Author Topic: CFN does article apology pro Israel? (Read 6084 times)

Centroamerica · « **on:** March 06, 2016, 09:49:34 AM »

I was told that a recent CFN issue had a front cover story by Mrs. Vennari basically as a defense of the h0Ɩ0cαųst or something like this. I think it was on the front cover of the November issue. Did anybody else see this? Can it be confirmed? If you can post parts of the article here that would be great.

Gerard from FE · « **Reply #1 on:** March 06, 2016, 11:01:26 AM »

What's a "defense of the h0Ɩ0cαųst"?

Is it somebody trying to confirm some matters of historical fact against the arguments of revisionist historians?

Or is it a defense in the sense that it did happen and it was warranted? (I doubt that would be the case or it would have been totally out of line for any Catholic.)

Centroamerica · « **Reply #2 on:** March 06, 2016, 11:40:18 AM »

Quote from: Gerard from FE

What's a "defense of the h0Ɩ0cαųst"?

Is it somebody trying to confirm some matters of historical fact against the arguments of revisionist historians?

Or is it a defense in the sense that it did happen and it was warranted? (I doubt that would be the case or it would have been totally out of line for any Catholic.)

You know, that's kind of why I am asking. Because I haven't read the article.

Maria Auxiliadora · « **Reply #3 on:** March 06, 2016, 12:46:50 PM »

The only article on CFN by Susan Vennari that I have seen on the front page is about Mark Riebling's book: Church of Spies on the February 2016 issue. I suggest you read it before you comment on it. The title of the article is "Pacelli's Church of Spies".

Centroamerica · « **Reply #4 on:** March 06, 2016, 01:23:11 PM »

Quote from: Maria Auxiliadora

The only article on CFN by Susan Vennari that I have seen on the front page is about Mark Riebling's book: Church of Spies on the February 2016 issue. I suggest you read it before you comment on it. The title of the article is "Pacelli's Church of Spies".

I believe that this is the artcilce. You know, I wasn't commenting on it. I was asking about it. Is that allowed? Can you post or sum up the article?

cathman7 · « **Reply #5 on:** March 06, 2016, 02:04:40 PM »

That very same issue has an article titled "Christian Zionism: America's Dance with the Devil" by Gary Taphorn.

As for the article mentioned, let the author speak for herself:

Quote

The world looked to the Roman Catholic Pontiff for pounding condemnations of the Reich, but Pius XII was silent. Yet, as Riebling shows in Church of Spies, he was not indifferent to the sufferings of millions of souls in Germany and occupied lands. The leader of the universal Church, having no power of his own, resisted Hitler by underwriting the will and abilities of those close to the maniacal Hitler in every possible way. Because condemnatory language against Hitler would have endangered the lives of Catholics and Jєωs in Germany, and because it would further have restricted the freedom of action of the resistance, Pius XII had to remain silent. The consequence was to bear the world's unjust scorn.

Maria Auxiliadora · « **Reply #6 on:** March 06, 2016, 02:34:55 PM »

Quote from: Centroamerica

Quote from: Maria Auxiliadora
The only article on CFN by Susan Vennari that I have seen on the front page is about Mark Riebling's book: Church of Spies on the February 2016 issue. I suggest you read it before you comment on it. The title of the article is "Pacelli's Church of Spies".

I believe that this is the artcilce. You know, I wasn't commenting on it. I was asking about it. Is that allowed? Can you post or sum up the article?

Sorry, I only have the paper copy and have not read the article. Perhaps you can do a search for it on CFN?

Centroamerica · « **Reply #7 on:** March 06, 2016, 05:33:37 PM »

Quote from: obscurus

That very same issue has an article titled "Christian Zionism: America's Dance with the Devil" by Gary Taphorn.

As for the article mentioned, let the author speak for herself:
Quote

The world looked to the Roman Catholic Pontiff for pounding condemnations of the Reich, but Pius XII was silent. Yet, as Riebling shows in Church of Spies, he was not indifferent to the sufferings of millions of souls in Germany and occupied lands. The leader of the universal Church, having no power of his own, resisted Hitler by underwriting the will and abilities of those close to the maniacal Hitler in every possible way. Because condemnatory language against Hitler would have endangered the lives of Catholics and Jєωs in Germany, and because it would further have restricted the freedom of action of the resistance, Pius XII had to remain silent. The consequence was to bear the world's unjust scorn.

:scratchchin:

cathman7 · « **Reply #8 on:** March 06, 2016, 06:10:57 PM »

I wanted to pm you, Centro, but saw that the pm button was disabled.

Centroamerica · « **Reply #9 on:** March 06, 2016, 07:49:30 PM »

Quote from: obscurus

I wanted to pm you, Centro, but saw that the pm button was disabled.

It should work now.

hollingsworth · « **Reply #10 on:** March 06, 2016, 08:11:59 PM »

quote:

Quote

The leader of the universal Church, having no power of his own, resisted Hitler by underwriting the will and abilities of those close to the maniacal Hitler in every possible way. Because condemnatory language against Hitler would have endangered the lives of Catholics and Jєωs in Germany, and because it would further have restricted the freedom of action of the resistance, Pius XII had to remain silent. The consequence was to bear the world's unjust scorn.

Oh, so that's how the pontiff "resisted Hitler?" How did this pope resist the genocidal Stalin? Why does the author rationalize Pius XII's silence over Hitler, while not, apparently, doing the same in regards to Stalin. Because obviously, history does not record incidents of his speaking out against the murderous Stalin either. This writer focuses on the "maniacal Hitler," and seemingly excuses or fails to note that other monstrous regime contemporary with the German Reich. To tell you the truth, Pius XII, afterwards, was far more concerned about fascism than he was about Bolshevism. In any case, I am not so certain that Hitler was that maniacal.

St Ignatius · « **Reply #11 on:** March 06, 2016, 08:32:17 PM »

Quote from: obscurus

That very same issue has an article titled "Christian Zionism: America's Dance with the Devil" by Gary Taphorn.

As for the article mentioned, let the author speak for herself:
Quote

The world looked to the Roman Catholic Pontiff for pounding condemnations of the Reich, but Pius XII was silent. Yet, as Riebling shows in Church of Spies, he was not indifferent to the sufferings of millions of souls in Germany and occupied lands. The leader of the universal Church, having no power of his own, resisted Hitler by underwriting the will and abilities of those close to the maniacal Hitler in every possible way. Because condemnatory language against Hitler would have endangered the lives of Catholics and Jєωs in Germany, and because it would further have restricted the freedom of action of the resistance, Pius XII had to remain silent. The consequence was to bear the world's unjust scorn.

"Let the the author speak for herself"

This is very disheartening... I canced my subscribtion to the CFN some years ago due to the fact of Mr. Vennari's pandering to political correctness in order to maintain his subscription base, in my opinion. I realize this quote is possibly out of context, but, the quote in itself is extremely disturbing. If these are truly the words of Susan Vennari, the daughter of John Vennari, and Mr. Vennari being the editor to allow such a publication, shows that things are worse than I thought within the CFN. I really don't believe that Fr. Gruner would have agreed with this article. This is pure propaganda from the "perfidious Jєω" to be consumed by the Goyim! This is absolutely disgusting!!

Centroamerica · « **Reply #12 on:** March 06, 2016, 09:14:59 PM »

As if I go around commenting on articles I never read...

cathman7 · « **Reply #13 on:** March 07, 2016, 01:25:41 AM »

Quote from: St Ignatius

Quote from: obscurus
That very same issue has an article titled "Christian Zionism: America's Dance with the Devil" by Gary Taphorn.

As for the article mentioned, let the author speak for herself:
Quote

The world looked to the Roman Catholic Pontiff for pounding condemnations of the Reich, but Pius XII was silent. Yet, as Riebling shows in Church of Spies, he was not indifferent to the sufferings of millions of souls in Germany and occupied lands. The leader of the universal Church, having no power of his own, resisted Hitler by underwriting the will and abilities of those close to the maniacal Hitler in every possible way. Because condemnatory language against Hitler would have endangered the lives of Catholics and Jєωs in Germany, and because it would further have restricted the freedom of action of the resistance, Pius XII had to remain silent. The consequence was to bear the world's unjust scorn.

"Let the the author speak for herself"

This is very disheartening... I canced my subscribtion to the CFN some years ago due to the fact of Mr. Vennari's pandering to political correctness in order to maintain his subscription base, in my opinion. I realize this quote is possibly out of context, but, the quote in itself is extremely disturbing. If these are truly the words of Susan Vennari, the daughter of John Vennari, and Mr. Vennari being the editor to allow such a publication, shows that things are worse than I thought within the CFN. I really don't believe that Fr. Gruner would have agreed with this article. This is pure propaganda from the "perfidious Jєω" to be consumed by the Goyim! This is absolutely disgusting!!

Please explain how this is propaganda. Read the entire article.

Charlotte NC Bill · « **Reply #14 on:** March 07, 2016, 09:54:28 PM »

There weren't even 6 million "Jєωs" ( Khazars) in all of Europe. There were about 5.5 million before the war and 5.3 million after the war. 5.3 from 5.5 doesn't equal 6 in my math. Also some Jєωs went to Palestine ( until Hitler realized what a mistake it would be for the Rothschild Khazar Mafia to essentially erect a crime syndicate hide-out masquerading as a country and decided to relocate them to Madagascar-a wonderful idea I believe. It's bigger than Palestine and the whole lot of them could go there and learn honest, productive work..something foreign and unnatural to most of them )...The camps were work camps where suspected pro-soviets and undesirables could help the country's war effort, and they were relocation camps. It's amazing, Americans purposely targeted German and Japanese urban areas that had no military value and firebombed them and they think they're morally superior. They dropped atom bombs on civilians twice w/o warning ( several mos. AFTER the Japanese offered to surrender). The Americans took the side of Mao and Stalin and they act morally superior. Germany saved Central Europe from an imminent ( planned to occur 3 wks. after Operation Barbarossa ) Soviet invasion. Without German air support Franco would have been swinging from a tree. The Germans allowed 300,000 pinned-down allied troops ( virtually depleted of supplies) to leave Dunkirk and go back across the Channel because they desperately wanted peace with the West. When you scan the real history of the war: 13 million German civilians murdered, 2 million German women raped, 1 million German POWs slowly killed by Ike...And now? Now the German nation which has never recovered, which still has 100,000 foreign troops on her soil, whose people have little in the way of free speech...who are still paralyzed by the h0Ɩ0h0αx are the main target of this Rothschild-Soros neo-con choreographed hostile invasion...Go ahead and think what you want but I won't filter myself to only "Jєω approved ideas". That's essentially the Opus Dei, neo-con Sean Hannity/O'Reilly type of Catholic who really are about as useful as space heaters in the Sahara. Really what hypocrisy! The German work camps had pools, bands, plays, libraries..reasonable work schedules...Compare them to the torture/work-to-death camps run by the Bolshevik Jєωs in the USSR..Or the torture/death camps the Jєωs put Germans in from '45-'49. ( Thanks America )...The vast majority of the deaths in the German camps were at the end of the war, ( typhus ), due to the fact that the glorious allies were bombing all the necessary civilian infrastructure. :reporter: