Author Topic: Caminus on IA looking for a serious debate (Read 5536 times)

1st Mansion Tenant · « **on:** April 17, 2013, 06:38:46 PM »

Any of you serious forensics lovers who would like to hone your skills might want to mosey over to IA where a guy named Matt Snyder has posted a challenge. He wants someone to uphold resistance arguments against him. The thread is titled
"To the Schismatics". He seems really arrogant and ready to rumble. Don't shoot the messenger, just thought I would give some of you who who may be interested the info. Sic 'em.

SeanJohnson · « **Reply #1 on:** April 17, 2013, 06:50:43 PM »

Mr. Snyder-

I will accept your challenge, but only on Cathinfo.

In caritas,

Sean Johnson

MaterDominici · « **Reply #2 on:** April 17, 2013, 06:52:10 PM »

In a way it's nice to see he hasn't changed his mind. I felt a little bad about those who were banned straight out of the gate for their accordista opinions not knowing if they'd changed their mind or not as more and more information came to light.

ADD: Scratch that. Matthew says he unbanned him some time ago.

Matthew · « **Reply #3 on:** April 17, 2013, 06:54:50 PM »

I un-banned Caminus (Matt Snyder) several months ago -- apparently he hasn't tried to come back lately.

I assumed that with the OVERWHELMING evidence that the Resistance is the true Traditional position, that he would have come around.

SeanJohnson · « **Reply #4 on:** April 17, 2013, 07:03:10 PM »

Well, then my acceptance stands.

What should the ground rules be?

Matthew · « **Reply #5 on:** April 17, 2013, 07:10:22 PM »

I can/will start a thread, wherein I explain the rules: No one can participate in the thread except 2 members:

SeanJohnson
Caminus

Any comments from the "peanut gallery" will be summarily deleted -- regardless of who is getting the support.

As far as the debate itself, I think I can leave that to you and Matt Snyder.

wallflower · « **Reply #6 on:** April 17, 2013, 07:18:30 PM »

Quote from: Matthew

I assumed that with the OVERWHELMING evidence that the Resistance is the true Traditional position, that he would have come around.

Yes, I would have thought so too. That is unfortunate.

A lot of us just needed time. And still do.

Zeitun · « **Reply #7 on:** April 17, 2013, 07:29:45 PM »

I am SOOOOOO looking forward to this.

Incredulous · « **Reply #8 on:** April 17, 2013, 07:33:27 PM »

Would ya be comin back for another beating Mr. Snyder?

CI members would most enjoy the entertainment!

Neil Obstat · « **Reply #9 on:** April 18, 2013, 04:38:53 AM »

"Matthew Snyder/Caminus?"

Gesundheit!

Mea Culpa · « **Reply #10 on:** April 18, 2013, 08:41:16 AM »

Sean or has anyone else gone over to IA and invite Caminus to this debate?
(in case he doesn't come over here regularly).

Looking for to this :boxer:

SeanJohnson · « **Reply #11 on:** April 18, 2013, 08:43:59 AM »

Quote from: Mea Culpa

Sean or has anyone else gone over to IA and invite Caminus to this debate?
(in case he doesn't come over here regularly).

Looking for to this :boxer:

I did.

If you go over to Ignis Ardens and open the thread in question, you can see my invitation on the 3rd page.

The thread is titled "To the Schismatics"

MyrnaM · « **Reply #12 on:** April 18, 2013, 10:23:29 AM »

Personally I don't care if he comes back or not, I always found him to be interesting, however why should he be invited back, according to the rules he considers most of us to be outside the Church, my understanding of his view point. That is against cathinfo rules.

Mea Culpa · « **Reply #13 on:** April 18, 2013, 11:16:32 AM »

Quote from: MyrnaM

Personally I don't care if he comes back or not, I always found him to be interesting, however why should he be invited back, according to the rules he considers most of us to be outside the Church, my understanding of his view point. That is against cathinfo rules.

It might benefit him as well as many others that visit CI......besides, it would be good to see an open debate that's held in a "civilized"/controlled manner where the Truth can prevail.

1st Mansion Tenant · « **Reply #14 on:** April 18, 2013, 12:21:34 PM »

I saw his name listed as online at IA this morning, so he most likely has found Sean's post.