From what it seems, the folks at Church Militant are liars. But there does seem to be sơdơmy smoke within the SSPX. I have heard about that Uritogoity guy and that Sloniker fellow and rumors of sơdơmy among the laity, but CM is trying to paint a picture far worse. If only we had honest reporters to do this investigation.
No question they have an axe to grind against the SSPX, especially now, when Marcel Lefebvre absolutely looks like he had 20:20 vision in 1971 and 1988.
I fail to see how any honest person looking at the state of the Church today can conclude that Lefebvre was wrong to consecrate 4 Bishops. Had he not done that it would be game over. There is no way Francis would tolerate a Latin Rite chapter in the Church opposing him.
Sloniker was a layman. I don't see that the SSPX can peak into every truck he drives and snoop into the private life of the people who attend mass. Neither can any organisation have half of its staff policing the other half. There has to be a level of trust to operate a company, an army or a priestly society. What army has been to war without some women getting raped by some evil soldiers. Does not mean the army was bad or the war was unjust. The right thing to do is shoot those soldiers by firing squad.
Carlos Urrutigoity was a very egregious case as was the priest in Belgium who raped small children but for different reasons. Urrutigoity because he was re-accepted after a warning (should never have taken that risk) and the Belgian priest because they knew and should have drummed him out.
You are going to get sodomy everywhere, whatever organisation you set up. Sodomites are liars and they will tell the seminary director what he wants to hear. The issue is not really sodomites, unless you are wilfully inviting them to join or have no net to even attempt to filter them out.
The worst aspect by FAR of the situation is that these priests were not exposed, handed to the police and jailed once the evidence was clear.
Topic: Church Militant TV (Read 7856 times)