1) "I was informed by various sources," blah, blah. Your "sources" are obviously idiots, since your "sources" obviously operate on the same rroneous guesswork (i.e., rash judgment) as you do. "Mr. G" had already posted his response, demonstrating we are not the same person, and you follow it with "my sources" and note the similarity of writing style? After we have both denied it? I would say you have only dug your hole deeper: persisting in error and rash judgment even in the face of prima facie proof to the contrary. That is beiutiful Pfeifferian crimethink.
2) Regarding posting on ABLF3 under my former religious name "Br. Athanasius," can you produce the part where I "tried to deceive" you about it? And as for my previous blog platforms (which I often linked to in ABLF3 posts), all the articles I signed/posted as Br. Athanasius still carried the name "Sean Johnson" in the blog article header or footer.
3) You "don't follow me?" You're kidding right? You follow me as closely as Menzingen's watchdogs; you know what I say within a couple hours of saying it. I would say you are one of my most loyal readers! :D
4) You next make a long rambling rant that I am going to have to find a Hmong pre-schooler to explain to me; something about, well, I'm not sure. Having Matthew post articles? Umm, I believe I already covered that in my OP.
5) You "are informed I follow Cor Marie so much..." Are those the same skilled "informers" who "inform" you that "Mr. G" and Sean Johnson are the same person? Nevertheless: Guilty as charged! I do enjoy tuning into Cor Maria, for the same reasons I enjoy tuning in to Traditio: There is very little to be taken seriously on either forum, and nobody really seeking serious instruction or information would depend on either. But for entertainment purposes, it is quite enjoyable! What will they come up with next about Bishop Williamson? Wait a minute: my sources are informing me that you might be "Fr. Moderator!" I argue against them: Fr. Moderator is much too eloquent in comparison!
6) Do I remember being banned from several websites? Angelqueen and ABLF2.1 (Is that still a forum?) Yep, sure do. But that is your response to me telling you that you write like a babbling idiot, and would do yourself (and Boston) a service by canceling your internet service?
7) Your final comment goes off the gibberish charts into pure unintelligibility, but there is something mixed in about the Capuchins opposing the internet publication of their study? The study is over a year old, and was intended for the orientation of their religious, oblates, tertiaries, and friends. If they regret it appearing on the internet, it is not because they abjure the positions contained within it (any more than the Dominicans of Avrille regretted the "Steffeshausen Memorandum" from appearing on the internet, which was likewise drafted for the orientation of their people. Only a Jonestown zealot would try to interpret that as Morgon walking back on their own principles. But hey, they haven't bowed down to Fr. Pfeiffer yet, and until/unless they do, they are......"fake." Right?
But a broken clock is right twice/day, and consequently I do agree with you on one point: It is not clear to me how Morgon could object to the publication of this docuŠ¼ent, when the docuŠ¼ent itself exclaims:
"Confirmation makes us soldiers of Christ: Every Christian must be ready to expose himself to defend the faith. And the sacerdotal character attached to the mission of the Church gives priests the sacred duty of preaching and defending it publicly by combating error.
We are in the Church militant, attacked on all sides by error. To no longer publicly raise a voice against it is to become its accomplice.""
Topic: To An Idiot Calling Himself "Machabees" (Read 2104 times)