The most notable example of this is the treatment of all dealings with Rome or Novus Ordo bishops and priests as part of the sellout. I find this reminiscent of the Pharisees' reaction to Jesus socializing and eating with publicans and sinners. You will recall Jesus's response: that he had not come to call the righteous, but sinners. Compare: they admit retired Novus Ordo bishops to retire to live in their schools (or more accurately, admit one Novus Ordo bishop to live in one of their schools, and sometimes invite NO bishops to visit the Society priories and parishes in their dioceses).
I don't recall Jesus eating with publicans and sinners and then inviting them to live among the children as authority figures. This is a faulty comparison. I'd like to see the backlash (I still have hope there might be some) if they placed a blatantly modernist NO bishop smack in the middle of an SSPX school here in the US. Think about that, a blatantly modernist bishop permanently set up in St Mary's, Armada, Walton, any other parish school, hearing confessions and participating in the school life, without ever having publicly renounced his errors. It's hard to believe that would not shock a good number of people.
(Not to mention he says himself that he is there as a liaison for Rome, so the "eating with publicans and sinners" is false twice over.)
Topic: Charity towards a Corporate Person? (Read 2259 times)