Back to the topic. Well, I am a pragmatis rather than idealist.
I reccomend this community to produce a video for the larger audiences of ignorant (as me) Catholics.
As you gain popularity and followers, your authoritativeness and stature will grow hand in hand with concern and attention from Rome.
1. Short. 5 minutes max, attention span of majority is short.
2. Select few, important questions. Perhaps three or four maximum.
3. Unbiased. Rome's errror is clear and traditionalists perspective need not be embellished to express all its truth. Unbiased presentation will help distribution and forwarding to both sides. Rather than asserting your position, ask questions and allow audiences to answer by themselves. If one has a strong case, then this is a very powerful tool to win consent as the audience will feel that they have come up with the truth or right answer and it will become conviction.
4. Use very simple language. The concept too must be presented in a very easy way to understand. The majority of Catholics do not even know what a Council is!
5. Vibrant presentation with up-tempo, beat and flair. Boring videos will not be forwarded.
6. Hire professionals to produce the video. If the quality is on a par with the examples below, the ideas gain "credibility". The money you invest in this, may reward you many folds.
7. Address the symptoms rather than the causes (*).
Some video production houses are very good and I reccommend hiring the best.
These are a few examples of well produced videos. Disregard the content and look at the packaging/presentation on youtube:
> PragerU: Very clear and easy to understand.
> Vox: (too long) but excellent production quality, dynamism and flair.
> Ted-Ed: excellent digital animation and consequentiality
(*) I would strongly consider a video where Vatican II is not even mentioned. A video that addresses the symptoms and all that is bad with Rome and how a Traditinalist resistance has grown. While the casuses (Vatican II) are complex, difficult and require in depth understanding of liturgy, canon, doctrine, etc., to understand, the symptoms are easy to understand and every one is affected personally. The symptoms cause discontent and disgust and are asy to appreciate (or deprecate) by every day Catholics: crucifixes removed from schools, store clerks being told not to say "Merry Christms", the Pontiff's recent apology of infanticide in South American communities (It's part of their culture), ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs being allowed to adopt children... etc., etc..
The video voice over should introduce and describe the issue and then, simply, ask what is right? Who is to blame?
The answer is obvious and inescapable and the viewer will think that he has come to an independent conslusion that will reinforce it as an opinion of personal conviction. A question will be more powerful than the video voce over attributing responsibilities.
One should fight a bad ideology, not technology. Embrace technology to save traditions.
Tommaso