Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Conference in Saint Marys  (Read 3384 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline sspxbvm

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 477
  • Reputation: +851/-0
  • Gender: Male
Conference in Saint Marys
« on: April 18, 2013, 12:26:47 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • http://ourladysresistance.org/what-to-expect-at-april-16-conference.html

    Let me know if it is hard to distinguish between what Father Themann said and our opinions. PM me


    On the evening of April 16, 2013 Father Themann gave a conference in the auditorium on the grounds of Saint Mary's Academy and college. He showed a tremendous amount of calm and courteous behavior. There was a certain natural goodness in his attitude. He certainly wasn't looking for a fight and didn't expect one as we were told to be nice in our comments.

    What was heard was enough to make comments on for many weeks. However, we decided to take to task simply putting on display for all to see some key aspects of the talk with our initial thoughts. Look to our HOME page for clarity in the days to come.

    It all started with Father Beck making the announcement that they reserve all rights to any audio recording. In other words if your a little guy we will come after you. If your the media or somebody with money enough to defend yourself we will leave you be. This was our reaction as it seemed unlawful to PREVENT a recording in a public religious event. So the  brain scrambling started early.

    While we were busy wondering about that he proceeded to introduce Father Themann. Emphasizing that Father Themann is a professor at the seminary in Winona. Quickly the mind went back about 2 years ago when Father Themann wasn't even allowed to give advice to the faithful because he was a newer priest. He's come a long way in 2 years.

    In his introduction Father Beck said that the role of the Devil is to confuse, to spread distrust and lead souls, if possible, astray. Being supporters  of Catholic Resistance we couldn't help but notice how this comes no where near to describing us. Perhaps they were going to try to label us tonight? It was hard to tell. The people we have met in the Resistance are actually some of the finest and serious Catholics we have ever met. The calumny was quite disturbing. Even more disturbing was the altruistic way in which it was all said.

    Father started by explaining truth. Yes. truth with a small "t"apparently. This explanation will likely be touched on in days to come on our Home page. He did say  "It is possible for somebody to speak very passionately about this word (truth) and yet not make a serious effort to acquire it."  He said we have to judge precisely and accurately in order to live a right thinking life. "To judge precisely and accurately is what it means to take truth seriously."  Okay, all fine and dandy but wouldn't it be a sign of taking truth seriously if we sought first the grace to judge precisely and accurately?

    He continued:

    1. Original sin gets in the way of our judging accurately
    2.The emotion of fear steps in
    3. Passions have to be put down before we can do serious thinking. General Patton says "never take advice from fear"
    4.We might include evidence that is not relevant or exclude evidence that is relevant (wiggle room for the neo-sspx so the Resistance can be accused)
    5.We give an unreasonable credibility to the evidence at hand. Don't be gullible or skeptical.
    6.We investigate too much to to little.
    7.Don't confuse "it might be true" with "it is true"

    Father Themann told a story that tried to show the people that if you hear something tonight (or in general) it is possible you won't understand it and come away saying Father Themann said this when in fact he didn't mean it that way. It seemed a way of making more wiggle room.

    He did bring up Our Lady and how some people might say Father doesn't love Our Lady and he proceeded to explain how that judgment could come from a faulty interpretation of what a person says. Interesting to note: This is the only time Our Lady was mentioned. It seemed a quick and simple way of cleaning up the mess many priests get themselves into by not having devotion to Our Lady by emphasizing the necessity of praying the Holy Rosary to keep a clear mind in our confusing times. This would have been a prime time in his talk to speak of the Rosary which is the "LAST" remedy given us by God (Sister Lucia of Fatima)

    We must seriously make an effort to judge precisely or we will fail. He didn't give us any advice on how to make that effort (like pray for the grace, pray the Rosary for Our Lady's help...spiritual things first).


    It is impossible to give all he said in one sitting. But he proceeded to speak about PRUDENCE vs. PRINCIPLE. This eventually let up to comments on how Bishop Fellay's decision to join (editor note:apostate) Rome without Rome converting is a decision of prudence. He said decisions based on prudence can change given the circuмstances and hence (since things are better in Rome & the Church than in the Archbishop's time) it is okay for Bishop Fellay to seek union with Rome (editor note: whom Our Lady said would lose the Faith and become the seat of the Anti-Christ). Around 800 people took this mush into their intellects.


    He told a story of how he met 2 Novus Ordo priests who didn't like the way their bishop was running the diocese. They told Father Themann they wish the bishop would be more of a disciplinarian. He gave THIS as his personal proof that things are getting better in the Church today. Never mind Assisi 3, a pope who is an honorary Freemason, and the overall chaos and dark confusion in the world because the Truth is absent in people's lives. The world is getting closer and closer to accepting the eventual reign of the Anti-Christ and "things are getting better in the Church" ...yeah.

    He says he is convinced that most people have a lack of understanding of the principles with which the SSPX has always stood for. He said many people hold sedevacantist opinions without thinking they do.He said Vatican II is the problem for the Society. Not just abuses or misinterpretations.

    He said the new Mass is "tainted" and is the problem besides Vatican II.

    He said some of the faithful have taken sedevacantist positions by saying things like "Having anything to do with modernist Rome is a compromise on principle" --He says that it  is true if you are a sedevacantist. He then gives the impression that the hierarchy is the hierarchy so we have to mingle with them. He speaks of certain terms. Conciliar Church to the SSPX means the structure of the Church in so far as it is infected with modern errors. When a sedevacantist uses that term they mean a different structure from the Catholic Church. Or not the Catholic Church but something completely different.

    We are not sedevacantists and don't keep company with any because we don't know any but to say the Concilliar church and the Catholic Church herself are one and the same is contrary to the Archbishop who did ask which church you are talking about when you say Concilliar and Catholic. Another point: How could something dead which Bishop Tissier de Mallerais says needs to be completely disposed of be a part of a living body?


    We have no shepherds to lead the flock. The pope is horribly liberal. The Bishops don't have the Faith and the neo-sspx  keeps harping on those who take the sedevacantist position? The sheep are dispersed in all directions and the Neo-sspx runs around condemning people who have made honest decisions based on what they perceive to be true. First they are trying to make "sedevacantist" a bad word and then they are throwing the Resistance in the oven with them


    To be continued.....


    Offline SeanJohnson

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 15064
    • Reputation: +9980/-3161
    • Gender: Male
    Conference in Saint Marys
    « Reply #1 on: April 18, 2013, 12:37:05 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote:

    "It is impossible to give all he said in one sitting. But he proceeded to speak about PRUDENCE vs. PRINCIPLE. This eventually let up to comments on how Bishop Fellay's decision to join (editor note:apostate) Rome without Rome converting is a decision of prudence. He said decisions based on prudence can change given the circuмstances and hence (since things are better in Rome & the Church than in the Archbishop's time) it is okay for Bishop Fellay to seek union with Rome (editor note: whom Our Lady said would lose the Faith and become the seat of the Anti-Christ). Around 800 people took this mush into their intellects."

    Comment:

    Apparently he didn't read Bishop Fellay's just-released "Letter to Friends and Benefactors #80," in which His Excellency assures us that there has been no fundamental change in Rome, and we must adhere to the principles of Archbishop Lefebvre (from which he claims they have never deviated)!

    It seems the accordistas are having a hard time keeping up with the latest spins coming out of Menzingen.

    "We have always been at war with Eurasia!" (1984)

    Rom 5: 20 - "But where sin increased, grace abounded all the more."


    Offline wallflower

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1866
    • Reputation: +1983/-96
    • Gender: Female
    Conference in Saint Marys
    « Reply #2 on: April 18, 2013, 12:45:21 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: sspxbvm
    http://ourladysresistance.org/what-to-expect-at-april-16-conference.html


    He showed a tremendous amount of calm and courteous behavior. There was a certain natural goodness in his attitude. He certainly wasn't looking for a fight and didn't expect one as we were told to be nice in our comments.

    That's his natural disposition, a people-person and likeable, which is probably a big reason he was selected for the job.


    It all started with Father Beck making the announcement that they reserve all rights to any audio recording. In other words if your a little guy we will come after you. If your the media or somebody with money enough to defend yourself we will leave you be. This was our reaction as it seemed unlawful to PREVENT a recording in a public religious event. So the  brain scrambling started early.

    I hope you recorded anyway! You could always have it and then see if they could make that kind of claim, as opposed to not having it and finding out they couldn't prevent it.

    Also, for people who really hammer it home that we must listen to their own words, NOT (ahem) rumors, to turn around and prevent their own words from being distributed, it is a bit of a disappointment, no?




    Offline wallflower

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1866
    • Reputation: +1983/-96
    • Gender: Female
    Conference in Saint Marys
    « Reply #3 on: April 18, 2013, 12:48:50 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: SeanJohnson
    Quote:

    It seems the accordistas are having a hard time keeping up with the latest spins coming out of Menzingen.





    When you tell the truth, you don't need a long memory.


    (Not meant for Fr Themann specifically who probably believes what he said, but meant in general for Menzingen keeping up with their own spins.)

    Offline Telesphorus

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 12713
    • Reputation: +22/-13
    • Gender: Male
    Conference in Saint Marys
    « Reply #4 on: April 18, 2013, 12:54:56 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote
    He said many people hold sedevacantist opinions without thinking they do.


    That is a ridiculous statement.  

    Really it goes to the heart of their double-talk.  Because they take both sides of the issue, because it lets them condemn either side depending on what is convenient for them at the moment.

    Conciliarists have said the SSPX is implicitly sede for years.  Were they wrong?  In fact the neo-SSPX condemns those as implicitly sede for holding the views it once did.  

    It is a simple fact that the new explanations about the "conciliar church" are a complete departure in substance from the explanations of the Archbishop.

    Rome est dans l'apostasie

    http://www.tagtele.com/videos/voir/36078

    EITHER YOU SPEAK LIKE THE ARCHBISHOP DID, OR YOU DON'T.

    OR YOU DECEIVE AND PRETEND THAT ROME IS CHANGING.  THAT IS LYING!



    Offline SeanGovan

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 162
    • Reputation: +229/-7
    • Gender: Male
    Conference in Saint Marys
    « Reply #5 on: April 18, 2013, 01:11:21 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • The problem with double-talk is that it spreads the Liberal virus. If you are told by someone you trust that yes is true, and then told by the same person one week later that no is true, then your chances of catching Liberalism just multiplied a hundredfold.

    I'm not going to Mass at the seminary anymore. After the doctrinal preamble came out, it took me about two weeks to decide that it would be pointless. I stopped going to the Institute of Christ the King a long time ago because it has doctrines like the ones in the preamble. Traveling three and a half hours to attend a Neo-SSPX Mass instead of 75 minutes to attend an ICK Mass would be totally inconsistent. I'm not saying that everyone who is still going to Neo-SSPX Masses is a Liberal (yet); but judging from the long-term effects of attending indult Masses - effects which I have been able to observe first-hand in every single Catholic member of my family, and in every single Catholic friend I've had since the age of ten - going to such Masses is a sign that one is catching an apparently incurable mental disease which enables the sufferer to miraculously reconcile contradictory statements in his own mind. The consequence of this disease is loss of the Catholic Faith. My parents are modernists. They speak like Catholics when they are with Catholics and they speak like Protestants when they are with Protestants. They tell the Protestants that everything is wonderful and they let them think that Catholics and Protestants have the same religion! They ask them for their prayers and they let them think that we're all going to Heaven together! I don't want to catch that mental disease and I don't want to lose my Faith. Therefore, I am not going back. What I am doing is staying at home, reading my missal and saying my Rosary. But I am not going to the Mass of any priest who stands by and says nothing while his superiors betray the Catholic Faith.

    As Father Bolduc used to say, God can keep me here as long as he likes, but let Him not hesitate to take me any time that I'm in a state of grace. If I knew that I was about to die five minutes from now, I would be extremely happy and relieved. The reason is very simple: I would rather spend the rest of my life without the Mass, and die without sacraments, than expose my Faith to danger. But it would be much safer for me to die now than to die in sixty years, because without sacraments it is very difficult to stay in the state of grace. I have no idea how things are going to work out, but I know what I have to do: Adversus hostem aeterna auctoritas esto! To the enemy no quarter!
    Adversus hostem Fidei aeterna auctoritas esto! To the enemies of the Faith no quarter!

    If they refuse to be converted by the Heart of the Immaculate, then in the end they shall be

    Offline Marlelar

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3473
    • Reputation: +1816/-233
    • Gender: Female
    Conference in Saint Marys
    « Reply #6 on: April 18, 2013, 04:57:26 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • If they are telling the truth and want to set the record straight I would think they would have wanted their conference recorded and distributed far and wide in order to quell rumors and mis-information.

    Marsha

    Offline parentsfortruth

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3821
    • Reputation: +2664/-26
    • Gender: Female
    Conference in Saint Marys
    « Reply #7 on: April 18, 2013, 05:51:06 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • And this is the priest that's at Saint Michael's right now.  :cry:

    Far cry from Father Bolduc, to be sure.

    This is the mush he's teaching at the adult catechism classes at our Church. This Sunday, after I heard that his sermon was basically another one about "obedience" and how we should be "shamed" for being disobedient and all this, I didn't even bother staying.

    Matthew 5:37

    But let your speech be yea, yea: no, no: and that which is over and above these, is of evil.

    My Avatar is Fr. Hector Bolduc. He was a faithful parish priest in De Pere, WI,


    Offline parentsfortruth

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3821
    • Reputation: +2664/-26
    • Gender: Female
    Conference in Saint Marys
    « Reply #8 on: April 18, 2013, 05:52:10 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Johannes

    As Father Bolduc used to say, God can keep me here as long as he likes, but let Him not hesitate to take me any time that I'm in a state of grace. If I knew that I was about to die five minutes from now, I would be extremely happy and relieved. The reason is very simple: I would rather spend the rest of my life without the Mass, and die without sacraments, than expose my Faith to danger. But it would be much safer for me to die now than to die in sixty years, because without sacraments it is very difficult to stay in the state of grace. I have no idea how things are going to work out, but I know what I have to do: Adversus hostem aeterna auctoritas esto! To the enemy no quarter!


     :cry:

    Yes, thank you for that.
    Matthew 5:37

    But let your speech be yea, yea: no, no: and that which is over and above these, is of evil.

    My Avatar is Fr. Hector Bolduc. He was a faithful parish priest in De Pere, WI,

    Offline sspxbvm

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 477
    • Reputation: +851/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Conference in Saint Marys
    « Reply #9 on: April 18, 2013, 07:07:51 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Marlelar
    If they are telling the truth and want to set the record straight I would think they would have wanted their conference recorded and distributed far and wide in order to quell rumors and mis-information.

    Marsha


    I hope I didn't give some misinformation. They did apparently record it.

    We are going by some notes--I hope it sparks my memory as I go through it. Ugh.



     

    Offline sspxbvm

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 477
    • Reputation: +851/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Conference in Saint Marys
    « Reply #10 on: April 18, 2013, 07:54:59 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: SeanJohnson
    Quote:

    "It is impossible to give all he said in one sitting. But he proceeded to speak about PRUDENCE vs. PRINCIPLE. This eventually let up to comments on how Bishop Fellay's decision to join (editor note:apostate) Rome without Rome converting is a decision of prudence. He said decisions based on prudence can change given the circuмstances and hence (since things are better in Rome & the Church than in the Archbishop's time) it is okay for Bishop Fellay to seek union with Rome (editor note: whom Our Lady said would lose the Faith and become the seat of the Anti-Christ). Around 800 people took this mush into their intellects."

    Comment:

    Apparently he didn't read Bishop Fellay's just-released "Letter to Friends and Benefactors #80," in which His Excellency assures us that there has been no fundamental change in Rome, and we must adhere to the principles of Archbishop Lefebvre (from which he claims they have never deviated)!

    It seems the accordistas are having a hard time keeping up with the latest spins coming out of Menzingen.

    "We have always been at war with Eurasia!" (1984)



    Good point


    Offline sspxbvm

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 477
    • Reputation: +851/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Conference in Saint Marys
    « Reply #11 on: April 18, 2013, 08:06:14 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Johannes
    The problem with double-talk is that it spreads the Liberal virus. If you are told by someone you trust that yes is true, and then told by the same person one week later that no is true, then your chances of catching Liberalism just multiplied a hundredfold.

    I'm not going to Mass at the seminary anymore. After the doctrinal preamble came out, it took me about two weeks to decide that it would be pointless. I stopped going to the Institute of Christ the King a long time ago because it has doctrines like the ones in the preamble. Traveling three and a half hours to attend a Neo-SSPX Mass instead of 75 minutes to attend an ICK Mass would be totally inconsistent. I'm not saying that everyone who is still going to Neo-SSPX Masses is a Liberal (yet); but judging from the long-term effects of attending indult Masses - effects which I have been able to observe first-hand in every single Catholic member of my family, and in every single Catholic friend I've had since the age of ten - going to such Masses is a sign that one is catching an apparently incurable mental disease which enables the sufferer to miraculously reconcile contradictory statements in his own mind. The consequence of this disease is loss of the Catholic Faith. My parents are modernists. They speak like Catholics when they are with Catholics and they speak like Protestants when they are with Protestants. They tell the Protestants that everything is wonderful and they let them think that Catholics and Protestants have the same religion! They ask them for their prayers and they let them think that we're all going to Heaven together! I don't want to catch that mental disease and I don't want to lose my Faith. Therefore, I am not going back. What I am doing is staying at home, reading my missal and saying my Rosary. But I am not going to the Mass of any priest who stands by and says nothing while his superiors betray the Catholic Faith.

    As Father Bolduc used to say, God can keep me here as long as he likes, but let Him not hesitate to take me any time that I'm in a state of grace. If I knew that I was about to die five minutes from now, I would be extremely happy and relieved. The reason is very simple: I would rather spend the rest of my life without the Mass, and die without sacraments, than expose my Faith to danger. But it would be much safer for me to die now than to die in sixty years, because without sacraments it is very difficult to stay in the state of grace. I have no idea how things are going to work out, but I know what I have to do: Adversus hostem aeterna auctoritas esto! To the enemy no quarter!


    This is a very honest post. We too have quit the chapel since just before Lent. It's the Faith at risk here. The more time one spends in the rain the more they will absorb the water and become drenched.

    I did attend Mass last Sunday in order to be sure the neo-SSPX is the same. If they are (by some miracle) improving then we are obligated to attend. At my judgment I don't want God to say that I didn't even try to give them another chance in order to please Him by obeying the laws of the Church to the best of my ability. I do believe it will cover me when God judges me. Also, I had a "feeling" that this was the week to check it out. Well, sure enough it was the Sunday of Fr. Beck's announcement of Fr. Themann coming. AND Fr. Beck's calumnious remarks about the Resistance gave me the assurance I have made the right decision to not attend their Masses.  However, thank God I was there to find out Fr. Themann was coming!  God is good.

    If we don't get a Catholic burial just remember that most of the martyrs didn't get a Catholic burial either. Pray your Rosary and wear  your scapular and a Catholic burial won't matter. You may be in heaven already by the time the burial took place anyway (with the Sabbatine privilege). But STAY IN THE STATE OF GRACE!!


    Offline Incredulous

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8901
    • Reputation: +8675/-849
    • Gender: Male
    Conference in Saint Marys
    « Reply #12 on: April 18, 2013, 08:37:25 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • It's hard to tell if Father Themann actually changed his Catholic beliefs to conform with the the neoSSPX corporate line ?

    Consider, he's a product of the Winona seminary (post Bp. Williamson), so his formation obviously included "softening-up" to newRome.

    But it is pathetic that poor Father Themann can't accurately explain the SSPX's current position ?  
    This is due to Menzingen's spinelessness... which changes statements and policies based on the latest wind from newChurch politics.
    "Some preachers will keep silence about the truth, and others will trample it underfoot and deny it. Sanctity of life will be held in derision even by those who outwardly profess it, for in those days Our Lord Jesus Christ will send them not a true Pastor but a destroyer."  St. Francis of Assisi

    Offline Neil Obstat

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 18177
    • Reputation: +8276/-692
    • Gender: Male
    Conference in Saint Marys
    « Reply #13 on: April 18, 2013, 10:05:03 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Marlelar
    If they are telling the truth and want to set the record straight I would think they would have wanted their conference recorded and distributed far and wide in order to quell rumors and mis-information.

    Marsha


    Exactly, Marsha.  Their only purpose could be to protect their lies.  
    They're more worried about "rumors" because it all depends on what you
    mean by "rumors."  What THEY mean is "anything they don't want you to
    know" is a "rumor."


    Members should bring a recorder and get an audio just in case.  Be sure to
    put your mic or recorder on a shelf or a chair next to you where there won't
    be a lot of ambient noises, so you'll be able to hear all the nuances of the
    speaker.  

    Quote from: sspxbvm
    Quote from: Marlelar
    If they are telling the truth and want to set the record straight I would think they would have wanted their conference recorded and distributed far and wide in order to quell rumors and mis-information.

    Marsha


    I hope I didn't give some misinformation. They did apparently record it.

    We are going by some notes--I hope it sparks my memory as I go through it. Ugh.
     


    So they recorded it.  Great.  And what are you going to do when the version
    they come out with has missing parts?  "I remember there was more right
    here but now it's edited out!  What's going on?"  Sound like fun?  

    "Oh no, you must be mistaken.  We didn't edit anything.  It's all right there."  

    "Really?? I know there is a recording of the WHOLE THING because I've
    heard it.  And I can tell you what's missing.  A, B, and C are missing. Now,
    why would you have removed A, B and C?"  

    They might squirm and howl, but they won't be able to do anything because
    you are not selling the recording.  They have no legal right to forbid you
    to make your own recording for your own purposes, so long as you don't
    try to sell copy.  Let them howl and scream.  Watch them make fools of
    themselves.  That might be fun!!


    .--. .-.-.- ... .-.-.- ..-. --- .-. - .... . -.- .. -. --. -.. --- -- --..-- - .... . .--. --- .-- . .-. .- -. -.. -....- -....- .--- ..- ... - -.- .. -.. -.. .. -. --. .-.-.

    Offline 1st Mansion Tenant

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1765
    • Reputation: +1446/-127
    • Gender: Female
    Conference in Saint Marys
    « Reply #14 on: April 18, 2013, 11:13:01 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Yes, show up with recorders and I bet the sparks will fly- until they are turned on. Then there will be silence because they will refuse to speak until the devices are removed.