Mr. Baldwin from Ignis Ardens,
Why do you enjoy hiding in your little cave over there at IA? Do you have the
courage of your convictions? Are you willing to set foot into a real forum of
discussion, or do you just like to hide like a coward all the time, perhaps in
real life as you do on the Internet?
Anthony Malleus from Ignis Ardens,
Are you just a little weaker than your mentor Mr. Baldwin? It seems you rarely
have much initiative of your own but wait instead for him to take a stand and
then you follow like a sheep dog, or, is it a lap dog? You tell me.
Here are a few of your collective, ridiculous assertions:
Bishop Fellay was simply following the clear path of Archbishop Lefebvre, who himself sought a regularization with Rome after the 1974 declaration they keep referring to.
This is patently false. It is a lie. If you don't think so, come in here and let's talk.
The other option is for them to hold to their opinion and to continue, week after week, to give anti-sspx sermons (very edifying for the faithful). Forgetting about the errors of Vatican II, the new "error" they will focus on is the SSPX - the boogie man that must be opposed each week in order to justify themselves and their new project.
How generous of you to admit that Fr. Pfeiffer's sermons are edifying. Perhaps you
should listen more closely and you might learn something. You think, for example,
that he has forgotten about the errors of Vatican II? That alone proves you haven't
been paying much attention. Shall we enumerate the citations of Vatican II errors
to which Fr. Pfeiffer alludes in context with the present
defection of the nefarious
Fellayites? Do you have a spine, Mr. Baldwin?? Or, are you without one?
May they realize their error soon, before the pit are digging themselves into is too deep to escape from.
And if you're bent on ending
already poorly-composed phrases and sentences with a preposition, come on over to CathInfo and see what happens....
AM:
It is as though Fr. Pfeiffer and co. want to see a division in the SSPX. It seems to come from a perverse spirit. As I have said all along, those who seem hell bent on destroying the reputation of Bishop Fellay seem to have their own agenda, which is not sure pure as they claim.
So it is they, who stand in accord with Apostolic Tradition, who are forcing a
division, is it? Let me guess, you would have been at the elbow of Judas Iscariot,
looking like an earlier version of Quasimodo, "Yes, Master, shall we go spend the
30 pieces of silver now, eh - eh - eh?" Bishop Fellay doesn't need any assistance
in the reputation department, so why are you trying so hard, in the face of reason
and common sense? Or is that your "own agenda?" Make that a "not so pure
agenda." (Or should I say "not sure pure," like you do?)
Okay, Mr. Lucky Baldwin and Anthony Hammerhead, it's your turn...........
(Sorry, Quasimodo, nothing personal: you weren't such a bad guy after all, it's
just the image that I'm after, you know? I hope you don't mind!) (Quasimodo
might actually be a saint in heaven, let's just say "it's a hunch.")
For the record, anyone wishing to look up the source can find it
here.
And this is it:
Mr. Baldwin
Posted: Aug 6 2012, 11:53 AM
Ardent Member
Group: Members
Posts: 153
Member No.: 1823
Joined: 13-May 12
Each week Fr. Pfeiffer seems to be getting more and more desparate.
Are you sure you don't mean desperate? Do you even know what you're talking about?
Or are you simply uneducated and can't bother to use the spell check feature?
Is your reasoning as lousy as your language skills? Oh, wait, I guess not. It's worse.
He seems determined to break apart the Society by convincing his very small flock that the Society is compromising. Yet his arguments get weaker and weaker each week. It is as though he is shrinking in stature with each new sermon, and, realizing it, is becoming more desparate. He needs our payers. My guess is that at the GC, all of the lies, calumny and detraction that resulted in so much division, were dispelled, and the unity of the Society has returned, or is rapidly being restored.
Unfortunately, Fr. Pfeiffer was caught up in the lies, calumny and detraction and spoke out too soon. He convinced himself and a few others that Bishpop Fellay was going to "sell out" the Soceity, and that he had departed from the path of Archbishop Lefebvre by negotiating with Rome, when in fact Bishop Fellay is following in the footsteps of Archbishop Lefebvre who himself sought regulatizaion with Rome. Even after being "excommunicated", ABL left the door open to future talks with Rome as evidenced by the talk he gave in 1990. But the "sell out" the Fr. Pfeiffer spoke of never materialized. Instead, at the GC it was agreed that prior to any agreement another GC would be held to discuss and vote on the matter. Now, rather than humbling himself and admitting that he was wrong about the "sell out", he seems hell-bent on destroying the Soceity, in order to somehow justify his position. But I think he realizes that his efforts are coming to naught. The unity of the Society has returned, and he finds himself on the outside. It is very sad to watch. May we all keep him in our prayers.
This post has been edited by Mr. Baldwin on Aug 6 2012, 11:54 AM
and.......
Anthony Malleus
Posted: Aug 6 2012, 12:29 PM
Senior Member
Group: Members
Posts: 44
Member No.: 1895
Joined: 7-June 12
Well said Mr. Baldwin,
It is as though Fr. Pfeiffer and co. want to see a division in the SSPX. It seems to come from a perverse spirit. As I have said all along, those who seem hell bent on destroying the reputation of Bishop Fellay seem to have their own agenda, which is not sure pure as they claim.
Bishop Fellay continues to insist that he will not compromise the position of the SSPX and has made that clear again.
I think Fr. Pfeiffer and co. will soon find themselves outside the SSPX and go the way that so many have gone before them.
Indeed, let us keep him and other such self deluded clergy in our prayers.