rigor with which I have observed it since it began, to another priest, and taking the responsibility upon himself, he has judged the penance satisfied.
Romans 5:20 "But where sin increased, grace abounded all the more." .
-I retract any and all statements I have made that are incongruent with the True Faith, and apologize for ever having made them- PS: Having this statement in your avatar is rather hypocritical isn’t it? This mental gymnastic is like giving a feigned “permission” for yourself to say whatever you want, however you want, as you do,…giving a basis of incongruity.
By the way, it is noticed you have not addressed the point and content of the said post ("Poor Mr G") calling out the fraud you, Sean Johnson, are doing trying to exploit the Morgon Capuchin's "study" as part of your ill framed "neo-resistance". I'll inform you the Capuchins also came out and denounced such an exploitation. So the aka “Mr G” is only a tooled distraction for you. But what does that matter. Your aim has always been to deflect what is zeroed in on the fraud you present; sorry it is uncomfortable for you. But you made the offensive act against the faith and we will always defend Her honor.
This is a doctrinal problem; not a personal problem you reduce it to.
Hoping for an honest discourse someday.