Fellayites apparently don't engage in reasoned conversation, since they're unreasonable. :roll-laugh2:
Er..... What's a Fellayite?
A Fellayite is someone who..
1. believes the pope isn't a master mind when it comes to annihilate traditional groups,
2. that the SSPX is the "savior of the Church" instead of Our Lady,
3. that Bp. Williamson is a wacko and deserves to be silenced
4. that 95% of the Council is just fine, hoping one day Vatican II will be part of the Tradition of the Church
5. that Religious Liberty is very very very limited,
6. that a zionist as sspx's financial gambler is acceptable,
7. that the horrible Novus Ordo sermons we've been getting is part of "prudence"
8. or that everyone who dare show any OBVIOUS deviation is to be called a sedevacantist/schismatic/sectarian/etc.
9. also they are known to have allergic reactions when they hear the words Pffeifer or Chazal
10. and last but not least to think the conditions approved by the GC aren't suicidal.
I have probably failed to point out other characteristics of a Fellayite but I would say that is a good little synthesis of it; and if you believe in at least two of those points you should be able to claim your "Fellayite Badge" with Fr. Rostand on the Judas Department.
Well, it's certainly a good start, anyway! Good work!
Fellayites apparently don't engage in reasoned conversation, since they're unreasonable. :roll-laugh2:
Oh, yes we do. Sometimes we just give up because you have nothing reasonable to argue with. Bitterness, gossip and slander prevail. How very Catholic!
Fellayites
give up when they have no reasonable explanation for their conspicuous
defense of the indefensible.
Bitterness? Bishop Fellay is observed acting like a traitor, and when we notice the
fact instead of rendering typically Fellayite adulation, that's bitterness?
Gossip? We
are not supposed to take notice of his departure from the principles of ABL as
handed down from Catholic Tradition, and when we do notice, it's "gossip?"
Slander? You ought to look up the term because maybe you're confused. Try
looking up the word, "fact," while you're at it. That might come in useful.
Fellayites are acting toward +Fellay a bit like the Mormons act toward their false
religion and their long-gone founder, Joseph Smith, for they persist at defending
its blatant lies about history, inasmuch as Smith showed up with a fantasy about
early American history that is nowhere supported by any evidence, but is only
proclaimed in his words. Of course, in his case, he claims his words are "God's
words," even while the first Book of Mormon showed Smith as the author.
If it were not for the fact that postConciliar Rome is already a megolith in it's own
right, Fellayism could well be on it's way to becoming another spinoff cult. This is
due to how its followers disengage their intellect and kowtow to whatever drivel
their current spokesman doles out to them. But as it is, it would simply be
swallowed up by the Beast -- after +Fellay signs the "papers," that is.
Bishop Fellay contradicts himself, and Fellayites swallow it hook, line and sinker.
The "truth" is whatever the latest version of his "reality" is, regardless of his own
record. When he attempts to back-track and claim he was "taken out of context,"
or "misunderstood," the Fellayites bob their heads in agreement, like the Muppets.
(Or, like the Mormons!)
How about taking some examples? Will the Fellayites like to talk specifics, or are
they bent on hurling epithets and sweeping statements?
In his infamous interview in Menzingen, +Fellay allowed CNS to bring in their own
equipment and do their own recording for an hour (give or take), but +Fellay did
not make his own tape. What manner of wisdom can explain that blunder? Why
would he have foreigners control such an important interview and its contents?
Was he bowing to the demands of his boss, whoever that is? There he was, holed
up in his palace, unwilling to answer questions from his fellow 3 bishops or any of
his hundreds of priests, acting like a recluse, and yet he seemed to bow and
scrape to the demands of a reporting crew from outside the SSPX. What is the
Fellayite explanation for this odd behavior?
+Fellay's reaction to the tsunami of questions has been a sheepish
embarrassment as if he was caught with his hand in the cookie jar! It has all the
appearance of him knowing that he blundered, but that he's afraid of admitting it
for fear of losing the support of his otherwise mindless lemmings. Is there a better
explanation? If you've got one, BRING IT ON!
Topic: Challenge to Ignis Ardens Fellayites - Come on in, the water-s fine! (Read 9902 times)