Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Calling Out Pete Vere:  (Read 25825 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Calling Out Pete Vere:
« Reply #95 on: June 06, 2014, 08:25:53 PM »
Quote from: Centroamerica
...having Mons Des Lauriers tell him he wasn't suppose to say Joahnes Paulo 2 in the rite of consecration...


While we agree Bishop Des Lauriers was right when advising the Archbishop, I am certain that the ABL consecrations are still valid even though he put an anti-pope's name in the rite of consecration.

In all humility, I must admit that in my youth I believed Karol Józef Wojtyła was the pope.  

Calling Out Pete Vere:
« Reply #96 on: June 06, 2014, 09:46:48 PM »
Quote from: Ferdinand
Quote from: Centroamerica
...having Mons Des Lauriers tell him he wasn't suppose to say Joahnes Paulo 2 in the rite of consecration...


While we agree Bishop Des Lauriers was right when advising the Archbishop, I am certain that the ABL consecrations are still valid even though he put an anti-pope's name in the rite of consecration.

In all humility, I must admit that in my youth I believed Karol Józef Wojtyła was the pope.  


Forgot to mention Centroamerica, I wouldn't question the validity of SSPX consecrations and ordinations because of the scandalous (and at times even unnatural) nature of some of the candidates.  Our consolation is that only a minority were such.

Pax,
Ferdinand


Calling Out Pete Vere:
« Reply #97 on: June 08, 2014, 10:59:56 AM »
Quote from: Ferdinand
Quote from: Ferdinand
Quote from: Centroamerica
...having Mons Des Lauriers tell him he wasn't suppose to say Joahnes Paulo 2 in the rite of consecration...


While we agree Bishop Des Lauriers was right when advising the Archbishop, I am certain that the ABL consecrations are still valid even though he put an anti-pope's name in the rite of consecration.

In all humility, I must admit that in my youth I believed Karol Józef Wojtyła was the pope.  


Forgot to mention Centroamerica, I wouldn't question the validity of SSPX consecrations and ordinations because of the scandalous (and at times even unnatural) nature of some of the candidates.  Our consolation is that only a minority were such.

Pax,
Ferdinand



I think you missed the point. I stated that about Mons. Thuc because it supports all the claims that he was not of sound mind during the consecrations. Only a speculation.