Is there a cliffs notes version that can be skimmed?  Preferably text?

Palmquist basically says that the entire Church Militant piece about him was a pack of lies, a narrative they spun to give a false impression and to fuel their agenda, that they totally lack journalistic integrity ... which most of us already knew, but he backed that up with details

Is there a cliffs notes version that can be skimmed?  Preferably text?

Yeah. Who wants to watch a half hour of that fallen priest and sodomite. I don't even wanna look at 'im. And it doesn't seem like there can be enough important details to warrant the time. I'll take a miss, thank you. 

If 12 year old St Maria Goretti were as naive and ignorant as many trads she would not have fought off her attacker so violently.

Fathers who allow their daughters freedom to mingle unchaperoned with men don't value her purity.  Therefore she won't either.

If 12 year old St Maria Goretti were as naive and ignorant as many trads she would not have fought off her attacker so violently.

Fathers who allow their daughters freedom to mingle unchaperoned with men don't value her purity.  Therefore she won't either.

There’s so much missing in Francis’s gαy trad story?

What was his childhood formation, his religious & family life?  Why did he want to be a priest?

To make it to priesthood he had to have completely understood the real Catholic Faith and culture and the essential the love for Christ.

Yet he gave it all away for a Mexican tattoo parlor and a haunting life of unnatural sex?

There must be a demon somewhere in story?

Yet he gave it all away for a Mexican tattoo parlor and a haunting life of unnatural sex?

You must not have listened to the whole thing.  He says that Voris got it wrong and that he has no tattoo parlor and also denies that he is living with another ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ, as Voris claimed.  He lists an entire list of details that Voris got wrong, including the allegation that he was KNOWN at the SSPX to have ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ inclinations.

He likened his struggle to that of a non-ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ seminarian fighting thoughts of attraction toward women, then in the interests of the vocation he was pursuing, he fought and suppressed these.  He says that it wasn't until a year after he was ordained that he had his "crisis".

In the video, Palmquist comes across as sincere and honest, and he probably is about most things. Though he denies having a tattoo parlor, it's possible that he does do tattoos, just not in a parlor.

It's good that he calls out Voris for his usual lies. If anything good comes from this, it will be that it is evident Voris is not honest. But then most of us know that already.

Palmquist's honestly and sincerity are somewhat disarming, which might lead one (non-trads anyway) to be sympathetic to his situation. However, what Palmquist doesn't say is that it's not just traditionalists who are opposed to ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ behavior, but that the Church has always been opposed to it. For 2000 years. I don't think that Palmquist will address this, but he might someday.

In the video, Palmquist comes across as sincere and honest, and he probably is about most things. Though he denies having a tattoo parlor, it's possible that he does do tattoos, just not in a parlor.

It's good that he calls out Voris for his usual lies. If anything good comes from this, it will be that it is evident Voris is not honest. But then most of us know that already.

Palmquist's honestly and sincerity are somewhat disarming, which might lead one (non-trads anyway) to be sympathetic to his situation. However, what Palmquist doesn't say is that it's not just traditionalists who are opposed to ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ behavior, but that the Church has always been opposed to it. For 2000 years. I don't think that Palmquist will address this, but he might someday.

What strikes me listening to Palmquist, and other ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs, is that somewhere along the line they stop seeing their temptations as temptations. At some point ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity becomes who they are.
  I think most people on this forum define themselves by the Faith, or at least try to, and view everything through that. Has anyone ever seen an interview or known a ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ, particularly a Catholic, who has identified that moment when they chose?