Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Conspicuously Absent  (Read 5084 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Conspicuously Absent
« Reply #5 on: October 22, 2014, 05:26:37 PM »
Quote from: Frances
:dancing-banana:
Has anyone noticed the complete absence in SSPX chapels of comment upon the "beatification" of Paul VI and the Synod on the Family?

Perhaps because 95% of the teaching at the synod is in keeping with Catholic Teaching and only 5% is in error, just like Vatican II, no?

Conspicuously Absent
« Reply #6 on: October 22, 2014, 05:47:48 PM »
Quote from: Frances
:dancing-banana:
Has anyone noticed the complete absence in SSPX chapels of comment upon the "beatification" of Paul VI and the Synod on the Family?


At least in Brazil, I am almost sure there was no comment at the chapels about this beatification...


"On October 19, 2014, at the close of the Extraordinary Synod on the family, Pope Francis will go forward with the beatification of Pope Paul VI. The Society of Saint Pius X wishes to express serious reservations concerning beatifications and canonizations of recent popes, whose rushed proceedings dispense with the wisdom of the Church’s centuries-old rules."



There is no condemnation on the official communique of the Society either. "Reservation" is too soft word for this crime.




Conspicuously Absent
« Reply #7 on: October 22, 2014, 09:48:23 PM »
Knowing the not so good health of this pope, would it not stir many people if he were to die suddenly?

Conspicuously Absent
« Reply #8 on: October 23, 2014, 08:43:31 AM »
Quote from: Ekim
Priest at our chapel just said the synod was to take VII to the next level. VII wasn't bad enough, now they are trying to make it worse.  No mention of PVI though.


I still find it interesting that the conservative Catholics claim that Vatican 2 was merely a "pastoral council" while the Conciliar sect constantly (and almost exclusively) quotes it to justify its novel doctrines.

Conspicuously Absent
« Reply #9 on: October 23, 2014, 05:58:44 PM »
Quote from: Green Scapular
Quote from: Frances
:dancing-banana:
Has anyone noticed the complete absence in SSPX chapels of comment upon the "beatification" of Paul VI and the Synod on the Family?


During the month of October Fr. Wegner has requested that all SSPX priests in the USA District gives their Sunday sermons on "The Family" in order to restate the clear Church teachings in opposition to the disastrous Synod that has caused great confusion  and scandal.  

The news outlets of the SSPX have not been silent either about the Synod or about the beatification.  

I cannot believe you would be unaware of all this, so you must simply think that what they're doing is not enough.  To say there is a "complete absence" is an untruth.  


To accuse someone of telling an "untruth" to to accuse her of being a liar.  Frances is not a liar, so I believe her when she says that nothing has been said at her particular chapel.

Marsha