Author Topic: Article J. Vennari, Bishop Williamson Expelled (Read 8409 times)

ServusSpiritusSancti · « **Reply #45 on:** October 27, 2012, 02:04:40 PM »

I think Bishop Fellay considered +Williamson to be "too radical" long before his h0Ɩ0cαųst remarks. When +Williamson first began his "Eleison Comments" blog in 2007, Fellay wanted it to be a private newspaper rather than be made public.

Now, where in the statutes of the SSPX does it say that the Society's Bishops can't communicate with the laity? Fellay's demand that Bishop Williamson get rid of his blog was nothing more than an attempt to silence him, because Fellay is a liberal tyrant who is fond of Jєωs and thought that Benedict was a "friend of Tradition".

So even if His Excellency had never made the comments about the h0Ɩ0cαųst, he'd probably still be expelled. If anyone deserves to be expelled, it's Bishop Fellay and liberal, arrogant priests like Fr. Rostand and Fr. Pfluger.

Telesphorus · « **Reply #46 on:** October 27, 2012, 02:08:27 PM »

Can anyone really imagine Bishop Fellay wasn't well-informed of what Bishop Williamson was saying for years and years? If Bishop Fellay had thought it was really wrong or serious he would have condemned it publicly years ago. This isn't a matter of Bishop Fellay's disagreement with Bishop Williamson. What has occurred is a political struggle where Bishop Fellay has used his influence as SG to consolidate control over the SSPX. Now that he has that control, he no longer has to (in order to keep control) do more than pay lip service to the Archbishop.

Telesphorus · « **Reply #47 on:** October 27, 2012, 02:18:13 PM »

That's not to say there isn't public disagreement. It's just that Bishop Fellay is not relying on any authentic principles of traditionalism as the basis for the disagreement. It's useless to talk about true and false obedience and expect Bishop Fellay or his blind followers to give it a hearing.

s2srea · « **Reply #48 on:** October 27, 2012, 03:07:13 PM »

Quote from: Telesphorus

Can anyone really imagine Bishop Fellay wasn't well-informed of what Bishop Williamson was saying for years and years?

This is a good point.

sspxbvm · « **Reply #49 on:** October 27, 2012, 05:52:49 PM »

Quote from: Ethelred

Quote from: Lepanto Again
The h0Ɩ0cαųst interview may have been a "mistake"

No, it wasn't.

Since the simpleton Vennari had to the say that the "h0Ɩ0cαųst" interview was infamous (and so a mistake), I've to clarify:

Bishop Williamson just told the truth. See recent Cathinfo topics for more technical details on it.

Furthermore:

1. Telling the truth is never a "mistake". Of course in our satanic modern world it is.

2. Still too many people don't know what the vicious Jєωιѕн "h0Ɩ0cαųst" lie did and still does to us Germans and to the Palestinians: it kills us. Next to the global effect that the "h0Ɩ0cαųst" lie is the base of the Jєωιѕн nєω ωσrℓ∂ σr∂єr. See Bishop Williamson's quote (middle part of my article there). Let's remember that the Bilderberger etc. who're controlling most European governments today are just manoeuvring areas of the Jєωιѕн Rockefeller and Rothschild clans.

Add 2) The Palestinians are liquidated physically by the Jєωιѕн mass murderers virtually every day. The German people are a) raised with a canine devotion to the vicious Jєωs (so not daring to oppose even the most vicious madness coming from USrael like one unjust war and war crimes after the other). And b) the false "h0Ɩ0cαųst guilt" trained in the Germans a hatred against themselves in a way that many don't want to exist anymore. Both a) and b) in the end liquidates us mentally, and this instrument of power is maintained by the "h0Ɩ0cαųst" brain-washing lie from Kindergarten to retirement homes, even more so now when the vile media and the German Neo-SSPX starts their untrue reports about the expulsion of Bishop Williamson.

The older the WW2 period gets, the more intensive the Jєωs turn up their "h0Ɩ0cαųst" propaganda. There's hardly any new Hollywood movie today which wouldn't take the same line. Which shows that they see their hopes dashed.

So, in the end, Bishop Williamson just once more stroke a blow for the truth.

It has been said that Bishop Fellay and company set that first interview up to trap Bishop Williamson since they know of his strong opinion on the matter. This is backed up by the fact that Bishop Fellay sent the same news crew to England months later to interview Bishop Williamson again. Bishop Williamson, of course, declined the interview.

Bishop Fellay has been up to evil after evil. It is truly regretable. He needs many prayers for God's wrath is no doubt aimed right at him.

sspxbvm · « **Reply #50 on:** October 27, 2012, 05:58:37 PM »

Quote from: J.Paul

Quote
It is not my intention to step in between warring factions, as in cases like this there are often faults on both sides and it is not my mission to root out all the details. Further, I have been in the traditionalist movement for 32 years and have seen how ugly these fights can become

There is where Mr. Vennari should have stopped. His neutrality was surrendered when he proceeded to name Bishop Willamson and neglected to add any instance of Bishop Fellay's culpability.

If he is here, giving an example of what he sees as fault on both sides, where is that other side. It definitely leaves the reader with the impression, by default, that Bishop Williamson was the prime offender.

This press release is a statement which did not need to be made.

He probably thinks he will get more subscriptions from the Fellay crowd since the few who are proving true to Christ mostly can't afford the paper. There are not enough subscriptions with the right crowd. It's all about money in the long run.

Incredulous · « **Reply #51 on:** October 29, 2012, 07:34:59 PM »

Quote from: AntiFellayism

CFN should stand for:

Catholic Faux News