Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 8

Author Topic: Can we say Fr Hewko is  (Read 35165 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Catholic Knight

Re: Can we say Fr Hewko is
« Reply #15 on: February 07, 2025, 06:50:38 AM »
Quote from: Deipara on February 06, 2025, 03:09:56 PM
He is doctrinally sound. Not a whiff of compromise on doctrine.

Fr. Hewko's doctrine on the pope and heresy, however, is problematic.  His position most closely resembles Opinion No. 3 of the Five Opinions expounded upon by St. Robert Bellarmine.  Opinion No. 3 is the following:

That a pope who is even a manifest heretic is not deposed ipso facto and cannot be deposed by the Church.

This opinion was held by no theologian that I am aware of between Vatican I and Vatican II.  However, after Vatican II it has unfortunately become popular.  This opinion opposes the Magisterium of Pope Pius XII who taught that the public sin of heresy by its very nature separates the heretic from the Church.
Logged

Offline Infirmus

Re: Can we say Fr Hewko is
« Reply #16 on: February 07, 2025, 06:37:58 PM »
Quote from: Catholic Knight on February 06, 2025, 02:09:50 PM
Fr. David Hewko is an amazing priest!  I love him.
Bishop Williamson was MORE amazing. Na na na
Logged

Offline Infirmus

Re: Can we say Fr Hewko is
« Reply #17 on: February 07, 2025, 07:18:48 PM »
Don't get me wrong, Fr Hewko is a good preacher and he is a good priest, but when he is constantly out to get Bishop Williamson there is that other side to him. 
When Moran came out the first thing you see is Moran's sermon about himself which was jaw dropping to say the least,
remember him saying "I'm a very smart man, I knew president Nixon". The next thing you found out was the website that showed he was accepted as a schismatic bishop. Then Fr P does an investigation and he says Moran was bi-religiously consecrated a bishop, in Chicago, by 1 schismatic bishop and 2 NO bishops as part of an ecuŠ¼enical thing. So at the time Fr P and H stood by this. They hid Moran for awhile but then it was found out Moran was staying at some wealthy benefactor's of Fr P and H. 
If Fr Hewko can bark about Bishop Williamson then I can bark about Fr P and H promoting an bi-religious bishop. Is Fr Hewko still okay with schismatic/NO bishop (supposedly never really proven as one) or did he express total regret for that farce?

:popcorn: 
Logged

Offline MaterDominici

  • Mod
  • Supporter
Re: Can we say Fr Hewko is
« Reply #18 on: February 07, 2025, 07:48:18 PM »
Quote from: Infirmus on February 07, 2025, 07:18:48 PM
Don't get me wrong, Fr Hewko is a good preacher and he is a good priest, but when he is constantly out to get Bishop Williamson there is that other side to him.
When Moran came out the first thing you see is Moran's sermon about himself which was jaw dropping to say the least,
remember him saying "I'm a very smart man, I knew president Nixon". The next thing you found out was the website that showed he was accepted as a schismatic bishop. Then Fr P does an investigation and he says Moran was bi-religiously consecrated a bishop, in Chicago, by 1 schismatic bishop and 2 NO bishops as part of an ecuŠ¼enical thing. So at the time Fr P and H stood by this. They hid Moran for awhile but then it was found out Moran was staying at some wealthy benefactor's of Fr P and H.
If Fr Hewko can bark about Bishop Williamson then I can bark about Fr P and H promoting an bi-religious bishop. Is Fr Hewko still okay with schismatic/NO bishop (supposedly never really proven as one) or did he express total regret for that farce?

:popcorn:
The programming is deep for someone who sees a bigger problem with BpW than either Moran (where is he and who is he preying on now?) or the OLMC operation.
Logged

Offline cletus1805

Re: Can we say Fr Hewko is
« Reply #19 on: July 06, 2025, 07:29:54 PM »
is starting a convent for nuns?
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 8
« previous next »