Bishop Fellay is learning the art of hypocrisy from Francis and the Romans. He does not know when to keep his mouth shut. In this Communiqué he, "maintains that the present state of necessity renders legitimate (his) actions" while the "state of necessity" does not exist for anyone else.
How is this possible? Because + Fellay is claiming that the SSPX is all that is necessary for any traditional Catholic and therefore no state of necessity exists. He is in fact claiming "jurisdiction" over traditional Catholics that are not in a regular canonical status!
Who gave it to him? If it was given by Rome he has taken the 1989 Profession of Faith vowing unconditional submission of the "mind and will" to the personal demands of the pope. He has then vowed to play the part of the Judas Goat leading traditional Catholic into heresy and the accommodation of error for canonical regularization with Rome. If it has not been given to him by Rome it proves him a schismatic because he is claiming jurisdiction that he does not possess.
Well said. I had the same thinking when I read peterp's argument yesterday.
Basically, they say that the SSPX got "dibs" on the State of Necessity for Traditional Catholics, and now all of us have to deal with the SSPX or else. If we get on the wrong side of them, get kicked out, etc.? Well, it's just too bad for us!
It also reminds me of Fr. Pfeiffer's belief that he got "dibs" on the non-sedevacantist, Traditional movement (Resistance to modernism) in the United States. If a new priest leaves the SSPX and wants to start a Traditional apostolate in this country, completely opposing Modernism and Vatican II, it's "too bad for him" -- he has to go through Fr. Pfeiffer now. Fr. Pfeiffer marked out the whole territory in 2012, and now all the viable Trad chapel locations are "his" to dispose of as he sees fit. Not so -- who gave him such
jurisdiction?
They can jump in the lake.
They're effectively claiming JURISDICTION over Traditional Catholics without using the J word. They want to have their cake and eat it too.
Sorry, but we are not obligated to go through the SSPX, or the SSPX-MC (Pfeiffer Resistance) for that matter. To claim that we do is to
literally claim that they have an actual JURISDICTION which is a one-per-church thing. (i.e., only one bishop can claim jurisdiction over the diocese of Paris -- at least within the Catholic Church)
The SSPX is no more "special" than a single independent priest saying Mass in a hotel room in a case of necessity. To think otherwise is to be a fanboy of the SSPX and basically a cult follower.
Too many people think the SSPX is "special". It might be the biggest, or a trad group on steroids, but there is nothing intrinsically or metaphysically different about the group "SSPX" vs. a small group of 20 faithful that have a priest drive out to say Mass in a trailer once a month. The former is just a larger version of the latter.