I note you are always emphasizing the possibility the evidence could be tampered with, bunk, diabolic, etc.

What you never allow is that it is possibly authentic (i.e., even the possibility is a priori unacceptable/impossible).

That's YOUR error, not Williamson's.

2) It does not follow that because there is (possibly) a miracle, the rite is to be lauded. 

For example, I give an exactly opposite reason why God would (possibly) perform a Eucharistic miracle at the No us Ordo:

To instill belief in the real presence, which the Novus Ordo attacks.

I disagree. There is no precedent for God using a false rite to perform miracles and why would He confirm the truth of the real presence by using that abomination?

This fighting between two traditional men with Holy Orders is probably the saddest thing I've seen on this forum. Can't one of them take the high road? Is the counsel of Our Lord in the Sermon on the Mount just theoretical and not practical? "Blessed are the peacemakers..." We are supposed to be the Cream of the Crop among Catholics. No one ever said that the virtue of Charity is easy. What's happened to us? "...if you have anything against your neighbor, make amends before you bring your gift to the altar"....."Lord, how many times must I forgive my neighbor, seven times? "No, Peter, seventy times seven." I've lost tons of respect for both of them. And I do hope that +Zendejas doesn't figure in to Fr. Hewko's having to beg for Oils from His Grace. Why would FrH have to appeal to +Williamson way across the sea when he could receive them locally? Unless....

Right?  Could you imagine if this was Father Cekada or Bishop Sanborn? 

On a serious note, however....is it possible that there is something seriously wrong with Bishop Williamson (cognitively speaking)? These comments seem totally imbalanced.

This thread has little to do with Eucharistic miracles and everything to do with a defiant priest very publicly and energetically attacking the sole faithful bishop of the SSPX, to the point of "Fake Resistance", and then expecting his support.

Why the attack on Bishop Williamson by this priest, Fr David Hewko? For holding opinions that are not forbidden by the Catholic Faith.

This is not at all about Eucharisitc miracles - Bishop Williamson is as good as saying to Fr Hewko that he will come to his succour the moment he publicly apologises for his outrageous attacks and publicly reconciles with the bishop he should never have separated from. As the Bishop says, he needs to choose.

Publishing this correspondence of his with the good Bishop is the latest of the miserable attempts of Fr Hewko at self-justification. Nothing could give BW clearer proof of his unrepentance.

The idea that BW ought to accede to the requests of this priest without his publicly reconciling with him are utterly outrageous and neither for the glory of God nor the salvation of souls. Fr Hewko has led faithful all around the world down a dead end of no priests, no sacraments, no Church... there are faithful of his that are already effectively at this point, so isolated are they from this "one faithful priest" (!) that they will never receive another sacrament before they die.

Only one thing must happen: this delinquent priest must fall on his knees and ask Bishop Williamson forgiveness and get back to work with the other good priests advancing the Kingdom of God on Earth.

Let us pray that he does that.

Right?  Could you imagine if this was Father Cekada or Bishop Sanborn? 

On a serious note, however....is it possible that there is something seriously wrong with Bishop Williamson (cognitively speaking)? These comments seem totally imbalanced.

1) You are arguing over semantics since God is supposedly using that “rite” as a vehicle to display his miraculous powers.

2) I disagree. There is no precedent for God using a false rite to perform miracles and why would He confirm the truth of the real presence by using that abomination?